Responses to trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-Dxd) in HER2 IHC spectrum 2+ versus 3+ urothelial carcinoma across lines of therapy.

S Sara El Sarout (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) M Mahmut Akgul (Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) R Rashad Nawfal (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) W Wassim Daoud Khatoun (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) R Razane El Hajj Chehade (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) T Tarek Baroud (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) G Gunsagar Singh Gulati (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) G Gabriella Rickards (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) B Brady James (Boston College) G Gaelle Nafeh (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) E Elio Ibrahim (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) C Charlene Mantia (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) T Toni K. Choueiri (Department of Medical Oncology Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA) M Michelle S. Hirsch J Joaquim Bellmunt (Department of Medical Oncology Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA)

Abstract

4581 Background: The role of HER2 as a therapeutically actionable target has been validated with the DESTINY-PanTumor02 trial demonstrating meaningful clinical benefit to T-DXd across HER2-expressing bladder malignancies leading to the FDA approval in the immunohistochemical (IHC) 3+ population. We explore the clinical outcome of real-world patients with urothelial carcinoma (UCa) on T-DXd and its correlation with molecular and pathological findings across all the HER-2 IHC scores (e.g., 0 to 3+). Methods: We reviewed the clinical, pathologic, and molecular data of 29 patients with UCa, who received T-DXd between April 2024 and November 2025. Baseline clinical variables included age, sex, ECOG performance status, visceral metastases, line of therapy, and HER2 IHC score (adapted from gastric cancer scoring). Available genomic data included tumor mutational burden (TMB ≥10 mut/Mb), ERBB2 amplification and mutation, DNA damage response (DDR), FGFR alterations, and microsatellite instability (MSI) status. Outcomes of interest included Objective Response Rate (ORR), Disease Control Rate (DCR), and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) which were estimated using Kaplan–Meier methods and compared across groups using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios. Results: Higher HER2 IHC scores were associated with greater clinical activity and higher ORR in IHC 2+ (n=7; 42.9; 95% CI = 9.9–81.6%) tumors and HER2 IHC 3+ (n=20; 55.0; 95% CI =31.5–76.9%). However, no response was seen in HER2 IHC 1+ (n=2). Median duration of response was 15.6 months in HER2 IHC 2+ and 11.6 months in HER2 IHC 3+ (15/30 patients received T-DXd in ≥3 lines). PFS and OS appeared comparable between HER2 2+ and HER2 3+ tumors, with no statistically significant difference by log-rank test (p = 0.67, p = 0.79 respectively). Elevated TMB was observed in 6/12 cases. ERBB2 amplification was detected in 3/10 of cases and ERBB2 mutation in 5/13 of cases. Alterations in DDR related genes and FGFR were identified in patients 2/11 and 1/12 respectively, while MSI-H was not observed in any case. Responses were numerically higher when T-DXd was given in 2 nd line (53.3%, 95% CI 26.6–78.7%) than in further lines (42.9%, 95% CI 17.7–71.1%) and so was DCR 93% (95% CI 68.1–99.8%) in 2 nd line than 71.4% (95% CI 41-91.6%) in further (≥3) lines. Conclusions: T-DXd demonstrated meaningful clinical activity not only in IHC 3+ but in IHC 2+ tumors as well, which is consistent with the results of the DESTINY-PanTumor02 trial. In this limited sample size, there was no statistically significant association between genomic features and patient outcomes. Larger studies are needed to further find predictors across different levels of IHC expression. HER2 IHC Score n Responders (CR/PR) ORR (%) 95% CI 1+ 2 0 0.0 0.0–84.2% 2+ 7 3 42.9 9.9–81.6% 3+ 20 11 55.0 31.5–76.9%

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 4581-4581
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (15)

S

Sara El Sarout

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

M

Mahmut Akgul

Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

R

Rashad Nawfal

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

W

Wassim Daoud Khatoun

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

R

Razane El Hajj Chehade

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

T

Tarek Baroud

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

G

Gunsagar Singh Gulati

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

G

Gabriella Rickards

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

B

Brady James

Boston College

G

Gaelle Nafeh

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

E

Elio Ibrahim

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

C

Charlene Mantia

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

T

Toni K. Choueiri

Department of Medical Oncology Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA

M

Michelle S. Hirsch

J

Joaquim Bellmunt

Department of Medical Oncology Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA