Response analysis for injected and non-injected lesions and of the safety and efficacy of superficial and deep/visceral RP1 injection in the registrational cohort of anti–PD-1–failed melanoma patients of the IGNYTE trial.
Abstract
9537 Background: The IGNYTE trial (NCT03767348) primary analysis of RP1 (vusolimogene oderparepvec) plusnivolumab (nivo) showed clinically meaningful durable efficacy (ORR, 32.9%; median DOR, 33.7 mos, by RECIST 1.1 and independent central review) in patients (pts) with advanced melanoma, including deep responses in non-injected visceral lesions, demonstrating systemic efficacy. Here we present an analysis of efficacy in injected and non-injected lesions and safety and efficacy in pts receiving superficial and/or deep/visceral RP1 injections. Methods: Pts with confirmed progression during anti–PD-1 ± anti–CTLA-4 for ≥8 weeks were enrolled. RP1 (1×10 6 PFU/mL x1, then Q2W 1×10 7 PFU/mL x7, up to 10 mL) was injected into superficial and/or deep/visceral tumors using imaging guidance. Nivo was given (240 mg Q2W) from the 2 nd dose of RP1 through dose 8, then alone (240 mg Q2W or 480 mg Q4W) for 2 yrs, with additional RP1 injections allowed if indicated. Results: For the 46 responding patients by RECIST 1.1 (of the 140 enrolled) 197 lesions were measured, 78 injected, 119 non-injected of which 98.7% and 96.6% had any reduction and 93.5% and 79.0% >30% reduction, respectively. For visceral lesions, 85.7% of injected and 96.2% of non-injected lesions had any reduction and 85.7% and 65.4% had >30% reduction, respectively. 104 patients had superficial only injections, and 36 had deep/visceral +/- superficial injections. Treatment-related adverse event (TRAEs) rates were comparable in patients who were injected superficially compared to patients who received deep/visceral injections, except for chills, influenza-like illness, and injection-site pain, which were numerically higher in the deep/visceral +/- superficial group. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 14.4% of pts by superficial injection and 8.3% by deep/visceral +/- superficial injection. Grade 1/2 pneumothorax occurred in 3/52 (5.8%) lung injections. No liver function abnormalities or significant bleeds were reported after liver injections. The ORR for pts with superficial injection only was 29.8%, and 41.7% for deep/visceral +/- superficial. Conclusions: Meaningful systemic responses were observed independent of the injection status of individual lesions or their anatomical site. Overall response was therefore driven by the response of both injected and non-injected lesions. The safety profile of deep/visceral injection was comparable to that of superficial injections, with efficacy also being similar. Clinical trial information: NCT03767348 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (19)
Gino Kim In
Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Michael K.K. Wong
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
Joseph J. Sacco
Eva Muñoz Couselo
Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO) and Vall d’Hebron Hospital Medical Oncology Department, Barcelona, Spain
Dirk Schadendorf
Georgia Beasley
Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC
Jiaxin Niu
Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ
Bartosz Chmielowski
Trisha Michel Wise-Draper
University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH
Mohammed M. Milhem
Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
Tawnya Lynn Bowles
Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, UT
Katy K. Tsai
Céleste Lebbé
Caroline Gaudy-Marqueste
From the Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center (J.D.W.) and the Department of Medicine (J.D.W., M.A.P.), Weill Cornell Medicine, and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (M.A.P.) — both in New York; Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padua (V.C.-S.), European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan (P.Q.), Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, IRCCS, Meldola (M.G.), University of Siena and the Center for Immuno-Oncology, University Hospital of Siena, Siena (M.M.), and Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples (P.A.A.) — all in Italy; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland (P.R.); Texas Oncology–Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas (C.L.C.); University Hospital Essen, the German Cancer Consortium, the National Center for Tumor Diseases–West, the Research Alliance Ruhr, Research Center One Health, and University Duisburg-Essen — all in Essen, Germany (D.S.); the College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea (J.W.), Brist...
Adel Samson
Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James’s, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
Junhong Zhu
Replimune, Inc, Woburn, MA
Marcus Viana
Replimune, Inc., Woburn, MA
Jeannie Whit-Shan Hou
Replimune, Inc., Woburn, MA
Caroline Robert