Research on multi-objective emergency resource scheduling optimization in chemical industrial parks

Abstract

The high concentration of hazardous sources in chemical parks, which is prone to cause chain accidents, puts forward the demand for dynamic cooperative optimization of emergency resource scheduling. Aiming at the deficiencies of existing studies in the adaptability of dynamic multi-hazard scenarios and the quantification of resource allocation fairness, this paper constructs a three-objective mixed-integer planning model that integrates time efficiency, demand coverage and allocation fairness. Fairness is innovatively quantified as an independent optimization objective, and a standard deviation-based dynamic resource allocation balance index is proposed, which combines multi-warehouse collaborative supply and multi-resource coupling constraint mechanism to systematically solve the problem of trade-offs between timeliness, adequacy and fairness in emergency dispatching in chemical accidents. The improved NSGA-II algorithm is used to solve the Pareto front efficiently, and the search efficiency is improved by the elite reservation strategy and the congestion adaptive adjustment mechanism. In the case study, comparative experiments with the weighted method and the MOGWO algorithm demonstrate that NSGA-II performs superiorly in key metrics, exhibiting excellent convergence, diversity, and stability. Based on this, a case study is conducted using a chemical industrial park in China as an example, generating 41 sets of weights covering extreme preferences, two-objective balance, and three-objective balance. Decision-makers screen solutions based on loss tolerance thresholds and select the optimal solution using a composite score of comprehensive weighted losses. The study further reveals that improvements in demand satisfaction rates are often accompanied by significant increases in transportation time, while pursuing optimal fairness may weaken overall demand satisfaction levels. Sensitivity analysis confirms that resource demand is the key driver determining the number of feasible solutions, while fairness, as an independent optimization objective, holds irreplaceable importance in emergency scheduling decisions.