Relationship between androgen deprivation therapy and kidney function in patients with prostate cancer: An analysis of the RADICAL-PC study.

G Geethan Baskaran (Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada) J Jehonathan H. Pinthus C Celestia S. Higano (University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA) C Cristina Cano Garcia R Rajibul Mian (Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada) G Germano Dallegrave Cavalli (Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada) G Guila Delouya (Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada) C Cesar O.L. Dusilek (Hospital do Rocio, Campo Largo, Brazil) B Bobby Shayegan R Rafaela Kirchner Piccoli (Hospital de Clínicas Ijuí, Ijuí, Brazil) T Tamim Niazi (Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada) M Margot K. Davis (University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada) A Avirup Guha J Joseph B. Selvanayagam J Jose Enrique Cita Pardo (Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia) P Patrick P. Luke (London Health Science Centre, London, ON, Canada) D Darryl Leong (Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences and McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada)

Abstract

115 Background: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is an effective treatment for patients with advanced prostate cancer (PC). However, its impact on renal function remains underexplored. We evaluated the impact of ADT on kidney function in a cohort of patients with PC. Methods: We analyzed the RADICAL-PC study (Role of Androgen-Deprivation Therapy in Cardiovascular Disease—A Longitudinal Prostate Cancer study, NCT04127631), a prospective study of patients with PC in 10 countries. ADT use was assessed at baseline and follow-up visits. We quantified kidney function using glomerular filtration rate (GFR), calculated using the CKD-EPI equation and creatinine measurements obtained at annual visits. We used a linear mixed-effects regression model to analyze the association between ADT and change in GFR (ΔGFR), adjusting for age, diabetes, hypertension, renal disease, heart failure, chemotherapy, medications, alcohol use, and smoking. Using a Cox regression model, we assessed the association between ADT and acute kidney injury (AKI) as reported by sites. Results: Our analysis included 4119 participants with a median age of 68 (IQR 63-74) years. In 1791 (43%) participants using ADT at baseline, the ΔGFR over 2 years was -0.64 [95%CI -1.05 to -0.22] ml/min/1.73m 2 /year. In 2328 (57%) ADT-naïve participants at baseline, the ΔGFR was -1.00 [95%CI -1.34 to -0.64] ml/min/1.73m 2 /year. There was no significant difference in ΔGFR between the two groups (p=0.20). Age (β=-0.58, p<0.001), hypertension (β=-1.98, p<0.01), and anticoagulation use (β=-3.92, p<0.001) were associated with GFR decline. When analyzed as a time-varying covariate, ADT use was associated with less GFR decline than no ADT use (-0.21 vs. -1.07 ml/min/1.73m 2 /year, respectively, p<0.01). Duration of ADT use was not associated with ΔGFR (+0.04 [95%CI -0.02 to 0.10] ml/min/1.73m 2 /month, p=0.18). AKI developed in 91 (2.2%) participants over a median follow-up of 25 (IQR 12-36) months. Baseline ADT use was associated with an increased risk of AKI in univariate analysis (HR 2.58 [95%CI 1.67 to 3.98], p<0.001), but was not significant after adjustment for covariates (HR 1.37 [95%CI 0.83 to 2.26], p=0.22). Conclusions: This analysis suggests that ADT use is not associated with GFR decline or AKI incidence in patients with PC, challenging previous literature concerning ADT-related renal dysfunction. Further studies with longer follow-up periods are needed to confirm these findings.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 5_suppl
Published February 10, 2025
Pages 115-115
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (17)

G

Geethan Baskaran

Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

J

Jehonathan H. Pinthus

C

Celestia S. Higano

University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA

C

Cristina Cano Garcia

R

Rajibul Mian

Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

G

Germano Dallegrave Cavalli

Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

G

Guila Delouya

Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada

C

Cesar O.L. Dusilek

Hospital do Rocio, Campo Largo, Brazil

B

Bobby Shayegan

R

Rafaela Kirchner Piccoli

Hospital de Clínicas Ijuí, Ijuí, Brazil

T

Tamim Niazi

Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

M

Margot K. Davis

University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

A

Avirup Guha

J

Joseph B. Selvanayagam

J

Jose Enrique Cita Pardo

Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia

P

Patrick P. Luke

London Health Science Centre, London, ON, Canada

D

Darryl Leong

Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences and McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada