Reasons for treatment discontinuation in multiple myeloma: Insights from the PREAMBLE registry

R Ravi Vij (11Division of Oncology, Washington University, St Louis, MO) M Mark Fiala (4Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Oncology, St. Louis, United States) D David Cella B Brian Durie (3Cedars-Sinai Samuel Oschin Cancer Center, Los Angeles, United States) D David Kuter (1Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Hematology Division, Boston, United States) C Claudio Cerchione K Kamaraj Karunanithi (6University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom) J Jing Bo Li (2Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, United States) A Amanda Crosbie (7Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, United States) G Gabriela Hernandez-Rivera (4Celgene International Sàrl, a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Boudry, Switzerland) A Antoine Tinel (3Celgene International Sarl, a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Boudry, Switzerland) T Thomas S. Marshall (7Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, United States) M Meghan Podolsky (2Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, United States) K Karthik Ramasamy

Abstract

Abstract Introduction : Despite treatment (tx) advances in multiple myeloma (MM), patients (pts) continue to face shortened survival compared with the general population, highlighting the persistent unmet need. Available therapies remain insufficient due to heterogenous population, prior exposure, disease biology, and increasing attrition with each line of therapy (LOT). In real-world practice, tx-limiting toxicities often result in discontinuation, even when disease progression is not evident. However, most data on tx discontinuation stem from clinical trials, with limited insights from the broader MM population. This study aims to assess reasons for and rates of tx discontinuation across LOT cohorts to better understand and address unmet needs of pts with MM. Methods : This prospective, observational cohort study used data collected via the PREAMBLE registry (NCT01838512) to assess demographic and clinical characteristics, tx patterns, and rates and reasons for tx discontinuation in pts with MM. Pts were evaluated within overlapping LOT cohorts (first-line [1L]–fifth-line [5L]) from Jan 1, 2015, and followed until end of available data (Sep 5, 2024). Index was the start of therapy for each cohort. Index date was defined as initiation of therapy for each respective LOT cohort. Pts were included in a LOT cohort if the therapy continued beyond their enrolment in the study (LOTs captured prior to enrolment in retrospective chart review were not included). Those lacking date information for LOTs were excluded from the analysis. Outcomes were analysed using descriptive statistics. Results : Of 1718 PREAMBLE pts included, 656 had prospective data for 1L; 905 2L; 663 3L; 451 4L; 240 5L. Median age across cohorts was ~70 y (SD, ~10). with a slightly higher proportion of male to female pts. Most pts were White (72–79%). Median follow-up ranged from 10.9 to 40.5 mo (1L, 40.5 mo [SD, 22.7]; 2L, 28.3 mo [SD, 20.9]; 3L, 17.8 mo [SD, 16.5]; 4L, 12.4 mo [SD, 15.6]; 5L, 10.9 mo [SD, 12.0]). Approximately 70% of pts were outside the US across 2L–5L, with an equal proportion from Europe and the US in 1L and enrolled from Jan 1, 2018. Most pts received autologous stem cell transplant during 1L–2L (16% 1L, 18% 2L). High-risk status (per R-ISS stage III and cytogenetic features) was similar across LOTs (18–23%). Prior exposure to all main tx classes increased with LOTs (immunomodulatory drug [IMiD®] agents: 54% 2L, 99% 5L; proteasome inhibitors [PIs] 82% 2L, 98% 5L; anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) 3% 2L, 40% 5L; alkylating agent-based therapies 43% 2L, 79% 5L). At index: IMiD agent + PI exposure was seen in 39% of pts who experienced 2L, 78% 3L, 90% 4L, 98% 5L; IMiD agent + anti-CD38 mAb in 2% 2L, 15% 3L, 26% 4L, 40% 5L; PI + anti-CD38 mAb in 2% 2L, 16% 3L, 28% 4L, 40% 5L. IMiD agent + PI + anti-CD38 mAb exposure was seen in 1% 2L, 14% 3L, 26% 4L, 40% 5L. The top 3 most common index line regimens (± corticosteroids) were: 1L lenalidomide (LEN) + bortezomib (BORT) (RVd, 22%), BORT + cyclophosphamide (CyBorD, 18%), BORT (12%); 2L LEN (18%), daratumumab (DARA) + BORT (DVd, 8%), DARA + LEN (DRd, 7%); 3L LEN (11%), pomalidomide (POM) (8%), DVd (6%); 4L POM 10%, DARA (9%), carfilzomib (CFZ) (6%); 5L DARA (11%), POM (8%), CFZ (6%). The proportion of pts discontinuing tx due to death or disease progression increased with later LOTs (12% of pts died on or after 1L, 23% on or after 5L; 9% discontinued at 1L due to disease progression, 24% at 5L). Across LOT cohorts, 5–9% discontinued due to toxicity. Fewer pts in later LOTs discontinued due to tx completion/maximum clinical benefit (1L: 23%/9%, 5L: 4%/5%). Tx discontinuation reasons remained undocumented in 29–39% of cases due to study completion/study discontinuation/loss to follow up. Conclusions : Understanding reasons for tx discontinuation in pts with MM can offer valuable insights into pt burden and tx choices. The increasing prevalence of discontinuation due to death and progression across successive lines of therapy, along with the inability to complete tx, reflect a continued unmet need in these pts. Reasons for discontinuation observed in this study highlight ongoing challenges related to maintaining tx. These results emphasize the need for more tolerable and effective tx promoting sustained adherence and better long-term outcomes in MM. Ongoing research to understand how tx discontinuation impacts pt outcomes in the real world is warranted to improve outcomes and guide tx strategies.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 6345-6345
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (14)

R

Ravi Vij

11Division of Oncology, Washington University, St Louis, MO

M

Mark Fiala

4Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Oncology, St. Louis, United States

D

David Cella

B

Brian Durie

3Cedars-Sinai Samuel Oschin Cancer Center, Los Angeles, United States

D

David Kuter

1Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Hematology Division, Boston, United States

C

Claudio Cerchione

K

Kamaraj Karunanithi

6University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom

J

Jing Bo Li

2Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, United States

A

Amanda Crosbie

7Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, United States

G

Gabriela Hernandez-Rivera

4Celgene International Sàrl, a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Boudry, Switzerland

A

Antoine Tinel

3Celgene International Sarl, a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Boudry, Switzerland

T

Thomas S. Marshall

7Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, United States

M

Meghan Podolsky

2Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, United States

K

Karthik Ramasamy