Real-world use of fruquintinib in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer in the United States.

V Vasu Bansal (1University of Missouri Kansas City, kansan city, United States) A Aakriti Adhikari (2University of Missouri, Kansas City, Kansas, United States) S Souvik Saha (University of Missouri Kansas City, Kansas City, MO) V Varshini Srinivasan (University of Missouri Kansas City, Kansas City, MO) P Priyanshi Maurya (University of Missouri-Kansas City, MO, Kansas, United States) M Mayank Goyal (Department of Radiology, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, AB, Canada) A Anas Al-sadi (2University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, United States) A Audrey Harris (University of Missouri - Kansas City, Kansas City, MO) H Haley McConville (Truman Medical Center-Hospital Hill, Kansas City, MO) H Himil Mahadevia (4Mayo Clinic Florida, 4500 San Pablo Rd S, United States) A Anmol Singh (U Conn, Hartford, Connecticut, United States) O Osama M. MoSalem (Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City, Kansas City, MO)

Abstract

e15713 Background: Fruquintinib demonstrated overall survival benefit in heavily pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in FRESCO and FRESCO-2. The FDA approved fruquintinib on Nov 8, 2023 for adult patients with mCRC after standard chemotherapy plus anti-VEGF therapy, with anti-EGFR therapy when appropriate (e.g., RAS wild-type). Observed geographic variation in post-approval uptake suggests potential disparities in the delivery of evidence-based medicine across U.S. regions. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Epic Cosmos, a database of over 300 million patient records from over 1,500 hospitals nationwide. We identified adults with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with prior standard systemic therapy exposure and recorded fruquintinib exposure following FDA approval beginning Nov 8, 2023. Fruquintinib uptake was analyzed by U.S. Census region and state, expressed as the proportion of eligible mCRC patients receiving fruquintinib within each geography. Results: Among 116,116 pre-treated mCRC patients, 6,722 (5.79%) had recorded fruquintinib exposure during the post-approval period. Uptake varied nearly five-fold across states (2.27%–11.33%) (Table). High-uptake states were disproportionately concentrated in the central U.S./Midwest, whereas multiple low-uptake states were observed in the West and Northeast, suggesting broader regional variation beyond state-to-state differences. Conclusions: In a large national EHR-derived cohort of pre-treated mCRC patients after U.S. approval, fruquintinib uptake demonstrated substantial geographic variation. These findings raise concern for inequities in delivery of evidence-based later-line therapy and highlight the need to identify modifiable system- and site-level drivers (e.g., access, referral patterns, treatment infrastructure) to promote equitable adoption. Fruquintinib uptake among eligible metastatic colorectal cancer patients by U.S. state. Rank Geography Eligible mCRC (N) Fruquintinib uptake (%) Overall Overall 116,116 5.79 Top 1 Oklahoma 1,236 11.33 2 Kansas 1,312 10.75 3 Indiana 2,448 10.70 4 Missouri 1,521 9.47 5 Connecticut 2,208 9.24 Bottom 1 Washington 1,232 2.27 2 Nevada 441 2.72 3 Rhode Island 476 2.73 4 Tennessee 1490 2.82 5 Maine 614 2.93 Fruquintinib uptake is reported as the proportion of eligible pre-treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with recorded fruquintinib exposure following U.S. FDA approval. States are ranked by uptake percentage.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (12)

V

Vasu Bansal

1University of Missouri Kansas City, kansan city, United States

A

Aakriti Adhikari

2University of Missouri, Kansas City, Kansas, United States

S

Souvik Saha

University of Missouri Kansas City, Kansas City, MO

V

Varshini Srinivasan

University of Missouri Kansas City, Kansas City, MO

P

Priyanshi Maurya

University of Missouri-Kansas City, MO, Kansas, United States

M

Mayank Goyal

Department of Radiology, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, AB, Canada

A

Anas Al-sadi

2University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, United States

A

Audrey Harris

University of Missouri - Kansas City, Kansas City, MO

H

Haley McConville

Truman Medical Center-Hospital Hill, Kansas City, MO

H

Himil Mahadevia

4Mayo Clinic Florida, 4500 San Pablo Rd S, United States

A

Anmol Singh

U Conn, Hartford, Connecticut, United States

O

Osama M. MoSalem

Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City, Kansas City, MO