Real world toxicity profile of enfortumab vedotin (EV) with or without pembrolizumab (P) in ultra elderly urothelial carcinoma (UC) patients (pts).
Abstract
734 Background: EV is an antibody drug conjugate that was approved in the United States as monotherapy for pretreated advanced UC and, then, in combination with P in untreated pts. However, EV is associated with multiple toxicities, which are mostly non-overlapping with those of P. In the EV-302 study, grade (G) 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 55.9% of pts and led to treatment discontinuation in 35.0% of those on EV+P. Pts aged 80 years or older (i.e. the ultra elderly) are a special population, who may be particularly vulnerable to EV toxicity. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of UC pts, who received EV monotherapy or EV+P at 2 academic institutions in Southern California from 12/2019 to 9/2024. Pts had to be aged 80 years or older at EV start to qualify and must have received at least 1 EV dose. Toxicity was graded using the CTCAE version 5 criteria. Results: A total of 26 pts were included, with 83.6% being male. Median age was 86.5 years [range, 80 to 97], with 38.5% of pts aged 80-84 years (group 1), 46.2% aged 85-89 years (group 2), and 15.4% aged over 90 years (group 3). 53.8% identified as Caucasian, 23.1% as Asian, 15.4% as Hispanic, and 7.7% as “other”. 69.2% received EV monotherapy and 30.8% EV+P. In those on EV alone, 88.9% had a prior PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor. At time of data cut off, 27.0% of pts were still receiving EV. Median number of EV infusions given was 10.5 [range, 2 to 25], while median number of weeks on EV was 19.5 [range, 1 to 52]. In group 1, starting EV dose was 1.25 mg/kg in 30.0% of pts and 1.0 mg/kg in 70.0%. In group 2, starting EV dose was 1.25 mg/kg in 16.7% of pts, 1.0 mg/kg in 25.0%, 0.75 mg/kg in 41.7%, and 0.5 mg/kg in 16.7%. In group 3, starting EV dose was 1.25 mg/kg in 25.0% of pts, 1.0 mg/kg in 50.0%, and 0.5 mg/kg in 25.0%. After EV start, 50.0% had at least 1 EV dose reduction, 42.3% had at least 1 dose delay, and 30.8% had EV discontinued due to TRAEs. Toxicity severity in the overall study population was as follows: G0 in 26.9%, G1 in 30.8%, G2 in 26.9%, and G3 in 15.4%. No G4/5 toxicities were noted. Starting EV dose and associated toxicity are outlined in the table. Specific TRAEs included neuropathy in 34.6% of pts, ocular symptoms in 19.2%, rash/pruritus/fatigue/abnormal electrolytes in 15.4% each, nausea and diarrhea in 3.8% each. Conclusions: Despite its small sample size and retrospective nature, this dataset did not identify any excessive or unexpected toxicity in the ultra elderly population. More pts in groups 2/3 received up-front EV dose reduction, with less G2/3 TRAEs noted at lower starting EV doses. Up-front dose reduction of EV may be a good strategy to mitigate TRAE risk. Starting EV dose and associated EV-related TRAEs. Dose (mg/kg) % of pts % of pts with G0 TRAEs % of pts with G1 TRAEs % of pts with G2 TRAEs % of pts with G3 TRAEs 1.25 23.1 16.7 0 66.7 16.7 1.0 46.2 25.0 33.3 25.0 16.7 0.75 19.2 40.0 40.0 0 20.0 0.5 11.5 33.3 66.7 0 0
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (7)
Nataliya Mar
University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA
Jeanah Go
University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
Marsenne Y. Cabral
Division of Hematology/Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
Dalia Kaakour
Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
Sami Dwabe
Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
Steven Neema Seyedin
University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Alexandra Drakaki