Real-world outcomes with elranatamab in multiple myeloma: A multi-center analysis from the United States multiple myeloma immunotherapy consortium
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: Elranatamab, a BCMA-CD3 bispecific antibody, has shown efficacy in relapsed multiple myeloma (MM), but real-world data on its safety and effectiveness are limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multi-center study of patients (pts) treated with commercial elranatamab from 8/2023–3/2025 at 9 U.S. academic centers. Logistic and Cox regression were used for binary and time-to-event outcomes, respectively. Multivariable analysis (MVA) adjusted for prior lines of therapy (LOTs), baseline Hgb (per g/dL), and LDH (per 100 U/L) as continuous variables; and for BCMA exposure, extramedullary disease (EMD; extraosseous soft tissue lesions), and ECOG ≥2 as binary variables. Results: Of 130 pts, median age was 71 yrs (range 39–95); 57% were female, 82% white, 13% black, and 35% had ECOG ≥2 (11% ≥3). Median LOTs was 6; 91% were triple-class refractory, 49% penta-refractory, 49% BCMA-exposed (median 15.5 mo [IQR 11.8–20.5] since last exposure), and 49% had prior anti-BCMA CAR-T. Most recent BCMA exposures included: CAR-T (84%), TCE (9.4%), and ADC (6.3%). Only 22% met MagnetisMM-3 cohort A eligibility (which excluded BCMA-exposed pts). High-risk cytogenetics (del(17p), t(4;14), t(14;16), or amp(1q)) were present in 44% (25%, 13%, 6.3%, and 7.9%, respectively). EMD was seen in 22%. Median treatment duration was 4.0 mo (95% CI 2.93–6.3) overall and 7.9 mo (95% CI 5.83–NA) with ≥VGPR. Discontinuation due to toxicity or non-relapse mortality occurred in 12% but was significantly lower among those receiving IVIg (5% vs. 17%, p=0.031); IVIg was given in 47%. The overall response rate (ORR) was 65%, including ≥VGPR in 46% and ≥CR in 36%, consistent with MagnetisMM-3 (ORR 61%, ≥CR 35%; Lesokhin et al. Nat Med. 2023). After median follow-up of 7.5 mo, median PFS was 4.3 mo (95% CI 3.4–11.3), OS was 14.6 mo (95% CI 8.6–NA), and DOR was 12.2 mo (95% CI 6.1–NA). In contrast, MagnetisMM-3 (Prince et al., ASH 2024) reported median PFS and OS of 17.2 and 24.6 mo, respectively, with DOR not reached despite 28.4 mo of follow-up. In univariate analysis, ECOG ≥2 was associated with lower ORR (45% vs. 71%; OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.16–0.73, p=0.006), shorter OS (4.3 mo vs. NA; HR 2.41, 95% CI 1.33–4.35, p=0.004), and shorter PFS (1.7 vs. 6.5 mo; HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.09–2.87, p=0.020). Prior BCMA-directed therapy was linked to reduced odds of ≥VGPR (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.19–0.77, p=0.008) and ≥CR (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.20–0.89, p=0.025). Higher baseline LDH was linked to shorter OS (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.23–1.53, p<0.001) and PFS (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.18–1.44, p<0.001). Higher baseline Hgb was associated with higher ORR (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.20–1.81, p<0.001) and ≥CR (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.26–1.92, p<0.001). Among BCMA-exposed pts, recent exposure (<1 [n=15] vs. ≥1 yr [n=32]) was associated with shorter OS (4.1 mo vs. NA; HR 3.66, 95% CI 1.26–10.6, p=0.017). In MVA, higher baseline LDH remained independently associated with shorter OS (aHR 1.36, 95% CI 1.19–1.54, p<0.001) and PFS (aHR 1.27, 95% CI 1.13–1.43, p<0.001); higher Hgb with greater odds of ≥CR (aOR 1.44, 95% CI 1.14–1.85, p=0.003) and longer PFS (aHR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72–0.99, p=0.034); and BCMA exposure with lower odds of ≥CR (aOR 0.32, 95% CI 0.10–0.91, p=0.037). CRS occurred in 40% (grade ≥2 in 12.3%, grade 3 in 2.3%), and ICANS in 17% (grade ≥2 in 7.7%). These rates contrast with MagnetisMM-3 (no grade ≥3 CRS, 3.4% ICANS). ICANS risk was lower in BCMA-exposed pts (9.4% vs. 24%; OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.11–0.85, p=0.029), and decreased with more LOTs (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55–0.92, p=0.016) and higher Hgb (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.52–0.94, p=0.023). Tocilizumab and steroids were used in 36% (treatment 28%, prophylaxis 9.2%) and 23%, respectively. Steroid use was less common in BCMA-exposed pts (11% vs. 34%; OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.08–0.60, p=0.004) and declined with more LOTs (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52–0.85, p=0.002). Infections occurred in 40% of the cohort, more common in pts with CrCl <40 mL/min (59% vs. 36%; HR 2.58, 95% CI 1.02–6.80, p=0.049). IVIg was linked to improved infection-free survival (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37–0.93, p=0.023). Conclusions: Elranatamab demonstrated meaningful activity in real-world relapsed MM, though PFS and OS were shorter than in MagnetisMM-3, likely reflecting an older, frailer population with higher disease burden. ICANS was more frequent than in MagnetisMM-3. Baseline anemia and elevated LDH, markers of poor marrow reserve and higher disease burden, were strongly linked to worse outcomes.
Article Details
Authors (39)
Andrew Portuguese
2Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, United States
James Davis
Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
Shahzad Raza
Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
Omar Alexis Castaneda Puglianini
1H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, United States
Ciara Louise Freeman
1H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, United States
Melissa Alsina
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, United States
Corbin Wright
1H. Lee Moffitt Cancer and Research Institute, Tampa, United States
Utkarsh Goel
6Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland, United States
Jack Khouri
1Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland, United States
Faiz Anwer
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Hossam M. Ali
10Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland, United States
Oren Pasvolsky
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
Mahmoud Gaballa
4The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
Krina Patel
4The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
Hector Garcia Pleitez
1Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Lubbock, United States
Damian Mikulski
4The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
Lindsay Fogel
9Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, United States
Eli Zolotov
11Hackensack Meridian Health, Hackensack, United States
Aishwarya Sannareddy
5UT Southwestern Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, United States
Aimaz Afrough
Myeloma, Waldenstrom’s, and Amyloidosis Program, Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center (A.A.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Larry Anderson
5UT Southwestern Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, United States
Kelley Julian
6The University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, United States
Danai Dima
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, United States
Rahul Banerjee
Emily Liang
1Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Clinical Research Division, Seattle, United States
Raffaella Cassano Cassano
2Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, United States
Megan Herr
15Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, United States
Hamza Hassan
7Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
Leyla Shune
Jeries Kort
1The University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, United States
Shonali Midha
13Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
Omar Nadeem
Surbhi Sidana
Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA
Yi Lin
Frederick Locke
1H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Hematology and Oncology, Tampa, United States
Doris Hansen
1H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, United States
Douglas Sborov
9University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt lake City, United States
Noa Biran
11Hackensack Meridian Health, Hackensack, United States
Ariel Grajales-Cruz
1H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, United States