Real-world outcomes of teclistamab for multiple myeloma in Canada: Multi-institutional report from the Canadian myeloma research group (CMRG) database

G Guido Lancman (1Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada) D Donna Reece (Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto) A Arleigh McCurdy (2The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada) E Engin Gul (3Canadian Myeloma Research Group, Vaughan, Canada) S Smriti Sharma J Jiandong Su (3Canadian Myeloma Research Group, Vaughan, Canada) K Kevin Song (Department of Computer Science) M Michael Chu (1University of Alberta, Hematology, Edmonton, Canada) M Martha Louzada (8London Regional Cancer Center, London, Canada) A Alissa Visram (9Juravinski Cancer Center, Hamilton, Canada) D Darrell White (10Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Canada) R Rayan Kaedbey (12Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada) J Jesse Shustik (13BC Cancer Agency, Surrey, Canada) J Julie Stakiw (14Saskatoon Cancer Centre, Saskatoon, Canada) M Michael Sebag (From Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (Y.C.C., I.A.), and the Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University (Y.C.C., H.M., I.A.), Tel Aviv, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan (H.M.), and Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem (M.G.) — all in Israel; McGill University and McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (M.S.), and Alberta Health Services, Edmonton (M.P.C.) — all in Canada; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (K.K.), Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Catholic University of Korea (C.-K.M.), and Seoul National University College of Medicine (S.-S.Y.) — all in Seoul, South Korea; Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Valdecilla, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander (E.M.O.), Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Center for Applied Medical Research, Pamplona (P.R.-O.), Institut Català d’Oncologia, Josep Carreras Leukemia Research Institute, and the Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona (A.O.)...) R Rami Kotb (17Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada) V Victor Jimenez-Zepeda (7University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada) A Anthony Reiman (20Saint John Regional Hospital, Oncology, Saint John, Canada) C Christopher Venner (4BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada) M Muhammad Aslam D Debra Bergstrom (22Newfoundland and Labrador Health Services, St. John's, Canada) A Ashley Freeman (23BC Cancer Agency, Victoria, Canada) E Eve St-Hilaire (24Dr. Georges-L.-Dumont University Hospital Centre, Moncton, Canada) P Philip Kuruvilla (25William Osler Health System, Brampton, Canada) R Richard LeBlanc

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Teclistamab is a highly effective treatment for relapsed multiple myeloma (MM), with an overall response rate (ORR) of 63% and progression-free survival (PFS) of 11.4 months in the MajesTEC-1 trial. real-world data are needed to understand outcomes in a broader patient population. In this study, we examined real-world outcomes of MM pts receiving teclistamab in Canada. Methods: This is a retrospective observational study utilizing the Canadian Myeloma Research Group Database (CMRG-DB), which is a prospectively maintained disease-specific database with > 10,000 patients enrolled from 21 academic centres across Canada. All MM pts who received teclistamab outside of clinical trials from May 2023-March 2025 were included in this study. Primary outcomes were the overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) calculated from the start date of teclistamab. Time-to-event outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Secondary objectives included efficacy outcomes in pts achieving at least a VGPR. Results: We identified 52 pts who received at least one dose of teclistamab , of which 46% were female, median age was 68 (42-90) and 44% had high-risk cytogenetics. Pts had received a median of 4 prior lines (range, 3-10), with 75% of pts having received a prior autologous stem cell transplant, 77% being triple class- refractory, 12% penta-drug refractory, and 8% BCMA-refractory. Median follow up time for all pts was 9.4 months. Among all treated pts, the ORR was 58%, with 50% of all pts achieving at least a VGPR (95% CI, 49%-94%). The median PFS was 10.4 months (95% CI, 3.3-NE)and median OS not reached, with 12-month OS estimate of 67% (95% CI, 54%-83%). Among the pts achieving , median DOR, PFS and OS were not reached. The 9-month was 70% (95% CI, 51%-97%), 12-month PFS 78% (95% CI, 59%-100%) and 12-month OS 95% (95% CI, 86%-100%). Conclusions: In this real-world study, Canadian myeloma pts had similar outcomes to those in the MajesTEC-1 trial. In particular, pts achieving a deep response (at least VGPR) had very favorable PFS and OS at one year, compared to historical outcomes from the LocoMMotion, Mammoth, and CMRG real-world studies. . Given the short follow-up in the current study, efficacy data will be updated at the meeting.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 7596-7596
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (25)

G

Guido Lancman

1Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada

D

Donna Reece

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto

A

Arleigh McCurdy

2The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada

E

Engin Gul

3Canadian Myeloma Research Group, Vaughan, Canada

S

Smriti Sharma

J

Jiandong Su

3Canadian Myeloma Research Group, Vaughan, Canada

K

Kevin Song

Department of Computer Science

M

Michael Chu

1University of Alberta, Hematology, Edmonton, Canada

M

Martha Louzada

8London Regional Cancer Center, London, Canada

A

Alissa Visram

9Juravinski Cancer Center, Hamilton, Canada

D

Darrell White

10Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Canada

R

Rayan Kaedbey

12Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada

J

Jesse Shustik

13BC Cancer Agency, Surrey, Canada

J

Julie Stakiw

14Saskatoon Cancer Centre, Saskatoon, Canada

M

Michael Sebag

From Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (Y.C.C., I.A.), and the Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University (Y.C.C., H.M., I.A.), Tel Aviv, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan (H.M.), and Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem (M.G.) — all in Israel; McGill University and McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (M.S.), and Alberta Health Services, Edmonton (M.P.C.) — all in Canada; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (K.K.), Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Catholic University of Korea (C.-K.M.), and Seoul National University College of Medicine (S.-S.Y.) — all in Seoul, South Korea; Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Valdecilla, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander (E.M.O.), Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Center for Applied Medical Research, Pamplona (P.R.-O.), Institut Català d’Oncologia, Josep Carreras Leukemia Research Institute, and the Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona (A.O.)...

R

Rami Kotb

17Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada

V

Victor Jimenez-Zepeda

7University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada

A

Anthony Reiman

20Saint John Regional Hospital, Oncology, Saint John, Canada

C

Christopher Venner

4BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada

M

Muhammad Aslam

D

Debra Bergstrom

22Newfoundland and Labrador Health Services, St. John's, Canada

A

Ashley Freeman

23BC Cancer Agency, Victoria, Canada

E

Eve St-Hilaire

24Dr. Georges-L.-Dumont University Hospital Centre, Moncton, Canada

P

Philip Kuruvilla

25William Osler Health System, Brampton, Canada

R

Richard LeBlanc