Real-world outcomes of reiki as an integrative supportive care intervention at a comprehensive cancer center in the MENA region.
Abstract
e24081 Background: Integrative medicine interventions, including Reiki, are increasingly incorporated into oncology supportive care; however, real-world outcomes data from the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region remain limited. We evaluated patient-reported outcomes following Reiki sessions delivered as part of routine supportive care at a single comprehensive cancer center. Methods: We analyzed 105 oncology patients who received Reiki sessions. Pain and emotional well-being were assessed using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) before and after each session. Session utilization per patient was summarized descriptively. To account for repeated measures, linear mixed-effects models with patient-level random intercepts were used to evaluate post-session pain scores. Bivariate and multivariable regression analyses examined associations between demographic factors and post-session pain. Results: The median number of Reiki sessions per patient was 3 (IQR 1–7), with a mean of 5.7 ± 7.8 sessions (range 1–53), reflecting episodic and longitudinal use. The cohort was predominantly female (85.7%), with breast cancer as the most common diagnosis, spanning multiple disease stages and treatment phases. Across 594 sessions, post-session pain scores were consistently lower than pre-session assessments. In linear mixed-effects models accounting for repeated sessions within patients, pre-session pain was the strongest predictor of post-session pain (β = 0.28, p < 2×10⁻¹⁶), indicating partial but meaningful pain reduction following individual sessions. Cumulative number of Reiki sessions was not independently associated with post-session pain, suggesting session-specific rather than dose-dependent effects. After adjustment, male sex was associated with higher post-session pain scores compared with females (β = 1.44, p = 0.0028), while age at diagnosis was not significantly associated with pain outcomes. Treatment phase was generally not associated with post-session pain, although patients receiving hormonal therapy reported higher pain scores (β = 3.52, p = 0.039), consistent with chronic symptom burden (removed “in this setting”). Substantial between-patient variability was observed, supporting the use of mixed-effects modeling. In addition to quantitative pain outcomes, patients frequently reported positive emotional and physical responses following Reiki sessions, including peacefulness, comfort, grounding, and mental clarity. Conclusions: In this real-world single-center MENA cohort, Reiki sessions were associated with consistent improvements in patient-reported pain and well-being across a heterogeneous oncology population. These findings support the feasibility of integrating Reiki into routine supportive cancer care and underscore the need for prospective controlled studies to define its effectiveness.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (6)
Jasmin Hundal
1Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States
Aya Abdoh
Beth Israel Lahey Health, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Boston, MA
Mona Tareen
Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Shilpa Kudekar
Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Dima Jarrah
Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Bassel Jallad
Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates