Real-world outcomes of first-line treatments in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: Final analysis of the Registurk-Lung registry.

S Sema Sezgin Goksu M Mehmet Artaç A Ahmet Sezer (Baskent University Adana Application and Research Center, Adana, Turkey) A Abdurrahman Isikdogan (Faculty of Medicine, Dicle University, Diyarbakir, Turkey) M Mehmet Ali Nahit Şendur (Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital and Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara, Turkey) H Haci Mehmet Turk (Bezmialem Vakıf University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey) M Mehmet Bilici (Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey) U Umut Kefeli O Oktay Bozkurt B Bala Basak Oven (Department of Medical Oncology, Yeditepe University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey) E Erdem Cubukcu (Department of Medical Oncology, Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey) E Erdem Goker (Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey) N Nilgun Yildirim (Firat University Department of Medical Oncology, Elazığ, Turkey) G Guzin Demirag (Ondokuz Mayıs University School of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey) M Melike Özçelik E Ezgi Coban (Marmara University, Pendik Research and Training Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey) S Sadettin Kilickap (Istinye University, Ankara Liv Hospital, Ankara, Turkey) D Deniz Tural C Cemil Bilir M Mahmut Gümüş (Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey)

Abstract

e20633 Background: Real-world data are critical to understanding treatment patterns and outcomes in metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) outside clinical trials. The REGISTURK-LUNG registry was designed to evaluate demographic, clinicopathological characteristics, treatment strategies, and survival outcomes of patients with mNSCLC treated in routine clinical practice in Turkiye. Methods: REGISTURK-LUNG is a multicenter, observational registry conducted across 41 centers. This final analysis includes 5,293 patients diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC between January 2022 and March 2024. Demographic features, histopathology, biomarker testing, first-line treatment patterns, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and response rates were analyzed. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using log-rank tests. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated where applicable. Results: The median age was 68 years (range 29–94), and 84.1% of patients were male. Adenocarcinoma (52.8%) and squamous cell carcinoma (32.9%) were the most common histologies. PD-L1 testing was performed in 22.1% of patients. First-line treatment consisted of chemotherapy alone in 88.2%, immunotherapy-containing regimens in 11.8% (single-agent immunotherapy 2.4%; chemo-immunotherapy 9.4%). Median PFS was significantly longer in patients receiving immunotherapy-containing regimens compared with chemotherapy alone (7.5 vs 5.0 months; HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.59–0.91; p = 0.004). Median OS was also improved with immunotherapy-containing treatments (16.0 vs 13.6 months; HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.53–0.88; p < 0.001). Worse PFS and OS were observed in patients with multiple metastatic sites, brain or liver metastases, and poorer ECOG performance status. Higher PD-L1 expression was associated with improved OS (p = 0.001). Conclusions: In this large real-world registry of patients with metastatic NSCLC, first-line immunotherapy-containing regimens were associated with significantly improved PFS and OS compared with chemotherapy alone. These findings support the effectiveness of immunotherapy in routine clinical practice and highlight the prognostic impact of metastatic burden, performance status, and biomarker status in mNSCLC.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

S

Sema Sezgin Goksu

M

Mehmet Artaç

A

Ahmet Sezer

Baskent University Adana Application and Research Center, Adana, Turkey

A

Abdurrahman Isikdogan

Faculty of Medicine, Dicle University, Diyarbakir, Turkey

M

Mehmet Ali Nahit Şendur

Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital and Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara, Turkey

H

Haci Mehmet Turk

Bezmialem Vakıf University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey

M

Mehmet Bilici

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey

U

Umut Kefeli

O

Oktay Bozkurt

B

Bala Basak Oven

Department of Medical Oncology, Yeditepe University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

E

Erdem Cubukcu

Department of Medical Oncology, Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey

E

Erdem Goker

Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey

N

Nilgun Yildirim

Firat University Department of Medical Oncology, Elazığ, Turkey

G

Guzin Demirag

Ondokuz Mayıs University School of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey

M

Melike Özçelik

E

Ezgi Coban

Marmara University, Pendik Research and Training Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey

S

Sadettin Kilickap

Istinye University, Ankara Liv Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

D

Deniz Tural

C

Cemil Bilir

M

Mahmut Gümüş

Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey