Real-world insights: Neoadjuvant KEYNOTE-522 regimen in triple-negative breast cancer patients with germline BRCA mutations.
Abstract
e12618 Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most immunogenic subtype and is highly prevalent among patients (pts) with germline BRCA1/2 mutations (gBRCAm). Regardless of mutation status, the current standard treatment for early-stage TNBC is chemotherapy combined with pembrolizumab, as per the KEYNOTE-522 protocol. Methods: Data were collected from pts diagnosed with early-stage TNBC treated according to the KEYNOTE-522 regimen at ten cancer centers from July 2020 to December 2024. Epidemiological data and treatment outcomes of pts with gBRCAm were compared to those with BRCA wild-type/unknown (BRCAwt). Results: A total of 413 pts were analyzed, of whom 320 (82%) underwent germline testing; 49 (12.7%) had a gBRCAm, including 45 (91%) with BRCA1 and 4 (9%) with BRCA2 mutations. Pts with gBRCAm were younger (median 39 vs. 44 years, P<0.001) and more likely to be premenopausal (80.8% vs. 65.6%, P=0.045) and have grade 3 tumors (91% vs. 80%, P=0.214) than BRCAwt pts. Stage II disease was the most common in both groups (71.4% vs. 70%, P=0.315). Regarding treatment, gBRCAm pts were more frequently treated with dose-dense AC (doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide) (66% vs. 54%, P=0.160) and underwent mastectomy more often (93.9% vs. 35.9%, P=0.001). Only 2% of gBRCAm pts experienced disease progression during neoadjuvant therapy compared to 5% of BRCAwt pts (P=0.491).Pathological complete response (pCR; ypT0-Tis ypN0) rates were 73% in gBRCAm pts compared to 61% in BRCAwt pts (P=0.114). Residual cancer burden (RCB) 0-1 occurred in 83.7% vs. 76.6% (P=0.345). Subgroup analysis by disease stage revealed pCR rates of 74.3% in stage II gBRCAm pts versus 65.2% in BRCAwt pts (P=0.334), and 72.7% in stage III gBRCAm pts compared to 45.3% in BRCAwt pts (P=0.113).Grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) occurred in 50% of gBRCAm pts versus 34.9% of BRCAwt pts (P=0.055), with more frequent neutropenia (32.6% vs. 19.5%, P=0.041), diarrhea (6.1% vs. 1.6%, P=0.079), and immune-related AEs (12.2% vs. 7.4%, P=0.259). There were no significant differences in drug discontinuation rates due to toxicity (28% vs. 22%, P=0.327). Conclusions: Pts with gBRCAm exhibited high pCR rates with the KEYNOTE-522 regimen, achieving pCR rates over 70% even in stage III disease. Further research is needed to optimize treatment strategies in this population, including potential de-escalation approaches.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Monique Celeste Tavares
A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
Romualdo Barroso-Sousa
Brasilia Hospital, Rede Américas, Brasilia, Brazil
Laura Testa
Instituto D’Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), São Paulo, Brazil
Flavia Cavalcanti Balint
A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
Solange Moraes Sanches
A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
Fernanda Madasi Pinheiro
Instituto D’Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
José Bines
Vladmir Cordeiro Lima
A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
Rafael Dal Ponte Ferreira
Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil
Daniela Dornelles Rosa
Zenaide Silva de Souza
Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Brasília, Brazil
Daniele Assad Suzuki
Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Brasília, Brazil
Debora De Melo Gagliato
Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa, São Paulo, Brazil
Carlos Henrique dos Anjos
Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
Bruna M. Zucchetti
DASA Oncology, Hospital 9 De Julho, São Paulo, Brazil
Anezka Carvalho Rubin de Celis Ferrari
Hospital Sirio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
Mayana Lopes De Brito
Clinica AMO, Salvador, Brazil
Maria Marcela F. Monteiro
Cancer Institute of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil
Maria Del Pilar Estevez-Diz
Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Renata Colombo Bonadio
Instituto D’Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), São Paulo, Brazil