Real-world insights into bone marrow carcinomatosis in metastatic breast cancer: A retrospective analysis from two large university breast cancer centers.
Abstract
1104 Background: Bone marrow carcinomatosis (BMC) is a rare but severe manifestation of metastatic breast cancer (mBC) characterized by diffuse bone marrow infiltration and hematologic dysfunction. Data on incidence, clinical presentation, and treatment outcomes remain limited. Methods: This bicentric retrospective real-world study included breast cancer patients diagnosed with BMC between 2010 and 2023 at two German university centers. BMC was diagnosed using bone marrow biopsy and/or leukoerythroblastic blood smear in the presence of cytopenia. Clinical characteristics, systemic treatments, and overall survival (OS) were analyzed descriptively. Survival was estimated using Kaplan–Meier method. Results: During the study period, 1,399 patients presented with mBC at one of two participating centers. Among these, 37 were diagnosed with BMC, corresponding to an incidence of 2.6% (0.5% of all breast cancer cases). Median age was 58 years (range 30 – 76). Most patients had hormone receptor (HR)–positive HER2-negative disease (89%). At BMC diagnosis, anemia occurred in 84%, thrombocytopenia in 76%, and pancytopenia in 57% of patients. Median OS after BMC diagnosis was 12.0 months (95% CI: 6.0, 38.0). Patients with bone-only metastases showed longer survival compared with those with additional visceral involvement (median OS not reached vs. 9 months). In HR-positive HER2-negative disease, patients receiving endocrine-based therapy including CDK4/6 inhibitors demonstrated numerically longer survival compared with chemotherapy-based approaches; however, subgroup sizes were small and analyses exploratory. Conclusions: BMC is an uncommon but clinically relevant manifestation of mBC associated with substantial morbidity and limited prognosis. This largest European real-world cohort highlights heterogeneous treatment approaches and outcomes. Endocrine-based strategies combined with targeted agents appear feasible in selected patients. Multicenter registries and prospective studies are needed to optimize diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in this patient group. Real-world data of the analyzed cohort of patients with BMC. No of patients IHC subtype n (%) Metastatic status at initial BC presentation n (%) Metastatic site at BMC diagnosisn (%) Diagnostic method n (%) Median time to BMC in months (range) Initial treatmentfor BMCn (%) a) HR pos/HER2negb) HER2 posc) TNBC a) M0b) M1 a) visceralb) brainc) bone +/- otherd) bone only a) BM biopsy / smearb) blood smear a) after mBC diagnosisb) after initial BC diagnosis a) combined CTb) mono CTc) ET+CDK4/6id) ET onlye) Anti HER2f) BSC 37 a) 33 (89)b) 4 (11)c) 0 (0) a) 16 (43)b) 21 (57) a) 22 (60)b) 1 (3)c) 37 (100)d) 11 (30) a) 26 (70)b) 11 (30) a) 28 (0-107)b) 58 (0-249) a) 3 (8)b) 20 (54)c) 6 (16)d) 1 (3)e) 1 (3)f) 1 (3)Other: 5 (14)
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Nikolas Tauber
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
Melissa Neubacher
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
Niklas Amann
Jan Philipp Cieslik
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
Irene Esposito
Franziska Fick
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
Catharina Freier
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
Martina Helbig
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
Lisbeth Hilmer
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
Bernadette Jaeger
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
Fabian Kohls
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
Kerstin Muras
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
Anna E. M. Polkaehn
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
Henriette Princk
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
Eugen Ruckhaeberle
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
Maximilian Seidl
Tanja N. Fehm
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
Achim Rody
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
Natalia Krawczyk
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany