Real-world enfortumab vedotin +/- pembrolizumab (EV+/-P)–based treatment toxicity, treatment discontinuation, and associations with survival in advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC).
Abstract
4562 Background: EV-based therapy is central to the standard of care for aUC, increasingly in combination with P. Current understanding of EV-related toxicity is limited to clinical trial data. Here, we use real-world data to characterize the frequency of EV-based treatment-toxicity, -discontinuation, and associations with survival. Methods: We performed a post-marketing retrospective cohort study of EV+/-P initiators at the University of Pennsylvania (1/2020-5/2024). The frequency of any of five toxicities (skin reaction, neuropathy, ocular disorder, hyperglycemia, and pneumonitis) and associated treatment-interruptions (hold or discontinuation), -reduction, or -hospitalization were summarized. Among pts with at ≥1 year of follow-up, overall survival (mOS) was compared between pts with vs without each toxicity via KM methods. Results: Among 123 EV/EV+P treated pts, median age was 68 years, 72% were male, 74% were white, 68% had bladder primary, and 71% treated with EV alone. Frequency of toxicity, time to toxicity, and proportions requiring dose interruption, reduction, and hospitalization are shown (Table). 60% of pts had skin reaction, 47% neuropathy, 28% ocular disorder, 14% hyperglycemia, and 2% pneumonitis; treatment discontinuation occurred among 20% of pts with neuropathy, 5% of those with skin reaction, 3% of those with ocular disorders, and 0% of those with hyperglycemia or pneumonitis. Among 80 pts with at least one-year of follow-up (89% EV monotherapy), mOS was 14.3 months (95% CI: 11.3-19.3). Survival was greater among those with skin reaction, neuropathy, and ocular disorders (mOS skin reaction vs. no reaction: 19.3 vs. 6.4 months, p < 0.001; neuropathy vs. no neuropathy: 16.5 vs. 8.2 months, p = 0.001; ocular disorder vs. no ocular disorder: 17.1 vs. 11.3 months; p = 0.001). Conclusions: EV+/-P treatment toxicity occurred in a majority of pts, but treatment discontinuation was infrequent. Presence of toxicity was significantly associated with improved survival. Future work is needed to prospectively validate these findings. EV+/-P treatment toxicity and survival outcomes (n=123). Toxicity n (% of total) Months to Occurrence, Median (range) Dose Held*,n (%) Dose Reduced*,n (%) Discontinuation*n (%) Hospitalization*n (%) mOS**(n=80) Skin Reaction 74 (60) 0.7 (0.1-13.8) 33 (46) 33 (46) 4 (5) 4 (5) 19. 3 vs 6.4 (p<0.001) Neuropathy 58 (47) 2.9 (0.2-9.6) 28 (48) 23 (40) 11 (20) 0 (0) 16.5 vs. 8.2 (p=0.001) Ocular Disorder 35 (28) 1.8 (0.2-10.6) 4 (11) 3 (9) 1 (3) 0 (0) 17.1 vs 11.3 (p=0.001) Hyperglycemia 17 (14) 1.4 (0.1-5.6) 5 (29) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 9.7 vs. 14.4 (p=0.56) Pneumonitis 3 (2) 3.8 (3.0-11.0) 1 (33) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (33) 22.1 vs. 14.3 (p=0.91) *n (% of pts w/ toxicity). **w/ vs w/o toxicity.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (4)
Martin Kurian
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Vivek Nimgaonkar
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
Omar Elghawy
2Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Ronac Mamtani
Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center