Real-world effectiveness of systemic therapies after [ <sup>177</sup> Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 ( <sup>177</sup> Lu-PSMA-617) treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): A prostate cancer disease observation (PRECISION) data platform analysis.

X Xiao X. Wei (Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) D Daniel J. George (Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC) E Elisabeth I. Heath (Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) N Neal D. Shore (START Carolinas/Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC) J Jennifer Nguyen (Department of Chemistry) J Jeetvan Patel (Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ) A Amrita Sawhney (Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ) B Barinder Kang (Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ) C Clare Byrne (Asclepius Analytics, New York, NY) K Kyle Runeckles (Asclepius Analytics, New York, NY) A Alton Oliver Sartor (LCMC Health, New Orleans, LA)

Abstract

79 Background: In March 2025, the indication for 177 Lu-PSMA-617 was expanded to include prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive patients with mCRPC treated with ≥1 androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) and considered appropriate to delay taxane-based chemotherapy. With 177 Lu-PSMA-617 moving earlier in the treatment journey, it is important to understand the clinical activity of other systemic therapies after 177 Lu-PSMA-617. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes among patients with mCRPC receiving a systemic therapy after 177 Lu-PSMA-617 treatment. Methods: This retrospective, observational study used real-world data from the PRECISION data platform, a proprietary dataset developed by Novartis representative of patients with advanced prostate cancer in the US from diverse clinical settings. Patients with mCRPC treated with 177 Lu-PSMA-617 who received a systemic therapy ≥14 days after treatment with 177 Lu-PSMA-617 between March 23, 2022, and June 27, 2025, were included. Systemic therapies included ARPIs (abiraterone, enzalutamide, darolutamide, apalutamide); chemotherapy (cabazitaxel, docetaxel, carboplatin, cisplatin, etoposide, mitoxantrone); immunotherapy (pembrolizumab, sipuleucel-T); poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (niraparib, olaparib, talazoparib, rucaparib); and radium-223. Patient characteristics and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response were evaluated descriptively. Progression-free survival (PFS) from subsequent therapy initiation was estimated using Kaplan–Meier methodology. Results: A total of 442 patients receiving any subsequent systemic therapy after 177 Lu-PSMA-617 were included. Overall, 95% of patients received ≥1 ARPI and 76% ≥1 taxane pre- 177 Lu-PSMA-617. The median age was 73 years. Most patients received a taxane (n = 188), an ARPI (n = 176), or a PARP inhibitor (n = 33) as their subsequent therapy. The median time to subsequent therapy initiation was 70 days (interquartile range 38−137 days) from the last 177 Lu-PSMA-617 administration. Among 299 patients receiving a systemic therapy after 177 Lu-PSMA-617 with PSA values available both pre-index and during subsequent treatment, 48% achieved a ≥50% reduction in PSA from baseline (PSA50), 31% a PSA80, and 18% a PSA90. The median PFS from the initiation of subsequent therapy was 8.6 months in the entire cohort; this was 10.7 months with a subsequent ARPI, 7.2 months with a subsequent taxane, and 7.1 months with a subsequent PARP inhibitor. Conclusions: In this real-world analysis, meaningful clinical responses were observed in a subset of patients who received subsequent systemic therapies after 177 Lu-PSMA-617.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 7_suppl
Published March 01, 2026
Pages 79-79
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (11)

X

Xiao X. Wei

Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

D

Daniel J. George

Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC

E

Elisabeth I. Heath

Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

N

Neal D. Shore

START Carolinas/Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC

J

Jennifer Nguyen

Department of Chemistry

J

Jeetvan Patel

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ

A

Amrita Sawhney

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ

B

Barinder Kang

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ

C

Clare Byrne

Asclepius Analytics, New York, NY

K

Kyle Runeckles

Asclepius Analytics, New York, NY

A

Alton Oliver Sartor

LCMC Health, New Orleans, LA