Real-world analysis of ctDNA and other biomarkers in patients with curatively resected stage I-III biliary tract cancer.

M Maen Abdelrahim (Houston Methodist Neal Cancer Center, Houston, TX) A Abdullah Esmail (Houston Methodist Neal Cancer Center, Houston, TX) A Antony Tin L Lokesh Bathla (Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX) C Catherine Bridges (5Natera, Inc., Austin, United States) C Chris M. Brewer (Natera, Inc., Austin, TX) J Jenifer Ferguson (Natera, Inc., Austin, TX) J James Yu (Department of GI Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) A Aiwu Ruth He (Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY) T Timothy Lewis Cannon (Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA) A Arthur Winer (Inova Dwight and Martha Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA) G Gentry Teng King (University of Washington Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA) A Amit Mahipal (Department of Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH) A Arun Nagarajan J Joseph Wang Franses (University of Chicago Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL) M Midhun Malla M Michael M. Khayat (Natera, Inc., Austin, TX) A Adham A Jurdi (Natera, Inc., Austin, TX) M Minetta C. Liu R Richard D. Kim (Moffitt Cancer Center Magnolia Campus, Tampa, FL)

Abstract

4130 Background: Growing evidence supports the prognostic and predictive value of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection in gastrointestinal cancers. Building on previous work that demonstrated the feasibility of tumor-informed ctDNA testing in biliary tract cancer (BTC), this study aimed to evaluate ctDNA as a tool for detecting molecular residual disease (MRD) following curative resection and monitor recurrence during surveillance. Methods: A retrospective analysis of real-world data was performed on patients (N=171) with stage I-III resectable BTC who underwent ctDNA analysis using a personalized, tumor-informed 16-plex mPCR-NGS assay (Signatera; Natera, Inc.) from July 2020-February 2024. Plasma samples (n=769) were collected pre-operatively, postsurgically (within 2 to 12-weeks; MRD window), and longitudinally until death or last follow-up (surveillance window). The prognostic value of ctDNA was compared to traditional biomarkers such as CA19-9 and CEA. Results: A total of 171 patients with stage I-III BTC with a median age of 68 years (range 27-92) were included in this analysis. The median follow-up was 21 months (range: 2-97 months). ctDNA detection rates during the MRD and surveillance windows were 22% (18/83) and 32% (35/109), respectively. On evaluating clinical outcomes, ctDNA-positivity during MRD and surveillance was significantly associated with inferior disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Multivariate analysis confirmed ctDNA-positivity to be the most significant prognostic factor associated with DFS (HR: 10.91, 95%CI: 3.85-30.9, P<0.001) when adjusted for other clinicopathologic factors such as BTC subtype or tumor grade. Additionally, other biomarkers such as CA 19-9 and CEA did not predict clinical outcomes at either the MRD or surveillance windows (Table). Conclusions: The data show that ctDNA-positivity was associated with poor DFS and OS, both in the post-op and surveillance settings and that ctDNA detection using a personalized, mPCR-NGS assay was superior to current clinical biomarkers. These findings highlight the value of ctDNA monitoring to improve prognostication in BTC. Association of biomarkers with clinical outcomes. Biomarker MRD Surveillance ctDNADFS OS n= 83HR: 13.0, p < 0.001HR: 12.0, p < 0.001 n= 109HR: 6.1, p < 0.001HR: 17.8, p = 0.008 CA19-9DFSOS n= 53HR: 0.88, p =0.81HR: 1.9, p = 0.389 n= 80HR: 1.3, p = 0.51HR: 10.1, p = 0.045 CEADFSOS n= 18HR: 0.84, p = 0.85HR: 1.7, p = 0.71 n= 18HR: 0.54, p = 0.5HR: Not evaluable

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 4130-4130
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

M

Maen Abdelrahim

Houston Methodist Neal Cancer Center, Houston, TX

A

Abdullah Esmail

Houston Methodist Neal Cancer Center, Houston, TX

A

Antony Tin

L

Lokesh Bathla

Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX

C

Catherine Bridges

5Natera, Inc., Austin, United States

C

Chris M. Brewer

Natera, Inc., Austin, TX

J

Jenifer Ferguson

Natera, Inc., Austin, TX

J

James Yu

Department of GI Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

A

Aiwu Ruth He

Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY

T

Timothy Lewis Cannon

Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA

A

Arthur Winer

Inova Dwight and Martha Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA

G

Gentry Teng King

University of Washington Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA

A

Amit Mahipal

Department of Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH

A

Arun Nagarajan

J

Joseph Wang Franses

University of Chicago Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL

M

Midhun Malla

M

Michael M. Khayat

Natera, Inc., Austin, TX

A

Adham A Jurdi

Natera, Inc., Austin, TX

M

Minetta C. Liu

R

Richard D. Kim

Moffitt Cancer Center Magnolia Campus, Tampa, FL