Real-world analysis of ctDNA and other biomarkers in patients with curatively resected stage I-III biliary tract cancer.
Abstract
4130 Background: Growing evidence supports the prognostic and predictive value of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection in gastrointestinal cancers. Building on previous work that demonstrated the feasibility of tumor-informed ctDNA testing in biliary tract cancer (BTC), this study aimed to evaluate ctDNA as a tool for detecting molecular residual disease (MRD) following curative resection and monitor recurrence during surveillance. Methods: A retrospective analysis of real-world data was performed on patients (N=171) with stage I-III resectable BTC who underwent ctDNA analysis using a personalized, tumor-informed 16-plex mPCR-NGS assay (Signatera; Natera, Inc.) from July 2020-February 2024. Plasma samples (n=769) were collected pre-operatively, postsurgically (within 2 to 12-weeks; MRD window), and longitudinally until death or last follow-up (surveillance window). The prognostic value of ctDNA was compared to traditional biomarkers such as CA19-9 and CEA. Results: A total of 171 patients with stage I-III BTC with a median age of 68 years (range 27-92) were included in this analysis. The median follow-up was 21 months (range: 2-97 months). ctDNA detection rates during the MRD and surveillance windows were 22% (18/83) and 32% (35/109), respectively. On evaluating clinical outcomes, ctDNA-positivity during MRD and surveillance was significantly associated with inferior disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Multivariate analysis confirmed ctDNA-positivity to be the most significant prognostic factor associated with DFS (HR: 10.91, 95%CI: 3.85-30.9, P<0.001) when adjusted for other clinicopathologic factors such as BTC subtype or tumor grade. Additionally, other biomarkers such as CA 19-9 and CEA did not predict clinical outcomes at either the MRD or surveillance windows (Table). Conclusions: The data show that ctDNA-positivity was associated with poor DFS and OS, both in the post-op and surveillance settings and that ctDNA detection using a personalized, mPCR-NGS assay was superior to current clinical biomarkers. These findings highlight the value of ctDNA monitoring to improve prognostication in BTC. Association of biomarkers with clinical outcomes. Biomarker MRD Surveillance ctDNADFS OS n= 83HR: 13.0, p < 0.001HR: 12.0, p < 0.001 n= 109HR: 6.1, p < 0.001HR: 17.8, p = 0.008 CA19-9DFSOS n= 53HR: 0.88, p =0.81HR: 1.9, p = 0.389 n= 80HR: 1.3, p = 0.51HR: 10.1, p = 0.045 CEADFSOS n= 18HR: 0.84, p = 0.85HR: 1.7, p = 0.71 n= 18HR: 0.54, p = 0.5HR: Not evaluable
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Maen Abdelrahim
Houston Methodist Neal Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Abdullah Esmail
Houston Methodist Neal Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Antony Tin
Lokesh Bathla
Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX
Catherine Bridges
5Natera, Inc., Austin, United States
Chris M. Brewer
Natera, Inc., Austin, TX
Jenifer Ferguson
Natera, Inc., Austin, TX
James Yu
Department of GI Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Aiwu Ruth He
Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
Timothy Lewis Cannon
Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA
Arthur Winer
Inova Dwight and Martha Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA
Gentry Teng King
University of Washington Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
Amit Mahipal
Department of Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
Arun Nagarajan
Joseph Wang Franses
University of Chicago Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL
Midhun Malla
Michael M. Khayat
Natera, Inc., Austin, TX
Adham A Jurdi
Natera, Inc., Austin, TX
Minetta C. Liu
Richard D. Kim
Moffitt Cancer Center Magnolia Campus, Tampa, FL