Reactive Carbide‐Based Synthesis and Microstructure of NASICON Sodium Metal All Solid‐State Electrolyte
Abstract
Abstract Reactive carbide precursor‐based synthesis of NASICON‐type NZSP (Na 1+x Zr 2 Si x P 3‐x O 12 ) solid‐state electrolyte (SSE) is demonstrated, in contrast to the established oxide‐based approach. Exothermic decomposition of ZrC and SiC in air homogenizes microstructure, yielding 98% compact density after conventional sintering at 1200 °C. Quantitative stereology demonstrates that significant microstructural differences are present. Compacts of carbide‐derived Carb‐NZSP are 98% dense with a secondary zirconium oxide (ZrO 2 ) volume fraction of 0.2% ± 0.3%, versus 93% dense and 3% ± 1% for oxide‐derived baseline. For Carb‐NZSP, the secondary glassy phosphate phase is agglomerated, while for baseline, it is dispersed and percolated. Electrochemical testing combined with post‐mortem analysis demonstrates how microstructural control of secondary phases is critical for dendrite suppression: Carb‐NZSP critical current density (CCD) is 3.1 ± 0.8 mA cm − 2 at 0.1 mAh cm − 2 , versus 1.0 ± 0.7 mA cm −2 at 0.1 mAh cm −2 . Cryogenic focused ion beam (cryo‐FIB) analysis demonstrates that in both materials, the porous 2D sheet‐like sodium metal dendrites propagate around and subsume NZSP grains, likely following a path enriched with glassy phase and with porosity. Dendrites also flow around isolated zirconia particles. Phase field simulation reveals deflection of dendrites by mechanically tough zirconia, while brittle glassy phase accelerates dendrite growth, especially when finely distributed.
Article Details
Authors (11)
Callum J. Campbell
Materials Science and Engineering Program & Texas Materials Institute (TMI) The University of Texas at Austin Austin TX 78712 USA
Scott Monismith
Power Sources Technology Group Sandia National Laboratory Albuquerque NM 87185 USA
Vikalp Raj
Materials Science and Engineering Program & Texas Materials Institute (TMI) The University of Texas at Austin Austin TX 78712 USA
Yixian Wang
School of Chemical Engineering & Technology, Key Laboratory for Green Chemical Technology of Ministry of Education
Qianqian Yan
School of Marine Technology and Equipment, State Key Laboratory of Tropic Ocean Engineering Materials and Materials Evaluation, Hainan Provincial Key Lab of Fine Chem, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Cole D. Fincher
Rohit Raj
Yet‐Ming Chiang
Department of Materials Science & Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA 02139 USA
John Watt
Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos NM 87545 USA
Josefine D. McBrayer
Power Sources Technology Group Sandia National Laboratory Albuquerque NM 87185 USA
David Mitlin
Materials Science and Engineering Program Walker Department of Mechanical Engineering and Texas Materials Institute The University of Texas at Austin Austin TX 78712 USA