Re-evaluating the choice of gamma stimulation frequency for the potential treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: Novel invisible spectral flicker evokes gamma responses at various frequencies

M Mark Alexander Henney B Bianca Laura Hansen L Luna Skytte Hansen M Manja Gersholm Grønberg M Martin William Thorning-Schmidt H Henrik Enggaard Hansen M Mai Nguyen P Paul Michael Petersen L Line Katrine Harder Clemmensen (Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark) M Marcus Carstensen K Kristoffer Hougaard Madsen

Abstract

With recent advances in the potential usage of visual gamma stimulation at 40 Hz for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease, there is motivation to evaluate adjacent frequencies to ensure that specifically 40 Hz is optimal. As visual stimulation with luminance flicker may affect adherence in clinical trials due to its inherent perceived flickering, invisible spectral flicker (ISF) was proposed as a more comfortable alternative for entraining 40 Hz. Based on current understanding of the potential mechanism of action for 40 Hz stimulation, the exact frequency is debatable. This study investigates the ability of ISF to evoke acute gamma responses at several frequencies in the range of 36–44 Hz. Twenty healthy volunteers were included in an electroencephalography (EEG) experiment with ISF stimulation at nine different frequencies (36–44 Hz, 1 Hz interval). Estimated signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) showed that the cortical power was significantly increased at all stimulation frequencies compared to baseline, but with no significant difference in SNR between stimulation frequencies. There was a significant subject effect, suggesting that there is higher variability between subjects than between frequencies alone. Our results indicate that ISF can evoke steady-state potentials at several frequencies in the low gamma range of 36–44 Hz. Across the population of participants, no preference or trend for any specific gamma stimulation frequency in the tested range was found. While the subject-stimulus interaction was significant, it described little variance and showed no specific patterns for individual preference of frequency.

Article Details

Journal PLoS ONE
Volume / Issue Vol. 20, Issue 5
Published May 20, 2025
Pages e0321633
ISSN 1932-6203
Publisher Public Library of Science

Journal Info

PLoS ONE

Public Library of Science

ISSN: 1932-6203 Open Access Health Sciences

Authors (11)

M

Mark Alexander Henney

B

Bianca Laura Hansen

L

Luna Skytte Hansen

M

Manja Gersholm Grønberg

M

Martin William Thorning-Schmidt

H

Henrik Enggaard Hansen

M

Mai Nguyen

P

Paul Michael Petersen

L

Line Katrine Harder Clemmensen

Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark

M

Marcus Carstensen

K

Kristoffer Hougaard Madsen