Rational use of adjuvant anti-PD-1: Multi-omics model of recurrence in stage III melanoma.

T Tuba Nur Gide (Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia) N Nurudeen A. Adegoke M Michael Xie Y Yizhe Mao (Melanoma Institute Australia, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia) G Grace Heloise Attrill (Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia) N Nigel Maher (Melanoma Institute Australia, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia) R Robyn P.M. Saw I Ismael A. Vergara (Melanoma Institute Australia, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia) M Matteo S. Carlino (From the Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center (J.D.W.) and the Department of Medicine (J.D.W., M.A.P.), Weill Cornell Medicine, and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (M.A.P.) — both in New York; Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padua (V.C.-S.), European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan (P.Q.), Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, IRCCS, Meldola (M.G.), University of Siena and the Center for Immuno-Oncology, University Hospital of Siena, Siena (M.M.), and Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples (P.A.A.) — all in Italy; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland (P.R.); Texas Oncology–Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas (C.L.C.); University Hospital Essen, the German Cancer Consortium, the National Center for Tumor Diseases–West, the Research Alliance Ruhr, Research Center One Health, and University Duisburg-Essen — all in Essen, Germany (D.S.); the College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea (J.W.), Brist...) S Serigne N. Lo I Ines Esteves Domingues Pires da Silva (Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia) J Jorja Braden (Melanoma Institute Australia, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia) A Alexander M. Menzies R Richard A. Scolyer G Georgina V. Long J James S. Wilmott

Abstract

9569 Background: Stage III melanoma patients (pts) undergoing adjuvant anti-PD-1 immunotherapy have a high risk of recurrence (43% within one year) and treatment-related adverse events (25% severe). This study developed multi-omics models that accurately identify pts at high risk of recurrence who may benefit from alternative treatment strategies or closer surveillance. Methods: We analyzed a cohort of 131 pts with stage III melanoma (47% IIIA/B and 53% IIIC/D) who received adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy. The nodal burden was micrometastatic (35%) and macrometastatic (54%), with in-transit metastases in 11% of pts. Comprehensive multi-omics profiling included DNA sequencing (tumor mutational burden [TMB]), whole-transcriptome sequencing (gene expression profiling [GEP]), and multiplex immunohistochemistry (tumor microenvironment [TME]) of the baseline tumor sample. We developed predictive models for 12-month recurrence using multivariable penalized logistic regression with consensus-nested cross-validation incorporating clinical, TMB, GEP, and TME features. Internal validation was performed using optimism bias through 500 bootstrap iterations. Results: Clinical factors (nodal burden, stage, and site of primary melanoma) alone achieved a modest AUC of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.56-0.75) for predicting recurrence. Addition of TME features, particularly CD16+ cells interacting with PD-L1+CD16+ macrophages, significantly improved predictive accuracy (AUC: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.72-0.91). Further enhancements were observed with TMB and BRAF mutation status (AUC: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.74-0.92) and GEP-derived natural killer (NK) cell and interferon-gamma (IFNg) signatures (AUC: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.73-0.93). A consensus model integrating these features achieved an optimal AUC of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.78-0.94). This model demonstrated robust performance across macroscopic (AUC: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.78-0.98) and microscopic (AUC: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.70-1.00) nodal diseases. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the potential of multi-omics profiling to significantly enhance recurrence risk prediction in stage III melanoma pts receiving adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy. We developed a robust model with high predictive accuracy by integrating clinical data with TME, TMB, and GEP features (AUC, 0.86). This model can help identify pts at high risk of recurrence who may benefit from alternative treatment strategies or closer surveillance. AUC scores of various models. Model AUC Clinical 0.66 Clinical+TME 0.81 Clinical+TMB 0.83 Clinical+GEP 0.83 Consensus Model 0.86

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 9569-9569
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (16)

T

Tuba Nur Gide

Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

N

Nurudeen A. Adegoke

M

Michael Xie

Y

Yizhe Mao

Melanoma Institute Australia, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

G

Grace Heloise Attrill

Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

N

Nigel Maher

Melanoma Institute Australia, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

R

Robyn P.M. Saw

I

Ismael A. Vergara

Melanoma Institute Australia, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

M

Matteo S. Carlino

From the Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center (J.D.W.) and the Department of Medicine (J.D.W., M.A.P.), Weill Cornell Medicine, and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (M.A.P.) — both in New York; Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padua (V.C.-S.), European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan (P.Q.), Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, IRCCS, Meldola (M.G.), University of Siena and the Center for Immuno-Oncology, University Hospital of Siena, Siena (M.M.), and Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples (P.A.A.) — all in Italy; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland (P.R.); Texas Oncology–Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas (C.L.C.); University Hospital Essen, the German Cancer Consortium, the National Center for Tumor Diseases–West, the Research Alliance Ruhr, Research Center One Health, and University Duisburg-Essen — all in Essen, Germany (D.S.); the College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea (J.W.), Brist...

S

Serigne N. Lo

I

Ines Esteves Domingues Pires da Silva

Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

J

Jorja Braden

Melanoma Institute Australia, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

A

Alexander M. Menzies

R

Richard A. Scolyer

G

Georgina V. Long

J

James S. Wilmott