Rational use of adjuvant anti-PD-1: Multi-omics model of recurrence in stage III melanoma.
Abstract
9569 Background: Stage III melanoma patients (pts) undergoing adjuvant anti-PD-1 immunotherapy have a high risk of recurrence (43% within one year) and treatment-related adverse events (25% severe). This study developed multi-omics models that accurately identify pts at high risk of recurrence who may benefit from alternative treatment strategies or closer surveillance. Methods: We analyzed a cohort of 131 pts with stage III melanoma (47% IIIA/B and 53% IIIC/D) who received adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy. The nodal burden was micrometastatic (35%) and macrometastatic (54%), with in-transit metastases in 11% of pts. Comprehensive multi-omics profiling included DNA sequencing (tumor mutational burden [TMB]), whole-transcriptome sequencing (gene expression profiling [GEP]), and multiplex immunohistochemistry (tumor microenvironment [TME]) of the baseline tumor sample. We developed predictive models for 12-month recurrence using multivariable penalized logistic regression with consensus-nested cross-validation incorporating clinical, TMB, GEP, and TME features. Internal validation was performed using optimism bias through 500 bootstrap iterations. Results: Clinical factors (nodal burden, stage, and site of primary melanoma) alone achieved a modest AUC of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.56-0.75) for predicting recurrence. Addition of TME features, particularly CD16+ cells interacting with PD-L1+CD16+ macrophages, significantly improved predictive accuracy (AUC: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.72-0.91). Further enhancements were observed with TMB and BRAF mutation status (AUC: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.74-0.92) and GEP-derived natural killer (NK) cell and interferon-gamma (IFNg) signatures (AUC: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.73-0.93). A consensus model integrating these features achieved an optimal AUC of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.78-0.94). This model demonstrated robust performance across macroscopic (AUC: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.78-0.98) and microscopic (AUC: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.70-1.00) nodal diseases. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the potential of multi-omics profiling to significantly enhance recurrence risk prediction in stage III melanoma pts receiving adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy. We developed a robust model with high predictive accuracy by integrating clinical data with TME, TMB, and GEP features (AUC, 0.86). This model can help identify pts at high risk of recurrence who may benefit from alternative treatment strategies or closer surveillance. AUC scores of various models. Model AUC Clinical 0.66 Clinical+TME 0.81 Clinical+TMB 0.83 Clinical+GEP 0.83 Consensus Model 0.86
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (16)
Tuba Nur Gide
Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Nurudeen A. Adegoke
Michael Xie
Yizhe Mao
Melanoma Institute Australia, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Grace Heloise Attrill
Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Nigel Maher
Melanoma Institute Australia, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Robyn P.M. Saw
Ismael A. Vergara
Melanoma Institute Australia, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Matteo S. Carlino
From the Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center (J.D.W.) and the Department of Medicine (J.D.W., M.A.P.), Weill Cornell Medicine, and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (M.A.P.) — both in New York; Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padua (V.C.-S.), European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan (P.Q.), Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, IRCCS, Meldola (M.G.), University of Siena and the Center for Immuno-Oncology, University Hospital of Siena, Siena (M.M.), and Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples (P.A.A.) — all in Italy; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland (P.R.); Texas Oncology–Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas (C.L.C.); University Hospital Essen, the German Cancer Consortium, the National Center for Tumor Diseases–West, the Research Alliance Ruhr, Research Center One Health, and University Duisburg-Essen — all in Essen, Germany (D.S.); the College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea (J.W.), Brist...
Serigne N. Lo
Ines Esteves Domingues Pires da Silva
Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Jorja Braden
Melanoma Institute Australia, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Alexander M. Menzies
Richard A. Scolyer
Georgina V. Long
James S. Wilmott