Rational Design of CDK12/13 and BRD4 Molecular Glue Degraders

Z Zhe Zhuang (Department of Chemical and Systems Biology, ChEM-H and Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford Medical School) W Woong Sub Byun (Department of Chemical and Systems Biology, ChEM-H, and Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford School of Medicine) Z Zuzanna Kozicka (Department of Medical Oncology) K Katherine A. Donovan B Brendan G. Dwyer (Department of Chemical and Systems Biology, ChEM-H, and Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford School of Medicine) A Abby M. Thornhill (Department of Cancer Biology) H Hannah M. Jones (Department of Chemical and Systems Biology, ChEM-H, and Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford School of Medicine) Z Zixuan Jiang (Department of Chemical and Systems Biology, ChEM-H, and Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford School of Medicine) X Xijun Zhu E Eric S. Fischer N Nicolas H. Thomä N Nathanael S. Gray

Abstract

Abstract Targeted protein degradation (TPD) is an emerging therapeutic approach for the selective elimination of disease‐related proteins. While molecular glue degraders exhibit drug‐like properties, their discovery has traditionally been serendipitous and often requires post hoc rationalization. In this study, we demonstrate the rational, mechanism‐guided design of molecular glue degraders using gluing moieties. Building on established principles, by appending a chemical gluing moiety to several small molecule inhibitors, we successfully transformed them into degraders, obviating the need for a specific E3 ubiquitin ligase recruiter. Specifically, we found that incorporating a hydrophobic aromatic ring or a double bond into a cyclin‐dependent kinase 12 and 13 (CDK12/13) dual inhibitor enabled the recruitment of DNA damage‐binding protein 1 (DDB1), thereby transforming a high‐molecular‐weight bivalent CDK12 degrader into a potent monovalent CDK12/13 molecular glue degrader. We also showcase that attaching a cysteine‐reactive warhead to a bromodomain‐containing protein 4 (BRD4) inhibitor converts it into a degrader by recruiting the DDB1 and CUL4‐associated factor 16 (DCAF16) E3 ligase.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 64, Issue 38
Published September 15, 2025
ISSN 1433-7851
Publisher Wiley

Journal Info

Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Wiley

ISSN: 1433-7851 Physical Sciences

Authors (12)

Z

Zhe Zhuang

Department of Chemical and Systems Biology, ChEM-H and Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford Medical School

W

Woong Sub Byun

Department of Chemical and Systems Biology, ChEM-H, and Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford School of Medicine

Z

Zuzanna Kozicka

Department of Medical Oncology

K

Katherine A. Donovan

B

Brendan G. Dwyer

Department of Chemical and Systems Biology, ChEM-H, and Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford School of Medicine

A

Abby M. Thornhill

Department of Cancer Biology

H

Hannah M. Jones

Department of Chemical and Systems Biology, ChEM-H, and Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford School of Medicine

Z

Zixuan Jiang

Department of Chemical and Systems Biology, ChEM-H, and Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford School of Medicine

X

Xijun Zhu

E

Eric S. Fischer

N

Nicolas H. Thomä

N

Nathanael S. Gray