Randomized Phase II Trial of Pazopanib Versus Placebo in Patients With Advanced Extrapancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (Alliance A021202)

E Emily K. Bergsland (University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) S Susan Geyer (Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN) T Timothy R. Asmis (The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada) S Spencer C. Behr (Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) J J. Philip Kuebler (Columbus NCI Community Oncology Research Program, Columbus, OH) P Priya Kumthekar G Gina Mazza (Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN) M Michael L. Maitland (Inova Schar Cancer Institute and the University of Virginia Comprehensive Cancer Center, Falls Church, VA) D Donna Niedzwiecki A Andrew B. Nixon (Division of Medical Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC) L Lawrence Howard Schwartz (Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY) J Jonathan R. Strosberg (Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL) A Alan P. Venook (University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) E Eileen M. O'Reilly (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY) J Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt

Abstract

PURPOSE Patients with advanced, well-differentiated extrapancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (epNETs) have limited systemic treatment options. Pazopanib, an oral multikinase inhibitor with activity against vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-2 and -3, PDGFR-alpha and-beta, and c-Kit, was tested for efficacy in epNET. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase II study of pazopanib (800 mg once daily) versus placebo in low- to intermediate-grade epNET with radiologic progressive disease (PD) within 12 months of study entry. Previous somatostatin analog (SSA) was required for midgut tumors, and concurrent SSA was allowed. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review. Unblinding and crossover were allowed if PD was confirmed by central review. RESULTS One hundred seventy-one patients (97 pazopanib and 74 placebo) were randomly assigned between September 2013 and October 2015. The majority had a midgut primary site (75%) and previous SSA treatment (93%). About half (49%) of the patients had functional tumors. The median follow-up was 61 months (95% CI, 60 to 63). Median PFS was 11.8 versus 7.6 months in pazopanib versus placebo, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.37 to 0.79]; P < .001); 49 placebo patients crossed over to pazopanib. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the treatment arms. Rates of grade 3 or greater adverse events (regardless of attribution) were higher in pazopanib versus placebo (84% v 47%; P < .001), as were grade 5 death events (8% v 0%, P = .017). CONCLUSION Pazopanib compared with placebo significantly improves PFS in patients with progressive epNET, confirming that the VEGF signaling pathway is a valid target for therapy in epNET. However, after integrating the associated risks relative to the benefits, further development of pazopanib in this clinical context is not planned.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 29
Published October 10, 2025
Pages 3170-3183
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (15)

E

Emily K. Bergsland

University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

S

Susan Geyer

Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

T

Timothy R. Asmis

The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada

S

Spencer C. Behr

Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

J

J. Philip Kuebler

Columbus NCI Community Oncology Research Program, Columbus, OH

P

Priya Kumthekar

G

Gina Mazza

Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

M

Michael L. Maitland

Inova Schar Cancer Institute and the University of Virginia Comprehensive Cancer Center, Falls Church, VA

D

Donna Niedzwiecki

A

Andrew B. Nixon

Division of Medical Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC

L

Lawrence Howard Schwartz

Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

J

Jonathan R. Strosberg

Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL

A

Alan P. Venook

University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

E

Eileen M. O'Reilly

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY

J

Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt