Quantitative pre-cystectomy ctDNA levels for identification of ctDNA-positive patients with surgically curable loco-regional disease versus those with occult micrometastatic progression.

R Ruveyda Ayasun (Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA, New York, NY) E Eric James Miller (Mount Sinai Tisch Cancer Center, New York, NY) L Lexi S. Weintraub (Mount Sinai Tisch Cancer Center, New York, NY) L Lydia Wu (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY) A Anna Argulian (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY) A Annabelle Elikan (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY) T Thomas Joseph Otten (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY) E Erin Heath (Mount Sinai Tisch Cancer Center, New York, NY) T Teja Ganta (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY) S Saad Omar Atiq (Mount Sinai Tisch Cancer Center, New York, NY) J Jonathan F. Anker (Mount Sinai Tisch Cancer Center, New York, NY) M Marcio A. Diniz (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY) M Matthew D. Galsky (Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai) A Alexander B. Karol (Mount Sinai Tisch Cancer Cancer, New York, NY)

Abstract

4577 Background: Radical cystectomy (RC) is a life-altering operation associated with substantial morbidity. Despite its curative intent for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC), approximately 50% of patients experience metastatic recurrence after surgery. Identifying patients destined to relapse despite RC could help spare them from the morbidity of surgery and instead direct them toward alternative systemic therapies. While ctDNA-positive assays post-neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) but pre-cystectomy are associated with a poor prognosis, a subset of patients with ctDNA positive assays pre-cystectomy “clear” ctDNA with cystectomy alone (Powles, ASCO, 2025). We hypothesized that quantitative pre-cystectomy ctDNA thresholds may therefore distinguish local, surgically curable, bladder cancer versus micrometastatic disease. Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-institution cohort study of patients undergoing RC who had tumor-informed ctDNA (Signatera) assays ≤60 days pre-surgery and within ±30 days of a 3-month postoperative landmark. The primary outcome was ctDNA positivity at this landmark. The analyses proceeded in two steps: (1) association between log-transformed pre-cystectomy ctDNA and 3-month ctDNA positivity, assessed using logistic regression; and (2) derivation of the maximal quantitative preoperative ctDNA threshold >0.02 Mean Tumor Molecules per Milliliter (MTM/ml) using constrained optimization (target sensitivity ≥80%, specificity ≥50%), with internal validation via Efron-Gong bootstrap resampling. Results: Of 45 patients with MIUC meeting inclusion criteria, 10 (22.2%) received NAT. Higher pre-cystectomy ctDNA correlated with ctDNA positivity at the post-cystectomy landmark timepoint (odds ratio per 10-fold increase 1.6, 95% CI 1.2–2.4; p=<0.01). A pre-cystectomy ctDNA threshold ≥0.06 MTM/ml (95% CI 0.04–2.475) demonstrated optimal performance characteristics and was confirmed on bootstrap validation (sensitivity 81.6% [95% CI 61.1–88.9%], specificity 66.4% [95% CI 51.9–96.3%], positive predictive value [PPV] 63.8% [95% CI 55.2–91.7%], and negative predictive value [NPV] 85.1% [95% CI 78.8–88.9%]). Conclusions: Higher pre-cystectomy ctDNA values correlate with a higher likelihood of a persistent ctDNA-positive assay at 3 months post-cystectomy. In this dataset, a ctDNA threshold of ≥0.06 MTM/ml identified patients with high sensitivity and NPV for post-operative micrometastatic disease. Further validation of these findings, and threshold, in larger cohorts (with or without NAT) are needed to refine MIUC care by testing strategies involving (alternative) NAT versus proceeding with cystectomy.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 4577-4577
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (14)

R

Ruveyda Ayasun

Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA, New York, NY

E

Eric James Miller

Mount Sinai Tisch Cancer Center, New York, NY

L

Lexi S. Weintraub

Mount Sinai Tisch Cancer Center, New York, NY

L

Lydia Wu

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY

A

Anna Argulian

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY

A

Annabelle Elikan

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY

T

Thomas Joseph Otten

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY

E

Erin Heath

Mount Sinai Tisch Cancer Center, New York, NY

T

Teja Ganta

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY

S

Saad Omar Atiq

Mount Sinai Tisch Cancer Center, New York, NY

J

Jonathan F. Anker

Mount Sinai Tisch Cancer Center, New York, NY

M

Marcio A. Diniz

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY

M

Matthew D. Galsky

Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

A

Alexander B. Karol

Mount Sinai Tisch Cancer Cancer, New York, NY