Quantitative CT lung fibrosis and immune checkpoint inhibitor–related pneumonitis in NSCLC.

M Mitchell Boshkos (1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Division of Internal Medicine, Houston, United States) A Amgad Muneer (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) E Eman Showkatian (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) F Felipe Soto (1Indiana University, Department of Internal Medicine, Indianapolis, United States) F Ferando Camacho (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) G Gregory Gaskey (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) M Mazen Aiche (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) S Sarah Forsythe (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) K Karthik Suresh (Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD) R Rupali Sood (Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD) M Mohammad I. Ghanbar (Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD) S Samuel Peterson (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) J Joshua Schirm (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) K Kevin Ho (Ohio State University, Columbus, OH) G Girish Shroff (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) A Aung Naing (Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) S Saadia Faiz (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) J Jia Wu M Mehmet Altan A Ajay Sheshadri

Abstract

e20531 Background: Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) are established risk factors for immune checkpoint inhibitor–related pneumonitis (ICI-P), but qualitative ILA assessment is subjective. We evaluated whether quantitative lung fibrosis (QLF) metrics from pretreatment computed tomography (CT) are associated with ICI-P in patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 241 patients with metastatic NSCLC treated with ICIs. Pretreatment CT scans underwent quantitative analysis using commercial software (VIDA) to extract QLFs representing consolidation, ground-glass opacity (GGO), emphysema, reticulation, and honeycombing. QLFs were quantified by percentage, volume, and estimated mass at total lung, lobar (upper vs lower), and subregional (core [central] vs peel [peripheral]) levels. Associations between QLFs and ICI-P were evaluated using univariate logistic regression. Results: Regional QLFs demonstrated differential associations with ICI-P. Upper-lobe QLFs were not associated with pneumonitis (all p≥0.13). In contrast, lower-lobe mass-based fibrosis metrics were associated with increased ICI-P risk, including GGO mass (OR 1.005, 95% CI 1.001–1.010; p=0.030), quantitative ILD (QILD) mass (OR 1.004, 95% CI 1.000–1.008; p=0.031), and quantitative ILA (QILA) mass (OR 1.004, 95% CI 1.001–1.007; p=0.024). Total-lung QILA mass showed a trend toward association (OR 1.002, 95% CI 1.000–1.004; p=0.086). Subregional analysis demonstrated stronger associations in peripheral (peel) regions; peel consolidation volume was associated with ICI-P (OR 1.102, 95% CI 1.013–1.198; p=0.023), whereas no core metric reached significance. Conclusions: Quantitative fibrosis metrics from pretreatment CT, particularly lower-lobe and peripheral mass-based QLFs, are associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor–related pneumonitis in NSCLC. Incorporation of regional quantitative fibrosis measures into baseline imaging assessment may help identify patients at elevated pneumonitis risk and inform surveillance strategies. These findings support further multivariable validation of quantitative CT fibrosis metrics as imaging biomarkers for immunotherapy-related pneumonitis. Associations between quantitative lung fibrosis metrics and immune checkpoint inhibitor–related pneumonitis in NSCLC. Region Metric (Mass-based QLF) (gm) OR 95% CI p-value Lower lobe GGO Mass 1.005 1.001–1.010 0.030 Lower lobe QILD Mass 1.004 1.000–1.008 0.031 Lower lobe QILA Mass 1.004 1.001–1.007 0.024 Upper lobe No significant predictors — — ≥0.13 Total lung QILA Mass 1.002 1.000–1.004 0.086

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

M

Mitchell Boshkos

1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Division of Internal Medicine, Houston, United States

A

Amgad Muneer

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

E

Eman Showkatian

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

F

Felipe Soto

1Indiana University, Department of Internal Medicine, Indianapolis, United States

F

Ferando Camacho

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

G

Gregory Gaskey

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

M

Mazen Aiche

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

S

Sarah Forsythe

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

K

Karthik Suresh

Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

R

Rupali Sood

Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD

M

Mohammad I. Ghanbar

Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

S

Samuel Peterson

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

J

Joshua Schirm

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

K

Kevin Ho

Ohio State University, Columbus, OH

G

Girish Shroff

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

A

Aung Naing

Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

S

Saadia Faiz

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

J

Jia Wu

M

Mehmet Altan

A

Ajay Sheshadri