Quantitative assessment of tumor shedding using AI-derived radiographic tumor burden and quantified liquid biopsy in advanced gastrointestinal cancers.

A Abdul Qahar K. Yasinzai (University of Florida/UF Health Cancer Institute, Gainesville, FL) D Derek Li (John R. Wingard, MD, Ji-Hyun Lee, DrPH, and Derek Li, MS, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL) I Ilyas Sahin (Mass General Brigham Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) D Doga Kahramangil (University of Florida/UF Health Cancer Institute, Gainesville, FL) P Pravalika Manda (University of Florida/UF Health Cancer Institute, Gainesville, FL) L Lee D. McDaniel (BillionToOne, Inc., Menlo Park, CA) M Maegan Cremer (University of Florida/UF Health Cancer Institute, Gainesville, FL) G Gahyun Gim (University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL) G George P. Kim (University of Florida/UF Health Cancer Institute, Gainesville, FL) S Sherise C. Rogers (University of Florida/UF Health Cancer Institute, Gainesville, FL) B Brian Hemendra Ramnaraign (University of Florida/UF Health Cancer Institute, Gainesville, FL) M Matthew Gordon Varga (BillionToOne, Inc., Menlo Park, CA) M Meghan Ferrall-Fairbanks (4University of Florida, Gainesville, United States) B Bruno Hochhegger (University of Florida/UF Health Cancer Institute, Gainesville, FL) K Kyle B. See (University of Florida/UF Health Cancer Institute, Gainesville, FL) J Ji-Hyun Lee T Thomas J. George

Abstract

3063 Background: Radiographic imaging remains the clinical standard for assessing cancer treatment response; however, it lacks sensitivity to detect early biological shifts and spatially heterogeneous tumor behavior. Methylated circulating tumor DNA (mctDNA) provides a complementary molecular measure of disease burden, yet the quantitative relationship between radiographic tumor burden and DNA shedding remains poorly characterized. In this cohort study, we evaluated whether early changes in shed rate predict progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Methods: Patients with advanced GI malignancies receiving systemic therapies underwent paired longitudinal radiographic and liquid biopsy assessments. Radiographic tumor burden was quantified (OSCAR AI platform). Tumor contours were independently blinded reviewed by two radiologists. Up to 15 target lesions per organ were selected, and the total tumor burden was calculated analogous to longitudinal RECIST assessment. Tumor Methylation Score (TMS) from the Northstar Response assay quantified mctDNA. Tumor shed rate (TSR) was defined as the ratio of TMS to the AI-derived radiographic tumor volume and calculated at baseline and at the first on-treatment landmark using the closest-paired CT scan and blood drawn within 120 days. Fold-change in TSR from baseline was compared with PFS and OS. Undetectable tumor volume cases were excluded. Results: Forty patients were evaluable, with both baseline and landmark timepoints available within the 120-day window. TSR ranged from a min of 0 methylated molecules per mm 3 (m4) to a max of 1.0 m4 with a median of 0.06 m4. TSR significantly differed between tumor types (p=0.013, ANOVA), with CRC having the highest median shed rate (0.13 m4) and EGA and pancreatic having the lowest median shed rates (0 m4). TMS was significantly associated with tumor volume at baseline (Rsq=0.15,p=0.01, Deming) and on-treatment (Rsq=0.6, p<0.001, Deming). An increased TSR was associated with OS (HR=5.8, 95% CI 1.7-19.2, <0.01) and PFS (HR=3.5, 1.4-8.6, <0.01). Conclusions: TSR represents a novel, multidimensional integration of AI-driven volumetrics and liquid biopsy. Our findings suggest that an increasing shed rate is a predictor of PFS and OS, potentially serving as a lead-time indicator of tumor-host homeostatic decompensation. Future analysis will determine if TSR captures critical transitions in tumor biology that precede and perhaps drive radiographically detectable progression.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 3063-3063
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (17)

A

Abdul Qahar K. Yasinzai

University of Florida/UF Health Cancer Institute, Gainesville, FL

D

Derek Li

John R. Wingard, MD, Ji-Hyun Lee, DrPH, and Derek Li, MS, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL

I

Ilyas Sahin

Mass General Brigham Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

D

Doga Kahramangil

University of Florida/UF Health Cancer Institute, Gainesville, FL

P

Pravalika Manda

University of Florida/UF Health Cancer Institute, Gainesville, FL

L

Lee D. McDaniel

BillionToOne, Inc., Menlo Park, CA

M

Maegan Cremer

University of Florida/UF Health Cancer Institute, Gainesville, FL

G

Gahyun Gim

University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL

G

George P. Kim

University of Florida/UF Health Cancer Institute, Gainesville, FL

S

Sherise C. Rogers

University of Florida/UF Health Cancer Institute, Gainesville, FL

B

Brian Hemendra Ramnaraign

University of Florida/UF Health Cancer Institute, Gainesville, FL

M

Matthew Gordon Varga

BillionToOne, Inc., Menlo Park, CA

M

Meghan Ferrall-Fairbanks

4University of Florida, Gainesville, United States

B

Bruno Hochhegger

University of Florida/UF Health Cancer Institute, Gainesville, FL

K

Kyle B. See

University of Florida/UF Health Cancer Institute, Gainesville, FL

J

Ji-Hyun Lee

T

Thomas J. George