Quantifying patient preferences for bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) and PD-(L)1 inhibitors in high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC): A discrete choice experiment.

P Pam Hallworth (Adelphi Research, Bollington, United Kingdom) A Anthony Eccleston (Pfizer Ltd, Tadworth, United Kingdom) B Brad Mason (Adelphi Values Ltd, Patient-Centered Outcomes, Bollington, United Kingdom) B Brett Hauber (Pfizer Inc., New York, NY) B Bethany Bell (Adelphi Research, Bollington, United Kingdom) J Josh Coulter (4Pfizer Inc, New York, United States) L Lisa Marin (Adelphi Research, Doylestown, PA) A Allison Thompson (Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States) J Joe Jones (Adelphi Research, Doylestown, PA) J Jane Chang (Pfizer Inc., New York, NY) L Lara Ayala-Nunes (Adelphi Values Ltd, Patient-Centered Outcomes, Bollington, United Kingdom) J Julia Brinkmann (Pfizer Pharma GmbH, Berlin, Germany) C Carys Guest (Adelphi Research, Bollington, United Kingdom) A Adam Gater (Adelphi Values Ltd, Patient-Centered Outcomes, Bollington, United Kingdom) A Abin Koshy (Pfizer Inc., New York, NY) J Joseph C Cappelleri (8Pfizer Inc, Groton, United States) S Stephanie Chisolm (Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network, Bethesda, MD) R Raj Satkunasivam

Abstract

4579 Background: Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) induction + maintenance (I+M) is the standard of care for high-risk NMIBC. Disease recurrence and progression is common. The studies investigating programmed cell death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-[L]1) inhibitors + BCG aim to enhance treatment outcomes and reduce burden in BCG naïve high-risk NMIBC. There is limited evidence on patient preferences for these combination regimens. Methods: A discrete choice experiment quantified preferences for attribute levels related to BCG and PD-(L)1 inhibitors. Attributes and levels were informed by a literature review, patient interviews, regulatory scientific advice, clinical experts and a patient advocate. Patients completed hypothetical choice tasks describing administration mode and frequency for PD-(L)1 inhibitors and BCG (induction [I]; I+M), median event-free survival (EFS) and adverse events (AEs: bladder AEs; chronic endocrine conditions; serious immune AEs). Hierarchical Bayesian modelling estimated preference weights (PWs) for attribute levels. PWs identified level combinations with the lowest choice probability. Relative importance (RI) was calculated by systematically varying attribute levels and capturing the gain in choice probability. Results: 150 patients (77 BCG-naïve; 73 BCG-experienced) in the United States completed the survey. Clinician-confirmed diagnosis (17%) and/or self-reported ongoing or planned BCG I+M (99%) was obtained. The sample was 51% male, had a median age of 63 years (49-74) and diverse by race (Caucasian 46%; African American/Black 27%; Other 27%) and ethnicity (Hispanic/Latino/Spanish 21%). EFS was the most important attributes to patients (RI 17.2), followed by bladder AEs (RI 16.4) and serious immune AEs (RI 14.0). Administration attributes were important (RI 9-9.9), but less important than other attributes. PWs show that short duration ( < 1 minute) subcutaneous (SC) injections was the most preferred PD-(L)1 route and shorter BCG schedule was preferred. Conclusions: Findings highlight the value of prolonging EFS, effective clinical management of BCG AEs and reducing administration burden in future BCG + PD(L)1 regimens. Attribute Level Mean PW 95% CI (±) RI*(%) EFS (months) 362722 3.46-1.03-2.43 0.280.110.22 17.2 Bladder AEs (%) 03575 2.98-0.10-2.88 0.290.120.26 16.4 Serious immune AEs (%) 01020 1.40-0.09-1.31 0.220.090.18 14.0 Chronic endocrine conditions (%) 0510 0.99-0.08-0.91 0.150.080.16 12.6 PD-(L)1 frequency (weeks) 643 0.45-0.10-0.35 0.100.100.06 9.9 PD-(L)1 administration route and time SC <1 minuteSC 7-10 minutesIV 30-60 minutes 0.150.06-0.21 0.090.100.08 9.5 BCG schedule II+M 0.25-0.25 0.140.14 9.0 *Sums to 88.7. The remaining 11.3 corresponds to an attribute used for analysis only. CI: confidence interval; IV: intravenous infusion.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 4579-4579
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (18)

P

Pam Hallworth

Adelphi Research, Bollington, United Kingdom

A

Anthony Eccleston

Pfizer Ltd, Tadworth, United Kingdom

B

Brad Mason

Adelphi Values Ltd, Patient-Centered Outcomes, Bollington, United Kingdom

B

Brett Hauber

Pfizer Inc., New York, NY

B

Bethany Bell

Adelphi Research, Bollington, United Kingdom

J

Josh Coulter

4Pfizer Inc, New York, United States

L

Lisa Marin

Adelphi Research, Doylestown, PA

A

Allison Thompson

Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

J

Joe Jones

Adelphi Research, Doylestown, PA

J

Jane Chang

Pfizer Inc., New York, NY

L

Lara Ayala-Nunes

Adelphi Values Ltd, Patient-Centered Outcomes, Bollington, United Kingdom

J

Julia Brinkmann

Pfizer Pharma GmbH, Berlin, Germany

C

Carys Guest

Adelphi Research, Bollington, United Kingdom

A

Adam Gater

Adelphi Values Ltd, Patient-Centered Outcomes, Bollington, United Kingdom

A

Abin Koshy

Pfizer Inc., New York, NY

J

Joseph C Cappelleri

8Pfizer Inc, Groton, United States

S

Stephanie Chisolm

Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network, Bethesda, MD

R

Raj Satkunasivam