Quadruple adenine base–edited allogeneic CAR T cells outperform CRISPR/Cas9 nuclease–engineered T cells

N Nils W. Engel (Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania) I Israel Steinfeld (Agilent Research Laboratories) D Daniel Ryan (Agilent Research Laboratories) K Kusala Anupindi (Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania) S Samuel Kim (Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania) N Nils Wellhausen (Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine) L Linhui Chen (Institute for Biomedical Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania) K Katherine Wilkins (Agilent Research Laboratories) D Daniel J. Baker (Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania) P Philipp C. Rommel (Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania) D Danuta Jarocha (Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania) M Mercy Gohil (Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania) Q Qian Zhang M Michael C. Milone (Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania) J Joseph A. Fraietta (Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania) M Megan Davis (Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania) R Regina M. Young (Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine) C Carl H. June

Abstract

Genome-editing technologies have enabled the clinical development of allogeneic cellular therapies, yet the optimal gene-editing modality for multiplex editing of therapeutic T cell product manufacturing remains elusive. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive comparison of CRISPR/Cas9 nuclease and adenine base editor (ABE) technologies in generating allogeneic chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, utilizing extensive in vitro and in vivo analyses. Both methods achieved high editing efficiencies across four target genes, critical for mitigating graft-versus-host disease and allograft rejection: TRAC or CD3E , B2M , CIITA , and PVR . Notably, ABE demonstrated higher manufacturing yields and distinct off-target profiles compared to Cas9, with translocations observed exclusively in Cas9-edited products. Functionally, ABE-edited CAR T cells exhibited superior in vitro effector functions under continuous antigen stimulation, including enhanced proliferative capacity and increased surface CAR expression. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that ABE editing resulted in reduced activation of p53 and DNA damage response pathways at baseline, along with sustained activation of metabolic pathways during antigen stress. Consistently, Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin using sequencing data indicated that Cas9-edited, but not ABE-edited, CAR T cells showed enrichment of chromatin accessibility peaks associated with double-strand break repair and DNA damage response pathways. In a preclinical leukemia model, ABE-edited CAR T cells demonstrated improved tumor control and extended overall survival compared to their Cas9-edited counterparts. Collectively, these findings position ABE as superior to Cas9 nucleases for multiplex gene editing of therapeutic T cells.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 122, Issue 20
Published May 20, 2025
ISSN 0027-8424
Publisher National Academy of Sciences

Authors (18)

N

Nils W. Engel

Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania

I

Israel Steinfeld

Agilent Research Laboratories

D

Daniel Ryan

Agilent Research Laboratories

K

Kusala Anupindi

Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania

S

Samuel Kim

Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania

N

Nils Wellhausen

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine

L

Linhui Chen

Institute for Biomedical Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania

K

Katherine Wilkins

Agilent Research Laboratories

D

Daniel J. Baker

Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania

P

Philipp C. Rommel

Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania

D

Danuta Jarocha

Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania

M

Mercy Gohil

Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania

Q

Qian Zhang

M

Michael C. Milone

Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania

J

Joseph A. Fraietta

Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania

M

Megan Davis

Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania

R

Regina M. Young

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine

C

Carl H. June