QHRD107 (CDK9 Inhibitor), venetoclax, and azacitidine combination therapy (107VA regimen) in relapsed/refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Data updates and subgroup analysis
Abstract
Abstract Background: QHRD107, a potent CDK9 inhibitor, has demonstrated promising activity in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML). The 107VA regimen, a triple combination of QHRD107, venetoclax (VEN) and azacitidine (AZA), has showed favorable safety profile. With enrollment now completed, we report updated efficacy and long-term survival data. Methods: This phase 2a, open-label, multicenter study (NCT06532058) consisted of a dose escalation phase and expansion phase. Patients with R/R AML were enrolled and received QHRD107 at one of three dose levels (40 mg, 60 mg, or 80 mg, PO, Q12 hours, days 1-28 in combination with AZA (75 mg/m2, days 1-7) and VEN (400 mg with dose ramp-up, days 1-28). The primary objective of the dose escalation phase was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), while the expansion phase focused on assessing composite complete remission rate (cCR) and duration of response (DOR). Results: Between August 2023 and February 2025, a total of 61 patients underwent screening, with 53 included in the intention-to-treat population. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed during the dose escalation phase, establishing 80mg of QHRD107 twice daily as the MTD. Due to gastrointestinal toxicity, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive QHRD107 at 60mg or 80mg during the expansion phase. The median age of the cohort was 60 years (range: 19-80), with 24 (45.3%) patients being male. Cytogenetic information was available in 49 (92.5%) patients, and next-generation sequencing results were available in all patients. At baseline, 7 (13.2%) patients had a RUNX1::RUNX1T1 fusion gene, 8 (15.1%) had an NPM1 mutation, 10 (18.9%) had a CEBPA bZIP mutation, 5 (9.4%) had a FLT3-ITD mutation and 6 (11.3%) had a TP53 mutation. Seven patients (13.2%) were classified as AML with myelodysplasia-related gene mutations/cytogenetic abnormalities (AML-MR) according to 2022 ELN recommendation. A total of 39 (73.6%) patients had been previously exposed to BCL-2 inhibitors (venetoclax or sonrotoclax), with 35 (66.0%) being refractory or relapsed from VEN-AZA regimen. Three patients in the expansion phase terminated treatment before cycle 1 day 28. Response rates were similar between the 60 and 80mg groups, with no obvious dose-dependent trend. Among 50 efficacy-evaluable patients, the overall response rate (ORR) was 54.0% (CR: 4, CRh: 7, CRi: 9, MLFS: 4, PR: 3), with a cCR rate of 40.0%. Measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity by flow cytometry was achieved in 9 responding patients. Subgroup analysis revealed response differences among patients with different genotypes. Patients with TP53 mutation and AML-MR showed higher response rates, with ORR of 66.7% and 100%, respectively. In contrast, patients with solo NPM1 mutation or NPM1 and FLT3-ITD co-mutations showed lower response rates. Notably, patients who were refractory or relapsed from VEN-AZA treatment achieved high response rates, with cCR rate of 34.3% (12 of 35) and ORR of 54.3% (19 of 35). Among these patients, all 5 AML-MR patients and 4 TP53-mutated patients achieved treatment responses. Three (6%) patients proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplant and 2 patients received autologous stem cell transplant. The median overall survival (OS) was 12.9 months (95% CI: 5.4 to not reached) vs 13.5 months (95% CI: 3.5 to not reached) in the QHRD107 60mg and 80mg groups, respectively. Conclusions: The 107VA regimen demonstrated high response rates in VEN-AZA relapse or refractory AML, particularly in patients with TP53 mutations and myelodysplasia-related features. Based on these data, a phase 2b randomized controlled study comparing 107VA with other salvage regimens is currently being conducted for patients who relapse after VEN-AZA treatment.
Article Details
Authors (25)
Yunxiang Zhang
State Key Laboratory of Natural Product Chemistry, Key Laboratory of Nonferrous Metal Chemistry and Resources Utilization of Gansu Province, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Min Wu
Wen Wu
Zheng Ge
1Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
Ligen Liu
2Department of Hematology, Shanghai Tongren Hospital Affilated to Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
Chunyan Ji
Weiying Gu
4Department of Hematology, The First People’s Hospital of Changzhou, Third Affiliated to Suzhou University, Changzhou, China
Chunling Wang
Yanli Zhang
Wei Yang
Fuling Zhou
2Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Department of Hematology, Wuhan, China
Zhengping Yu
2Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Institute of Hematology Southeast University, Nanjing, China
Min Ji
Banghe Ding
6The Affiliated Huaian No.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University Department of Hematology, Huai'an, China
Shudong Wang
School of Physical Science and Technology, Inner Mongolia University 1 , Hohhot 010021,
Xiang Zhou
Lijun Wei
12Changzhou Qianhong Biopharma Co., Ltd., Changzhou, China
Hengwen Song
12Changzhou Qianhong Biopharma Co., Ltd., Changzhou, China
Yan Zhou
Bomin Yin
12Changzhou Qianhong Biopharma Co., Ltd., Changzhou, China
Zhichao Shao
Center for Advanced Materials Research
Mengdan Sun
12Changzhou Qianhong Biopharma Co., Ltd., Changzhou, China
Qi Jiang
Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Shanghai Advanced Research Institute
Junjie Lu
Junmin Li