PYNNACLE phase 2 clinical trial of rezatapopt in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring a <i>TP53</i> Y220C mutation.

A Alison M. Schram (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York) J Jean-Sebastien Frenel M Melissa Lynne Johnson (Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN) A Antoine Italiano (Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France) S Shivaani Kummar A Andrew L. Coveler A Alexander I. Spira (Virginia Cancer Specialists and NEXT Oncology-Virginia, Fairfax) A Amy Body (Monash Health and Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia) E Elisa Fontana (Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, United Kingdom) E Elena Garralda A Alastair Greystoke (Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom) M Michael Millward (Linear Clinical Research Ltd and School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia) G Giovanni Scambia D David Shao Peng Tan (NUS Centre for Cancer Research, National University of Singapore and National Cancer Institute, Singapore and National University Hospital (NUH), Singapore, Singapore) M Marc Mardoche Fellous (PMV Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Princeton, NJ) E Ecaterina Elena Dumbrava (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) G Gilberto Lopes

Abstract

TPS11581 Background: TP53, encoding p53 protein, is one of the most frequently mutated genes across all cancers, with TP53 mutations found in ~59% of all solid tumors. TP53 mutations result in the loss of p53 tumor suppressor functions leading to tumor development and progression. The TP53 Y220C mutation, occurring in ~1% of all solid tumors, is a missense mutation that destabilizes the p53 protein. Rezatapopt (also known as PC14586) is an investigational, first-in-class, selective, p53 reactivator specific to the TP53 Y220C mutation that restores wildtype p53 function. Preliminary findings from Phase 1 part of the PYNNACLE (NCT04585750) Phase 1/2 study, showed that rezatapopt had a favorable safety profile and single-agent efficacy in heavily pre-treated patients with solid tumors harboring a TP53 Y220C mutation ( Schram A, AACR-NCI-EORTC 2023, LBA25 ). Here we describe the study design for the registrational Phase 2 part of the PYNNACLE study. Methods: The Phase 2 part of PYNNACLE is an ongoing, global, single-arm, open-label, multicenter basket trial in patients with solid tumors harboring a TP53 Y220C mutation (Table). Patients must have measurable disease at baseline, ECOG performance status 0 or 1, and adequate organ function; other key inclusion criteria are listed in the table. Patients with KRAS single nucleotide variants, primary CNS tumors and unstable brain metastases are excluded. Eligible patients receive rezatapopt 2000mg, orally, once daily, taken with food, for continuous 21-day cycles. Patients are followed until death, lost to follow-up, two years after last patient discontinuation, or end of study. As of March 2024, ≈114 patients are planned to be enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT04585750 . PYNNACLE Phase 1/2 basket study (NCT04585750). Patient populationN≈114 (planned) Key inclusion criteria Primary endpoints Secondary endpoints Cohort 1Ovarian cancer (platinum-resistant)n≈42Cohort 2Lung cancern≈18Cohort 3Breast cancern≈18Cohort 4Endometrial cancern≈18Cohort 5Other solid tumorsn≈18 · Adults aged ≥18 years (all global sites except ≥21 years in Singapore)· Adolescents aged 12–17 years if weight ≥40 kg (90 lbs; Australia, South Korea and USA only)· Locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors· Documented TP53 Y220C mutation and KRAS wildtype*· Prior standard therapy or ineligible for appropriate standard of care therapy · ORR per BICR assessment (RECIST v1.1) across all cohorts· ORR per BICR assessment (RECIST v1.1) in ovarian cancer cohort · ORR per investigator assessment (RECIST v1.1) across all cohorts and the ovarian cancer cohort· Time to response, duration of response, disease control rate· Progression-free survival· Overall survival· Safety· Pharmacokinetics· Quality of life *Defined as no KRAS single nucleotide variant. BICR, blinded independent central review; ORR, objective response rate; RECIST v1.1, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (17)

A

Alison M. Schram

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York

J

Jean-Sebastien Frenel

M

Melissa Lynne Johnson

Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN

A

Antoine Italiano

Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France

S

Shivaani Kummar

A

Andrew L. Coveler

A

Alexander I. Spira

Virginia Cancer Specialists and NEXT Oncology-Virginia, Fairfax

A

Amy Body

Monash Health and Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

E

Elisa Fontana

Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, United Kingdom

E

Elena Garralda

A

Alastair Greystoke

Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom

M

Michael Millward

Linear Clinical Research Ltd and School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia

G

Giovanni Scambia

D

David Shao Peng Tan

NUS Centre for Cancer Research, National University of Singapore and National Cancer Institute, Singapore and National University Hospital (NUH), Singapore, Singapore

M

Marc Mardoche Fellous

PMV Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Princeton, NJ

E

Ecaterina Elena Dumbrava

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

G

Gilberto Lopes