PSMA PET/CT–guided intensification of salvage radiotherapy versus conventional planning for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: A GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis.

A Ahmad Khan A Aizaz Anwar Khalid (Peshawar Medical College, Swabi, Pakistan) A Abdullah Ahmad (CMH Lahore Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan) M Muneeba Syed (Quaid-e-Azam Medical College, Bahawalpur, Pakistan) A Ayesha Irshad Ansari (Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan) A Anfal Khan (Saidu Medical College, Swat, Pakistan) A Arsalan Ahmed (Liaquat University of Medical Health Sciences, Jamshoro, Pakistan) A Arisha Akhtar (6Ziauddin University, Karachi, Pakistan) H Hafiza Samra Siddique (Federal Medical College, Islamabad, Pakistan) A Akbar Hussain M Muhammad Younas Y Yasar Sattar (West Virginia University, Morgantown , West Virginia, United States) N Nara Miriam Michaelson (Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) O Owais Gul (United Health Services Hospitals, Johnson City, NY)

Abstract

e17145 Background: Salvage radiotherapy (SRT) is the standard treatment for biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy, yet outcomes remain variable. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT (PSMA-PET/CT) improves detection of recurrent disease and may allow more precise radiotherapy targeting. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare oncologic outcomes and toxicity between PSMA-PET/CT–guided and conventionally planned SRT. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched for randomized trials and comparative cohort studies published through July 2025. Eligible studies included men with BCR after radical prostatectomy treated with PSMA-PET/CT–guided or conventional SRT. The primary endpoint was failure-free survival (FFS). Secondary outcomes included biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), treatment modification rates, and grade ≥2 gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using random-effects models. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB-2 and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: Six studies published between 2021 and 2025 comprising 912 patients were included. PSMA-PET/CT–guided SRT was associated with significantly improved FFS compared with conventional SRT (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.36–0.86; p = 0.008; I² = 0%), corresponding to an absolute reduction of 178 events per 1,000 treated patients. Treatment modification rates were substantially higher with PSMA-PET/CT guidance (RR 32.03), though heterogeneity was high (I² = 95%); sensitivity analysis eliminated heterogeneity, suggesting interstudy variability as the primary driver. Rates of grade ≥2 acute and late GI and GU toxicities were similar between groups. Grade 3 toxicity was more frequent with PSMA-PET/CT–guided SRT (RR 2.34, 95% CI 1.14–4.78), although absolute event rates were low. Conclusions: PSMA-PET/CT–guided salvage radiotherapy is associated with improved failure-free and biochemical progression-free survival compared with conventional planning, without an increase in grade 2 GI or GU toxicity. While grade 3 adverse events were modestly higher, overall rates remained low. These findings support PSMA-PET/CT–guided SRT as an effective strategy for men with biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy, pending confirmation in prospective randomized studies.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (14)

A

Ahmad Khan

A

Aizaz Anwar Khalid

Peshawar Medical College, Swabi, Pakistan

A

Abdullah Ahmad

CMH Lahore Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan

M

Muneeba Syed

Quaid-e-Azam Medical College, Bahawalpur, Pakistan

A

Ayesha Irshad Ansari

Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan

A

Anfal Khan

Saidu Medical College, Swat, Pakistan

A

Arsalan Ahmed

Liaquat University of Medical Health Sciences, Jamshoro, Pakistan

A

Arisha Akhtar

6Ziauddin University, Karachi, Pakistan

H

Hafiza Samra Siddique

Federal Medical College, Islamabad, Pakistan

A

Akbar Hussain

M

Muhammad Younas

Y

Yasar Sattar

West Virginia University, Morgantown , West Virginia, United States

N

Nara Miriam Michaelson

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

O

Owais Gul

United Health Services Hospitals, Johnson City, NY