Prospective Validation of Circulating Tumor DNA Measurable Residual Disease After First-Line Therapy in Large B-Cell Lymphoma

S Steven Wang (Department of Mechanical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong) M Marcel Nijland L Leonie Strobbe (Gelre Hospital, Zutphen, The Netherlands) M Margriet Oosterveld (Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands) R Rinske Boersma (Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands) H Harry Koene (6Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands) C Clara Klerk (Dijklander Hospital, Hoorn, The Netherlands) E Eva de Jongh (14Albert Schweitzer ziekenhuis, Doredrecht, Netherlands) A Ad Koster (13VieCuri Medical Center, Venlo, Netherlands) H Hans Pruijt (Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, ’s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands) M Marjolein Van Der Poel (4Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands) E Erik van Werkhoven (15The Hemato-Oncology Foundation for Adults in the Netherlands (HOVON), Rotterdam, Netherlands) H Helma Zanders (Hemato-Oncology Foundation for Adults in The Netherlands (HOVON), Rotterdam, The Netherlands) A Avinash Dinmohamed (16Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands) M Michiel Pegtel (Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC—Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) S Stephanie Meek (8Foresight Diagnostics, Inc., Boulder, United States) S Sierra Love Stowell (Natera, Inc, Austin, TX) H Hayley Warinske (Foresight Diagnostics, Inc, Boulder, CO) A Ash A. Alizadeh D David M. Kurtz M Martine E.D. Chamuleau (Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC—Location Vrije Universiteit, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

Abstract

PURPOSE End-of-treatment (EOT) response evaluation by positron emission tomography (PET) remains suboptimal in patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), because of its limited positive predictive value (PPV). Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)—based measurable residual disease (MRD) detection offers a minimally invasive approach and may improve prognostication. We prospectively evaluated EOT MRD using phased variant enrichment and detection sequencing (PhasED-Seq) in patients with first-line LBCL. METHODS Patients were enrolled in the HOVON-902 prospective cohort and received curative-intent first-line treatment. Phased variants (PVs) were identified and tracked using tumor biopsies or pretreatment plasma. The prognostic significance of EOT ctDNA-MRD status in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was compared with that of the International Prognostic Index (IPI) and EOT PET-computed tomography (CT). RESULTS PV identification was successful in 134 of 136 (99%) using either tissue or plasma. At EOT, 83% of patients were MRD-negative and 17% of patients were MRD-positive. MRD positivity was strongly associated with inferior outcomes: the 3-year PFS was 17% in MRD-positive versus 85% in MRD-negative patients (hazard ratio [HR], 9.8 [95% CI, 5.1 to 19]; P = 9.63 × 10 −12 ), and the OS was 43% versus 92%, respectively (HR, 7.7 [95% CI, 3.4 to 17.4]; P = 1.27 × 10 −6 ). In multivariate analysis, MRD was an independent prognostic factor when controlling for IPI and EOT PET-CT. MRD positivity had a higher PPV for 2-year PFS than positive PET (68% v 56%, P ≤ .001), whereas negative predictive value was similar between negative MRD and PET (89% v 88%, P = .71). MRD positivity was associated with a significantly higher relapse risk within both complete metabolic response (CMR) and non-CMR subgroups. CONCLUSION This study validates ultrasensitive ctDNA-MRD detection using PhasED-Seq in a uniformly treated, prospective real-world LBCL cohort. These findings support further evaluation of MRD integration into clinical response assessment.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 5
Published February 10, 2026
Pages 400-409
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (21)

S

Steven Wang

Department of Mechanical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong

M

Marcel Nijland

L

Leonie Strobbe

Gelre Hospital, Zutphen, The Netherlands

M

Margriet Oosterveld

Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

R

Rinske Boersma

Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands

H

Harry Koene

6Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands

C

Clara Klerk

Dijklander Hospital, Hoorn, The Netherlands

E

Eva de Jongh

14Albert Schweitzer ziekenhuis, Doredrecht, Netherlands

A

Ad Koster

13VieCuri Medical Center, Venlo, Netherlands

H

Hans Pruijt

Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, ’s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands

M

Marjolein Van Der Poel

4Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands

E

Erik van Werkhoven

15The Hemato-Oncology Foundation for Adults in the Netherlands (HOVON), Rotterdam, Netherlands

H

Helma Zanders

Hemato-Oncology Foundation for Adults in The Netherlands (HOVON), Rotterdam, The Netherlands

A

Avinash Dinmohamed

16Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands

M

Michiel Pegtel

Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC—Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

S

Stephanie Meek

8Foresight Diagnostics, Inc., Boulder, United States

S

Sierra Love Stowell

Natera, Inc, Austin, TX

H

Hayley Warinske

Foresight Diagnostics, Inc, Boulder, CO

A

Ash A. Alizadeh

D

David M. Kurtz

M

Martine E.D. Chamuleau

Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC—Location Vrije Universiteit, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands