Prospective study of patient-reported depression, and cognitive and functional impairment, and impact on survival and induction mortality in fit adults age ≥60 years receiving intensive chemotherapy (IC) for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): Prospective geriatric assessment (GA) report from ECOG-ACRIN (EA) E2906 randomized study
Abstract
Abstract Background We performed a prospective study evaluating a baseline GA battery and clinical outcomes in fit older adults (age ≥60 years) with AML and normal cardiac and renal function in the recent E-A NCTN E2906 phase 3 study. A patient-reported outcomes (PRO) assessment of Depression, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Cognitive Function, Social Support (SS) domains, and comorbidity was performed at study registration to evaluate the prevalence of vulnerabilities and their impact on overall survival (OS) and 30-day induction mortality rates (IM) in this cohort selected for fitness to receive IC. Methods E2906 study design and results have been presented previously [n=727, age ≥60 years, randomized 1:1 to ‘standard 7&3‘ & high dose cytarabine (Arm A) vs. single agent clofarabine (CLO, Arm B), as remission induction (Step 1) and consolidation (Step 2)]. There was no difference in composite complete remission (CCR, 50%) or IM (8.5%), and CLO was inferior for OS. A baseline GA was a key secondary protocol objective, offered to all patients, and n=532 (73%) participated. We assessed Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS, none vs. any depressive symptoms, n=524); cognitive screen using Mini-Mental Exam Section (MMES, score 8/8 vs. <8, n=516); ADL & Instrumental ADL (iADL), (need for assistances vs. not n=526); a Medical Outcomes Study SS Survey (MOS-SS, measured as per unit increase, n=527); a Comorbidity survey ( ≤4 vs. ≥5 patient-reported comorbidities, n=530), patient-reported prescription medications use (PM, 0-3 vs. ≥4, n=519); and a survey of Sexual Desire (n=491) and Sexual Activity (n=477) within 4 weeks of AML diagnosis. Association of GA domains with OS, IM, and achievement of CCR was evaluated using the Chi-squared, Fisher's exact, and Wilcoxon rank sum test. Survival analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for treatment arm. All p-values are 2-sided. Results The median age among those participating in GA battery was 67 yrs (range 60-85), including 38% age ≥70. There were 42% females, and ECOG performance status was 0 (28%), 1 (54%), 2 (16%), or 3 (2%). Central Cytogenetic review was classified (ELN2017) as Favorable (3%), Intermediate (66%), and Adverse (31%) risk. There was a notable rate of GA scores outside ‘normal’ clinical cutoff, including Depression (GDS 31%), cognitive and functional impairment [MMSE (37%), ADL (25%) and iADL (32%)], ≥5 Comorbidities (23%), and ≥4 PM's (44%). 81% & 76%, respectively, reported no sexual activity and low/none sexual desire. MOS-SS tended to be high in this cohort [mean (SD) score 87 (17)]. We observed a significant association of GA domains with OS & IM. For OS, absence of depressive symptoms [GDS, Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.79, 95% confidence Intervals (CI) 0.64-0.97, p=0.025)], MMES 8/8 (HR 0.78, 95%CI 0.64-0.96, p=0.016), requiring no assistance with ADLs (HR 0.65, 95%CI 0.52-0.82, p<0.001) and iADLs (HR 0.69, 95%CI 0.57-0.85, p<0.001), and ≤4 Comorbidities (HR 0.68, 95%CI 0.54-0.84, p=0.001) were significant for superior OS; use of ≥4 PM's was associated with inferior OS (HR 1.32, 95%CI 1.09-1.61, p=0.005). There was no association of sexual activity/desire, BMI ≥30 kg/m2, or MOS-SS with OS. IM was significantly higher among those with any depression symptoms (GDS, p=0.005), any ADL (p=0.010) or iADL (p=0.013) impairment, ≥5 comorbidities (p=0.037) and ≥4 PM's (p=0.001); there was no association with MOS-SS or MMES. There was no significant association of GA scores with cytogenetic risk group or with CCR rates. Only ADL independence (p=0.048), and possibly Comorbidity ≤4 (p=0.071), were associated with proceeding to Step 2. Conclusions In this large prospective cohort of fit older adults with AML selected to receive IC, we observed high rates of PRO-assessed GA vulnerability, which was significantly associated with inferior OS and higher IM rates, and (for ADL impairment) lower rates of proceeding to consolidation therapy. This suggests that functional and cognitive impairments are prevalent and can significantly impact outcome even in fit older adults. Despite potential long-term OS advantages of IC previously observed in E2906, efforts to systematically recognize those at higher risk based on GA PROs are needed to help identify patients who may be more appropriate for study of lower intensity treatment options to mitigate impact on IM and OS. SImilarly we plan to evaluate the potential benefit of GA-driven supportive care to improve patients' outcomes.
Article Details
Authors (27)
James Foran
6Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Jacksonville, United States
Li Chen
Selina Luger
14University of Pennsylvania/ Abrahmson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, United States
Zhuoxin Sun
2Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
Heidi Klepin
6Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, United States
Catherine Lai
Gilead Sciences, Foster City, CA
David Claxton
1Penn State College of Medicine and Penn State Cancer Institute, Hematology and Oncology, Hershey, United States
Hillard Lazarus
6Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States
Daniel Arber
8University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
Jacob Rowe
7Rambam Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
Elisabeth Paietta
4Montefiore Medical Center, Moses Campus, Bronx, United States
Janis Racevskis
4Montefiore Medical Center, Moses Campus, Bronx, United States
Francine Garrett-Bakelman
3University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, United States
Yanming Zhang
Jessica Altman
12Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, United States
Aref Al-Kali
1Mayo Clinic, Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Rochester, United States
Hong Zheng
Center of Nanomaterials for Renewable Energy, State Key Laboratory of Electrical Insulation and Power Equipment, School of Electrical Engineering
Keith Pratz
12Johns Hopkins University/ Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, United States
Kristen O'Dwyer
22University of Rochester, Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, United States
Edward Broun
15OHC, Cincinnati, United States
Bayard Powell
5Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, United States
John Godwin
6Providence Cancer Center, Portland, United States
Yishai Ofran
Efrat Dotan
17University of Pennsylvania, Lancaster, United States
Mark Litzow
21Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
Martin Tallman
5Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
Lynne Wagner