Prospective monitoring of prostate specific membrane antigen–positive biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (PSMA+ BCR): Preliminary data from 6-month PSMA follow-up.

R Ravi Amrit Madan (Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) M Melissa Lauren Abel (Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) E Esther Mena (1National Cancer Institute, Lymphoid Malignancies Branch, Bethesda, United States) L Liza Lindenberg (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) M Megan Hausler (Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) M Monique Williams (Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) A Amy Hankin (Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) J Jeanny B. Aragon-Ching (Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA) L Laura A. Sena (Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD) R Russell Kent Pachynski (Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO) E Edwin Melencio Posadas (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA) H Helen Moon (From the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda (A.B.A., N.S., S.N., L.L., L.C.), the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore (J.H.-C.), and the Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville (H.S., E.S.) — all in Maryland; the Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (K.V.B., M.O., C.M., G.P.B.); AdventHealth Cancer Institute and the University of Central Florida, Orlando (G.S.); Dana–Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston (S.B., B.M.); UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (W.Y.K.), and Duke University Medical Center and Duke Cancer Institute, Durham (J.H., S.H.) — both in North Carolina; the University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood (R.P.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (M.Y.T., M.J.M., J.E.R.), and Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (G.C.) — both in...) M Marijo Bilusic (University of Miami/Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL) F Fatima Karzai P Peter L. Choyke

Abstract

5098 Background: PSMA imaging can identify recurrent prostate cancer after definitive surgery/radiation prior to detection on computed tomography (CT) or bone scan. Radiation to PSMA+ findings is common but lacks clear data demonstrating long term benefit. PSMA+ biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (PSMA+ BCR) is often defined and treated as metastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC), yet PSMA imaging alone as an eligibility criteria was never studied in the mCSPC trials. PSA+ BCR requires better understanding to define at-risk patients (pts). Methods: NCT05588128 enrolls pts after definitive and possibly salvage therapies. Pts are required to be 1 year removed from definitive therapy with a PSA>0.5 ng/ml, testosterone>100 ng/dL, and negative CT/bone scans. Lymph nodes (LNs) up to 1.5 cm and prior therapies are permitted. At enrollment pts have a baseline PSMA, which is repeated every 6 months (mos) if positive. If negative PSMA is done annually. CT and bone scan are also repeated annually. Pts are allowed to have radiation therapy or systemic therapies for ≤6 mos and remain on-study. Up to 350 pts will be enrolled and followed for up to 5 years. Results: Over 120 pts have enrolled since 3/2023 and 86 pts are evaluable after the 6-month PSMA scan/follow-up. The pts have a median age of 71 years, PSA=3.05, PSA doubling time=11.1 mos (29% less than 6 mos). In an overlapping descriptive analysis 10 pts were PSMA- and 17 pts had only local disease. For PSMA+ LNs, 17 pts had 1 LN, 9 pts had 2-3 LNs+, 5 pts had 4 LNs+, and 18 pts had 5+ LNs. 7 pts had bone findings, but negative bone scan. 4 pts had PSMA+ serosal nodules. 4 pts had radiation to solitary LNs. 1 pt elected androgen deprivation and 1 pt had salvage radiation. 4 pts enrolled on a clinical study at the NCI without androgen deprivation. At 6 mos PSMA scan only 1 pt had metastatic disease (bone scan findings). No pts had LNs beyond eligibility size criteria. No pts had new visceral findings. Conclusions: These preliminary data from an ongoing study suggest PSMA+ BCR is an indolent disease process and pts are at limited risk for clinically relevant progression within 6 mos. This study continues to accrue at the NCI and will seek to better define high risk PSMA+ BCR. These preliminary data may better inform the risk/benefits of aggressive treatment of PSMA+ BCR and clinical studies in PSMA+ BCR. Clinical trial information: NCT05588128 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 5098-5098
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (15)

R

Ravi Amrit Madan

Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD

M

Melissa Lauren Abel

Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD

E

Esther Mena

1National Cancer Institute, Lymphoid Malignancies Branch, Bethesda, United States

L

Liza Lindenberg

National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD

M

Megan Hausler

Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD

M

Monique Williams

Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD

A

Amy Hankin

Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD

J

Jeanny B. Aragon-Ching

Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA

L

Laura A. Sena

Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

R

Russell Kent Pachynski

Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO

E

Edwin Melencio Posadas

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA

H

Helen Moon

From the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda (A.B.A., N.S., S.N., L.L., L.C.), the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore (J.H.-C.), and the Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville (H.S., E.S.) — all in Maryland; the Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (K.V.B., M.O., C.M., G.P.B.); AdventHealth Cancer Institute and the University of Central Florida, Orlando (G.S.); Dana–Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston (S.B., B.M.); UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (W.Y.K.), and Duke University Medical Center and Duke Cancer Institute, Durham (J.H., S.H.) — both in North Carolina; the University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood (R.P.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (M.Y.T., M.J.M., J.E.R.), and Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (G.C.) — both in...

M

Marijo Bilusic

University of Miami/Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL

F

Fatima Karzai

P

Peter L. Choyke