Prophylaxis with thiotepa and high-dose methotrexate showed lower central nervous system relapse rate in high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Abstract
Abstract Background: Central nervous system (CNS) relapse in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) confers a dismal prognosis. Controversy exists regarding the optimal method of CNS prophylaxis in high-risk DLBCL. Although methotrexate (MTX) is the most widely used therapy for CNS prophylaxis, results from previous studies investigating systemic high-dose methotrexate or intrathecal methotrexate remain inconclusive. Therefore, additional strategies for preventing CNS relapse in DLBCL patients are required. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of different prophylactic regimens: thiotepa plus high-dose methotrexate (TT-HD-MTX), high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX), or intrathecal methotrexate and cytarabine (IT) in newly diagnosed DLBCL patients with high-risk for CNS relapse. Methods We retrospectively analyzed all newly diagnosed DLBCL patients with high risk for CNS relapse (CNS risk score 4-6, CD5 positive, primary cutaneous DLBCL-leg type, or involvement of kidney, adrenal gland, breast, uterus, sinuses, or testicles) treated at Hunan Cancer Hospital between November 2009 and August 2024. Patients received either TT-HD-MTX (thiotepa 40 mg/m2, methotrexate 3.5 g/m2 for 2 cycles after the course of treatment), HD-MTX (methotrexate 3.5 g/m2 for 2 cycles after the course of treatment), or IT prophylaxis (4 doses during the course of treatment). The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of CNS relapse at 2 years, and the secondary endpoint was adverse events. Results A total of 245 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients (132 males; median age 60 years, range 19-76) with high-risk for CNS relapse were included. Of these, 173 patients were stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ disease, 36 had kidney or adrenal gland involvement, and 46 were CD5 positive. With a median follow-up of 30 months, the cumulative incidence of CNS relapse at 2 years was 16.7% (14/84) in the IT group, 10.0% (11/110) in the HD-MTX group, and 3.9% (2/51) in the TT-HD-MTX group. After multiple comparisons correction, no significant difference was observed between the IT and HD-MTX groups (P = 0.644). However, significant differences were observed between the TT-HD-MTX and HD-MTX groups (P = 0.0003), as well as between the TT-HD-MTX and IT groups (P = 0.0002). The most common adverse events included leukopenia (17.9% in the IT group, 50.9% in the HD-MTX group, and 52.9% in the TT-HD-MTX group), thrombocytopenia (14.3% in the IT group, 31.8% in the HD-MTX group, and 35.3% in the TT-HD-MTX group), and anemia (11.9% in the IT group, 27.3% in the HD-MTX group, and 29.4% in the TT-HD-MTX group). Grade 3-4 adverse events included leukopenia (2.4% in the IT group, 9.1% in the HD-MTX group, and 9.8% in the TT-HD-MTX group), thrombocytopenia (1.2% in the IT group, 4.5% in the HD-MTX group, and 5.9% in the TT-HD-MTX group), and pneumonia (2.4% in the IT group, 3.6% in the HD-MTX group, and 3.9% in the TT-HD-MTX group). No treatment-related deaths were reported. Conclusion Thiotepa plus high-dose methotrexate is an effective and well-tolerated CNS prophylactic regimen for high-risk newly diagnosed DLBCL patients. We are currently conducting prospective studies to validate these findings. Keywords Central nervous system prophylaxis; Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; Thiotepa; High-dose methotrexate.
Article Details
Authors (8)
Ruolan Zeng
2Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China
Zhou Ouyang
1Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China
Yinhua Liu
Xiaoyan Chen
Qianyin Ouyang
1Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China
Yin Wu
Ling Xiao
Hui Zhou
Department of Chemistry and Materials