Prophylactic G-CSF (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) in AML (Acute myeloid leukemia) induction: A meta-analysis dispelling relapse concerns and reinforcing supportive benefit

A Anubhuti Sharma (Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States) A Arundhati Sharma (Mayo clinic, Sayre, Pennsylvania, United States) S Simranpreet Singh Daid (Roger William Medical center, Providence, Rhode Island, United States) M Marcelle Meseeha (1Guthrie Clinic, GME, Sayre, United States) J Joyson Poulose (1Guthrie Clinic, GME, Sayre, United States)

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is routinely used to reduce chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, yet its role as primary prophylaxis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains controversial due to concerns of increased relapse risk. This study aims to clarify the safety and efficacy profile of G-CSF during induction therapy in adult AML patients through a comprehensive meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using PubMed, Ichushi-Web, and the Cochrane Library to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing G-CSF prophylaxis to placebo or standard care in AML. Data extraction and quality assessment were independently performed by two reviewers. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using fixed-effects models. Nine RCTs were included, analyzing: Infection-related mortality (6 RCTs; n = 1,465), Disease progression/recurrence mortality (3 RCTs; n = 920), Adverse events (e.g., musculoskeletal pain) (2 RCTs; n = 365). Results: Infection-related mortality: No significant difference between G-CSF and control (RR = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.64–1.36; I² = 0%). Disease progression/recurrence mortality: No increased risk observed with G-CSF (RR = 1.07; 95% CI: 0.82–1.40; I² = 43%). Adverse reactions (musculoskeletal pain): Comparable between groups (RR = 1.09; 95% CI: 0.50–2.34; I² = 70%). Importantly, G-CSF significantly shortened the duration of neutropenia and hospitalization without compromising survival or increasing relapse risk. Conclusion: G-CSF primary prophylaxis during AML induction therapy is safe and effective. It does not adversely impact infection-related mortality, disease progression, or adverse events, while substantially reducing neutropenia duration. These findings strongly support the use of G-CSF in adult AML patients, especially those at high risk of infectious complications. G-CSF should be considered a standard supportive care measure in AML induction protocols to optimize clinical outcomes and resource utilization.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 6984-6984
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (5)

A

Anubhuti Sharma

Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

A

Arundhati Sharma

Mayo clinic, Sayre, Pennsylvania, United States

S

Simranpreet Singh Daid

Roger William Medical center, Providence, Rhode Island, United States

M

Marcelle Meseeha

1Guthrie Clinic, GME, Sayre, United States

J

Joyson Poulose

1Guthrie Clinic, GME, Sayre, United States