Prokaryotic bias in surface ocean particles

Y Yeongjun Ryu (Department of Geosciences, Princeton University) A Ashley E. Maloney (Department of Geosciences, Princeton University) V Victoria H. Luu (Department of Geosciences, Princeton University) L Lingkun Guo (Department of Geosciences, Princeton University) S Sergey Oleynik S Sarah E. Fawcett (Department of Oceanography, University of Cape Town) M Meytal B. Higgins (ExxonMobil Technology and Engineering Company) N Nicolas Van Oostende (Department of Geosciences, Princeton University) B Bess B. Ward (Department of Geosciences, Princeton University) C Claire C. Z. Cook (Skidaway Institute of Oceanography, University of Georgia) N Natalie R. Cohen (Skidaway Institute of Oceanography, University of Georgia) E Erica Ewton (Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island) S Susanne Menden-Deuer (Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island) J Julie Granger (Department of Marine Sciences, University of Connecticut) A Adrian Marchetti (Department of Earth, Marine and Environmental Sciences, University of North Carolina) H Hedy M. Aardema (Climate Geochemistry Department, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry) H Hans A. Slagter (Climate Geochemistry Department, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry) R Ralf Schiebel (Climate Geochemistry Department, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry) A Alfredo Martínez-García G Gerald H. Haug D Daniel M. Sigman

Abstract

While the ocean’s photosynthetic production of organic matter rivals that on land, a combination of heterotrophy and sinking prevents significant accumulation of particulate organic matter (POM) in open ocean surface waters. The origins and fates of POM in ocean surface waters are unclear, in part due to the dominance of nonliving, altered material. From the natural nitrogen isotopic composition of chlorophyll and its degradation products, we estimate the fraction of particles from eukaryotic vs. prokaryotic phytoplankton. In subtropical gyres and along the eastern North Pacific margin, the eukaryotic-to-prokaryotic ratio in particles matches that of living phytoplankton. However, in the North Atlantic outside its subtropical gyre, particles have a lower eukaryotic-to-prokaryotic ratio than do the living phytoplankton. This discrepancy at least partly arises from preferential sinking of eukaryotic biomass, consistent with the canonical but disputed paradigm that cyanobacteria disproportionately fulfill the energetic demands of the upper ocean microbial community while eukaryotes drive export production. The prokaryotic bias in surface ocean particles may also result from slow decomposition of specific components of prokaryotic biomass, a possible bottleneck in the ocean’s microbial loop. The different fates of organic matter produced by eukaryotic and prokaryotic phytoplankton affect the productivity of the surface ocean, carbon export to the interior, and the signals recorded in deep-sea sediments.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 123, Issue 14
Published April 07, 2026
ISSN 0027-8424
Publisher National Academy of Sciences

Authors (21)

Y

Yeongjun Ryu

Department of Geosciences, Princeton University

A

Ashley E. Maloney

Department of Geosciences, Princeton University

V

Victoria H. Luu

Department of Geosciences, Princeton University

L

Lingkun Guo

Department of Geosciences, Princeton University

S

Sergey Oleynik

S

Sarah E. Fawcett

Department of Oceanography, University of Cape Town

M

Meytal B. Higgins

ExxonMobil Technology and Engineering Company

N

Nicolas Van Oostende

Department of Geosciences, Princeton University

B

Bess B. Ward

Department of Geosciences, Princeton University

C

Claire C. Z. Cook

Skidaway Institute of Oceanography, University of Georgia

N

Natalie R. Cohen

Skidaway Institute of Oceanography, University of Georgia

E

Erica Ewton

Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island

S

Susanne Menden-Deuer

Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island

J

Julie Granger

Department of Marine Sciences, University of Connecticut

A

Adrian Marchetti

Department of Earth, Marine and Environmental Sciences, University of North Carolina

H

Hedy M. Aardema

Climate Geochemistry Department, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry

H

Hans A. Slagter

Climate Geochemistry Department, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry

R

Ralf Schiebel

Climate Geochemistry Department, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry

A

Alfredo Martínez-García

G

Gerald H. Haug

D

Daniel M. Sigman