Progression patterns and clinical outcomes after anti-PD-1 therapy failure in patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

K Karam Khaddour (Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) P Pamela Kote (UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States) T Thomas Ohryn Doyle (Dana- Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) J Jeffrey Guenette (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA) J Jonathan Daniel Schoenfeld (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) D Danielle Nina Margalit (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) R Roy B. Tishler E Eleni M. Rettig R Rosh K. Sethi D Donald J. Annino L Laura A. Goguen (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) R Ravindra Uppaluri C Catherine E. Pisano (Dana- Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) A Abigail H. Waldman (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA) C Chrysalyne D. Schmults (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA) E Emily S. Ruiz (Brigham & Women’s Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) J Justine Vanessa Cohen (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) A Ann W. Silk G Glenn J. Hanna

Abstract

e21521 Background: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) is the second most common cancer globally; however, advanced disease impacts a small subset of patients. Anti-PD-1 therapy yields durable responses, but progression develops in more than 30% of patients, with limited knowledge on outcomes after anti-PD-1 failure. This study investigates clinical outcomes in patients with CSCC following progression on anti-PD-1 therapy. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients with CSCC who progressed on anti-PD-1 therapy at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute was performed. Patterns of progression, therapy type, and median time on therapy were summarized descriptively. Progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated from initiation of post anti-PD-1 therapy, and CSCC-specific death was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Of 142 patients who received anti-PD-1 therapy, 54 developed disease progression, including 13 (24%) female, and 16 (30%) immunosuppressed. Primary head and neck location was the most common site in 30 patients (56%). AJCC 8 th edition CSCC stage at the time of starting anti-PD-1 was II/III in 27 (54%), and IV in 25 (46%). Median time on anti-PD-1 was 3 months (range, 1-27). Median follow-up time post-anti-PD-1 was 13 months (range, 1-58). Site of progression after anti-PD-1 failure was local in 14 (26%), locoregional nodal disease in 22 (41%), and metastatic in 18 (33%) of patients. There were 46 (85%) patients who received subsequent therapy after anti-PD-1, and 17 (32%) had anti-PD-1 re-challenged with 4 observed responses in evaluable patients. The median number of treatments post-anti-PD-1 was 1 (range, 0-11). The most common subsequent treatment following anti-PD-1 was a cetuximab containing regimen in 18 (39%) patients, with a response rate of (45%). The median PFS post-anti-PD-1 was 7 months (95% CI, 2.8-11.3), and median CSCC-specific survival was 27 months (95% CI, 12.3-45.9). Conclusions: In this cohort of patients with CSCC, the most common pattern of progression post-anti-PD-1 was non-metastatic progression involving regional lymph nodes. Cetuximab containing regimen was the most frequently utilized subsequent therapy. Larger studies are warranted to determine the best approach of treatment after anti-PD-1 therapy failure.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (19)

K

Karam Khaddour

Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

P

Pamela Kote

UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

T

Thomas Ohryn Doyle

Dana- Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

J

Jeffrey Guenette

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

J

Jonathan Daniel Schoenfeld

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

D

Danielle Nina Margalit

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

R

Roy B. Tishler

E

Eleni M. Rettig

R

Rosh K. Sethi

D

Donald J. Annino

L

Laura A. Goguen

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

R

Ravindra Uppaluri

C

Catherine E. Pisano

Dana- Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

A

Abigail H. Waldman

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

C

Chrysalyne D. Schmults

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

E

Emily S. Ruiz

Brigham & Women’s Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

J

Justine Vanessa Cohen

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

A

Ann W. Silk

G

Glenn J. Hanna