Prognostic value of PSA nadir ≤0.2 ng/mL in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

A Arjun Pon Avudaiappan M Mohammad Arfat Ganiyani (6Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, United States) D Dawood Hasan Syed (Geisinger Health System, Wilkes-Barre, PA) A Anisha Agarwal (1Ascension Saint Joseph - Chicago, Internal Medicine, Chicago, United States) G Gabriel Valagni (3Ascension Saint Joseph Hospital, Chicago, United States) V Vanshi Bangia (Baptist Health of South Florida/Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL) A Avi Ravi Harisingani (Loyola University Health System, MacNeal Hospital, Berwyn, IL) A Atulya Aman Khosla M Mohammad Aysheh (St. George's University School of Medicine, True Blue, Grenada) K Karan Jatwani (7George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington DC, United States) D Deepak Kilari (Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI) M Manmeet Singh Ahluwalia (Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL) R Rohan Garje (3Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, United States)

Abstract

5100 Background: The treatment landscape for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) has changed substantially with the adoption of early treatment intensification using androgen-receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) and chemotherapy, in addition to traditional androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). PSA nadir has long been used to support prognosis and inform treatment decisions; however, the historical thresholds were established based on patients treated solely with ADT and may not fully reflect outcomes in the modern era of combination therapy. Although emerging evidence suggests that a PSA nadir of < 0.2 ng/dl is associated with improved disease control and survival, a systematic evaluation across available mCSPC trials is needed to clarify the prognostic value of PSA nadir and its potential role in guiding treatment decisions. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted through October 31, 2025, to identify studies reporting outcomes by PSA nadir category in men with mCSPC. Eligible studies included patients initiating systemic therapy with ADT alone or in combination with ARPI and/or chemotherapy. The reported hazard ratios (HR) for time-to-event endpoints stratified by PSA nadir (=< 0.2 ng/dl) were analyzed to get pooled HR. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Results: A total of eight trials comprising 6,582 patients were included. The pooled HR for the primary endpoint, overall survival (OS), was 0.27 (95% CI: 0.21–0.36; I² = 88.1%), indicating a clinically meaningful survival advantage among patients achieving PSA nadir. Consistent findings were observed for secondary outcomes. Achieving a PSA nadir ≤0.2 ng/mL was associated with longer radiographic progression-free survival (HR 0.23; 95% CI: 0.12–0.45; I² = 87.8%) and longer PSA progression-free survival (HR 0.19; 95% CI: 0.08–0.45; I² = 92.6%). A PSA nadir ≤0.2 ng/mL also correlated with a delayed onset of castration resistance (HR 0.31; 95% CI: 0.16–0.61; I² = 93.5%). Assessment of publication bias using Begg’s and Egger’s tests revealed no significant evidence of small-study effects for any endpoint. Conclusions: Across contemporary mCSPC trials, achieving a PSA nadir of ≤0.2 ng/mL consistently predicts improved survival and delayed disease progression. These findings establish PSA nadir as a clinically meaningful and cost-effective biomarker that can help guide treatment-intensification and de-intensification strategies in routine practice. Study Hazard Ratio (HR) 95% Confidence Interval (CI) Weight (%) SWOG9346 0.23 [0.19, 0.27] 13.80 SWOG S0925 0.20 [0.14, 0.28] 12.06 ARASENS 0.49 [0.37, 0.65] 12.65 CHAARTED 0.41 [0.32, 0.53] 13.00 ARCHES 0.24 [0.17, 0.34] 11.82 TITAN 0.35 [0.25, 0.48] 12.09 ARANOTE 0.14 [0.09, 0.21] 10.79 SWOG S1216 0.25 [0.21, 0.30] 13.78 Overall (Pooled) 0.27 [0.21, 0.36] 100.00

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 5100-5100
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (13)

A

Arjun Pon Avudaiappan

M

Mohammad Arfat Ganiyani

6Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, United States

D

Dawood Hasan Syed

Geisinger Health System, Wilkes-Barre, PA

A

Anisha Agarwal

1Ascension Saint Joseph - Chicago, Internal Medicine, Chicago, United States

G

Gabriel Valagni

3Ascension Saint Joseph Hospital, Chicago, United States

V

Vanshi Bangia

Baptist Health of South Florida/Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL

A

Avi Ravi Harisingani

Loyola University Health System, MacNeal Hospital, Berwyn, IL

A

Atulya Aman Khosla

M

Mohammad Aysheh

St. George's University School of Medicine, True Blue, Grenada

K

Karan Jatwani

7George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington DC, United States

D

Deepak Kilari

Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI

M

Manmeet Singh Ahluwalia

Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL

R

Rohan Garje

3Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, United States