Prognostic impact of persistent and treatment-emergent cytopenia in 879 myelofibrosis patients treated with ruxolitinib: The “RUX-MF” study

F Francesca Palandri (2Seragnoli Hematology Institute, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy) F Filippo Branzanti (27Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy) M Massimiliano Bonifacio (1University of Verona, Department of Engineering for Innovation Medicine, Section of Innovation Biomedicine, Verona, Italy) E Elena Maria Elli (4Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Divisione di ematologia e unità trapianto di midollo, Monza, Italy) E Elisabetta Abruzzese (S. Eugenio Hospital) E Erika Morsia (1Hematology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences (DISCLIMO), Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy) M Mirko Farina M Mario Tiribelli (6Clinica Ematologica, Dipartimento di Medicina, Università degli Studi di Udine e Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy) G Giulia Benevolo (16Hematology Unit, Città della Salute e della Scienza of di Torino, Turin, Italy) E Eloise Beggiato (10University Hospital City of Health and Science of Turin - Hospital Molinette, Complex Structure of Hematology, Torino, Italy) B Bruno Martino (17Division of Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliera ‘Bianchi Melacrino Morelli’, Reggio Calabria, Italy) G Giovanni Caocci (7Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Businco Hospital, Cagliari, Italy) N Novella Pugliese (1Hematology and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Center, University of Naples Federico II, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Napoli, Italy) A Alessia Tieghi (13Ematologia, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy) M Monica Crugnola G Gianni Binotto (5Department of Medicine, Hematology Unit, University of Padova, Padova, Italy) F Francesco Cavazzini (9Division of Hematology, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy) A Alessandra Iurlo (1Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy) A Alessandro Isidori (7AORMN Hospital, Pesaro, Italy) A Alessandra Dedola (1IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia “Seràgnoli”, Bologna, Italy) E Emilia Scalzulli (3Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy) A Andrea Duminuco (2UO Ematologia, AOU Policlinico “G. Rodolico” – San Marco, Catania, Italy) D Daniele Cattaneo (1Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy) R Roberto Lemoli C Costanza Bosi (21Diipartimento Oncologia -Ematologia, Divisione di Ematologia, Piacenza, Italy) M Monica Bocchia (1Hematology Unit, University of Siena, Siena, Italy) F Fabrizio Pane (4Hematology – Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Hospital “Federico II”, Napoli, Italy) C Chiara Sartor (1Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy) F Florian Heidel M Massimo Breccia (25Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Azienda Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy) G Giuseppe Palumbo (6Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche, Chirurgiche e Tecnologie Avanzate “G.F. Ingrassia”, University of Catania, Catania, Italy)

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Cytopenia, such as anemia and thrombocytopenia, are associated with inferior overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with myelofibrosis (MF). Ruxolitinib (RUX), a JAK1/2 inhibitor, remains the standard of care for symptomatic, higher-risk MF, but it does not improve cytopenia and may worsen them. Previous studies have shown that both baseline cytopenia and the development or worsening of anemia during the first 12 weeks of RUX negatively impact patient outcomes (Palandri F, et al. Cancer 2023; Kuykendall et al, ASH 2024). However, the 12-week timepoint may be too early to guide clinical decisions. Also, hemoglobin (Hb) improvement during the first 24 weeks of momelotinib therapy was linked to prolonged OS (Palandri F. et al, EHA 2025). Here, we evaluated the trajectory of cytopenia during the first 6 months of RUX therapy, aiming to investigate the prognostic impact of: (1) treatment-emergent (TE) and persistent cytopenia; (2) TE anemia versus TE thrombocytopenia; and (3) Hb improvement in patients with baseline anemia. Methods This sub-analysis of the RUX-MF study (NCT06516406) included 879 patients treated with RUX for ≥6 months. Anemia and thrombocytopenia were defined as Hb <10 g/dL and platelet count (PLT) <100 x10⁹/L, respectively. Patients were categorized into four groups: (1) no cytopenia at baseline (BL) or 6 months (never cytopenia); (2) no cytopenia at BL but development of ≥1 cytopenia during follow-up (TE cytopenia); (3) cytopenia present at both BL and 6 months (persistent cytopenia); (4) baseline anemia with Hb >10 g/dL at 6 months, without concurrent BL/TE thrombocytopenia (improved anemia). OS was calculated from RUX start to death, last contact, or transplant, using the Kaplan-Meier method; hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated via Cox regression. Results At RUX start, 357 pts (40.6%) had anemia (n=301), thrombocytopenia (n=32), or both (n=24). These patients were older, had a higher prevalence of primary MF, higher risk scores, elevated peripheral blasts, and more severe symptoms (all p<0.001) compared to myeloproliferative pts. Median OS was significantly shorter in cytopenic versus myeloproliferative pts (3.7 vs. 6.7 years; HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.75–2.54; p<0.001). After 6 months of RUX, 317 pts (36.1%) remained cytopenia-free; 273 pts (31.1%) developed ≥1 TE cytopenia (205 previously myeloproliferative, 68 with additional cytopenia); 235 pts (26.7%) had persistent cytopenia; 54 pts (6.1%) demonstrated improved anemia. Compared to never cytopenia pts (median OS 8.07 yrs), median OS of TE cytopenia pts was 5.11 yrs (HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.56–2.58; p<0.001), and 3.68 yrs for persistent cytopenia pts (HR 2.62, 95% CI 2.04–3.35; p<0.001). These results remained significant after adjusting for baseline DIPSS/MYSEC-PM risk (p=0.003). Within the TE cytopenia group, pts developing anemia alone (n=149) had a median OS of 6.15 years, while those with isolated thrombocytopenia (n=94) had a shorter median OS (4.33 years; HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.15–2.34; p=0.006), similar to pts developing both cytopenia (n=30, median OS 5.11 years; p=0.74). Compared with never cytopenia pts, TE anemia conferred an intermediate prognosis (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.19–2.22; p=0.002), while TE thrombocytopenia (HR 2.51, 95% CI 1.82–3.47; p<0.001) and concurrent TE anemia and thrombocytopenia (HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.34–3.51; p=0.002) were associated with the poorest outcomes. Patients with baseline and persistent anemia only had shorter OS compared to those with baseline anemia who achieved Hb >10 g/dL at 6 months (3.47 vs. 5.18 years; HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.01–2.12; p=0.043). Conclusions Among 879 MF pts treated with RUX, the proportion with cytopenia increased from 40.6% at baseline to 57.8% at 6 months. Both persistent and TE cytopenia—occurring in 26.7% and 31.1% of pts, respectively—doubled the risk of death. Recovery from anemia without thrombocytopenia was uncommon but correlated with improved survival. TE thrombocytopenia emerged as the most adverse prognostic factor and may warrant inclusion in future dynamic risk models during JAK inhibitors therapy.Patients who remained cytopenia-free had the best survival, representing the most favorable setting for continuous RUX therapy. Achieving Hb >10 g/dL was validated as a favorable prognostic marker during JAK inhibitors therapy. These results underscore the prognostic heterogeneity of cytopenia during RUX therapy and the need for individualized therapeutic strategies.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 3806-3806
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (31)

F

Francesca Palandri

2Seragnoli Hematology Institute, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy

F

Filippo Branzanti

27Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

M

Massimiliano Bonifacio

1University of Verona, Department of Engineering for Innovation Medicine, Section of Innovation Biomedicine, Verona, Italy

E

Elena Maria Elli

4Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Divisione di ematologia e unità trapianto di midollo, Monza, Italy

E

Elisabetta Abruzzese

S. Eugenio Hospital

E

Erika Morsia

1Hematology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences (DISCLIMO), Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy

M

Mirko Farina

M

Mario Tiribelli

6Clinica Ematologica, Dipartimento di Medicina, Università degli Studi di Udine e Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy

G

Giulia Benevolo

16Hematology Unit, Città della Salute e della Scienza of di Torino, Turin, Italy

E

Eloise Beggiato

10University Hospital City of Health and Science of Turin - Hospital Molinette, Complex Structure of Hematology, Torino, Italy

B

Bruno Martino

17Division of Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliera ‘Bianchi Melacrino Morelli’, Reggio Calabria, Italy

G

Giovanni Caocci

7Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Businco Hospital, Cagliari, Italy

N

Novella Pugliese

1Hematology and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Center, University of Naples Federico II, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Napoli, Italy

A

Alessia Tieghi

13Ematologia, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy

M

Monica Crugnola

G

Gianni Binotto

5Department of Medicine, Hematology Unit, University of Padova, Padova, Italy

F

Francesco Cavazzini

9Division of Hematology, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy

A

Alessandra Iurlo

1Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy

A

Alessandro Isidori

7AORMN Hospital, Pesaro, Italy

A

Alessandra Dedola

1IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia “Seràgnoli”, Bologna, Italy

E

Emilia Scalzulli

3Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy

A

Andrea Duminuco

2UO Ematologia, AOU Policlinico “G. Rodolico” – San Marco, Catania, Italy

D

Daniele Cattaneo

1Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy

R

Roberto Lemoli

C

Costanza Bosi

21Diipartimento Oncologia -Ematologia, Divisione di Ematologia, Piacenza, Italy

M

Monica Bocchia

1Hematology Unit, University of Siena, Siena, Italy

F

Fabrizio Pane

4Hematology – Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Hospital “Federico II”, Napoli, Italy

C

Chiara Sartor

1Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

F

Florian Heidel

M

Massimo Breccia

25Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Azienda Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy

G

Giuseppe Palumbo

6Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche, Chirurgiche e Tecnologie Avanzate “G.F. Ingrassia”, University of Catania, Catania, Italy