Primary treatment approaches in advanced HRD-positive (BRCAm and BRCAwt) ovarian cancer in the Russian non-interventional OVARD study.
Abstract
e17561 Background: Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) positive status is a clinically meaningful biomarker in ovarian cancer (OC), associated with improved progression-free survival with the addition of olaparib (ola) to bevacizumab (bev) as maintenance after first-line therapy in PAOLA-1 study. The OVARD study evaluated real-world primary treatment patterns in HRD+BRCAm and HRD+BRCAwt high-grade OC (HGOC). Methods: This non-interventional study analyzed demographics, clinical characteristics, surgery and systemic treatment in HRD+BRCAm and HRD+BRCAwt HGOC using descriptive statistics; multivariable analysis explored factors associated with treatment choice. Results: A total of 400 patients (pts) with newly diagnosed HRD-positive HGOC (FIGO IC–IV) who completed surgery and first-line carboplatin/paclitaxel with or without bev at 29 Russian sites were analyzed: 234 BRCAm and 160 BRCAwt pts. HRD+BRCAm pts were younger (median 52 vs 61 years, p=0.000001) and more frequently had family (44.5% vs 7.5%) and personal (breast cancer 13.3% vs 1.3%) cancer history. HRD status results became available at median 83 days after diagnosis with primary cytoreduction and 105.5 days with interval cytoreduction from routine HRD-testing. Bev was added to first-line chemotherapy in 14.1% (33/234) of BRCAm vs 29.4% (47/160) of BRCAwt pts (p=0.00021), with subsequent ola+bev maintenance in 5.6% vs 17.5% (p=0.00014). Ola maintenance monotherapy was used more often in BRCAm (62.8% vs 35.6%, p=0.000001), while bev monotherapy was more frequent in BRCAwt (14.4% vs 5.1%, p=0.00153). Among pts with residual disease after cytoreduction, response rates to first-line therapy were comparable between BRCAm and BRCAwt (Table). Conclusions: HRD-positive status has become a routine biomarker at HGOC diagnosis and substantially influences first-line and maintenance treatment selection, with bev-containing regimens more often chosen in BRCAwt and ola-based maintenance widely used in both subgroups in real-world practice. Clinical trial information: NCT05918042 . Response on 1 st line therapy in pts with residual disease after cytoreduction. Type of objective response BRCAmn/N BRCAm% BRCAwtn/N BRCAwt% P value Complete response 19/43 44.19 13/36 36.11 0.46653 Partial response 7/43 16.28 10/36 27.78 0.21550
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Svetlana Victorovna Khokhlova
B.I. Kulakov Research National Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation
Rashida Orlova
Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
Alexander Valerievich Sultanbaev
Republican Clinical Oncological Dispensary of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Bashkortostan, Ufa, Russian Federation
Alexey Rumyantsev
Federal State Budgetary Institution (N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology) оf the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation
Valeria Saevets
Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Center of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation
Alina Aleksandrovna Gofman
Altai Regional Oncology Dispensary, Barnaul, Russian Federation
Daniil Stroyakovskiy
Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62, Moscow
Denis Iukalchuk
SBIH "Irkutsk Regional Oncological Dispensary", Irkutsk, Russian Federation
Ruslan Zukov
20Krasnoyarsk Regional Oncology Dispensary, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation
Yana Chapko
Arkhangelsk Clinical Oncological Dispensary, Arkhangelsk, Russian Federation
Sergey Belonogov
State Budgetary Healthcare Institution of the Yaroslavl Region "Regional Clinical Oncology Hospital", Yaroslavl, Russian Federation
Svetlana Goncharova
State Budgetary Healthcare Institution "Primorsky Regional Oncology Dispensary", Vladivostok, Russian Federation
Hedi Musaeva
Oncological Dispensary, Grozny, Russian Federation
Vladimir Alimov
Moscow Botkin Multidisciplinary Scientific-Clinical Center, Moscow, Russian Federation
Orazgul Aymamedova
Lyubertsy Regional Hospital, Moscow, Russian Federation
Natalia Prokudina
Kaliningrad Regional Clinical Hospital, Kaliningrad, Russian Federation
Larisa Kolomiets
Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russian Federation
Olga Vedrova
AstraZeneca, Moscow, Russian Federation
Elena Ulrikh
Almazov National Medical Research Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
Ilya Pokataev
Moscow State Budgetary Healthcare Institution "Moscow City Hospital Named After S.S. Yudin, Moscow Healthcare Department", Moscow, Russian Federation