Prevalence of oral and genital HPV-45 and non–vaccine-targeted HPV-35 among U.S. adults.
Abstract
10597 Background: High-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) types 35 and 45 are oncogenic non-16/18 subtypes that contribute measurably to HPV-attributable genital and oropharyngeal cancers. Unlike HPV-45, HPV-35 is not targeted by the current 9-valent vaccine. Although high prevalence of these subtypes has been reported in some global sub-populations, data on their prevalence and distribution in the U.S. adult population remains limited. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of adults aged 18-64 years from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) cycles 2013-2016. HPV was detected via self-collected oral rinse specimens, vaginal swabs, and penile swabs. HPV vaccination history and sexual behaviors were self-reported. We estimated survey-weighted type-specific HPV prevalence and used survey-weighted Poisson regression to calculate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs), accounting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, vaccination status, and number of lifetime sexual partners. Results: Oral HPV prevalence was low overall, with HPV-16 remaining the most frequently detected type (0.87%). Genital HPV showed a broader distribution of oncogenic types. Among men, penile HPV-35 (1.93%, 95% CI 1.27-2.60%) and HPV-45 (1.94%, 95% CI 1.37-2.50%) were less prevalent than HPV-16 (3.97%, 95% CI 3.13-4.80%) and slightly more prevalent than HPV-18 (1.71%, 95% CI 1.20-2.22%), though confidence intervals overlapped. Among women, vaginal HPV-35 (1.40%, 95% CI 0.95-1.85%) and HPV-45 (1.71%, 95% CI 1.21-2.21%) were also less common than HPV-16 (2.95%, 95% CI 2.14-3.77%) and comparable to HPV-18 (1.26%, 95% CI 0.88-1.65%), again with overlapping confidence intervals. While there were extremely low rates of dual oral-genital infections, males exhibited slightly higher, though non-significant, dual infection prevalences for HPV-35 (0.03% vs. 0%), HPV-45 (0.21% vs 0.07%), and HPV-16 (0.17% vs. 0.11%) compared to females. Non-Hispanic Black participants had a significantly higher genital prevalence of both HPV-35 (aPR 2.75, 95% CI 1.71-4.42) and HPV-45 (aPR 2.08, 95% CI 1.13-3.85) compared with Non-Hispanic White participants. Prevalence was higher among males than females for both types, although these differences did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: In this nationally representative sample of U.S. adults, we found that HPV-35, a high-risk type not included in the current 9-valent vaccine, showed genital prevalence comparable to vaccine-covered types and marked racial disparities. These findings highlight the importance of continued HPV surveillance and targeted prevention strategies. Additionally, future studies should investigate these subtypes in HPV-associated malignancies.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (7)
Morgan C. Byrd
Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
Alexandra Hunter
Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
Vincent M. D’Anniballe
Deesha Bhaumik
American Dental Association, Chicago, IL
Eseosa Odigie
Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
Tammara L. Watts
Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
Nosa Osazuwa-Peters
Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC