Preoperative endocrine treatment response in primary postmenopausal endometrial cancer.

F Fabian Trillsch (LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany) S Sven Mahner (LMU University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Munich, Germany) A Angelina Vlaski (Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany) M Mara Franzl (LMU University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Munich, Germany) T Tanja Paul (Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany) D Doris Mayr (Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany) C Christina Victoria Isabella Tauber (LMU University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Munich, Germany) S Susanne Beyer (LMU University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Munich, Germany) B Bastian Czogalla (LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany) A Alexander Burges (LMU University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Munich, Germany) M Mirjana Kessler (LMU University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Munich, Germany) N Nadia Harbeck (Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich University Hospital, Munich, Germany) A Anca Chelariu-Raicu (LMU University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Munich, Germany)

Abstract

5619 Background: While preoperative endocrine therapy with letrozole has become an established approach for treatment decisions in estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer, this concept has not been transferred to endometrial cancer so far. We hypothesized that preoperative endocrine treatment response to letrozole, assessed by changes in Ki67 expression between baseline and surgery as a marker for cellular proliferation, can be evaluated in primary endometrial cancer as a predictive, patient-specific biomarker. Methods: Postmenopausal patients with first diagnosis of endometrial cancer planned to undergo definitive surgical management with hysterectomy were prospectively included in this single-arm biomarker analysis. Letrozole was administered orally at a daily dose of 2.5mg for a period of 2 to 4 weeks until surgery. Eligibility criteria included all molecular subtypes and histologies and no prior treatment for endometrial cancer was allowed. Ki67 expression was assessed immunohistochemically by two independent pathologists as the percentage of positive tumour nuclei. Relative change in Ki67 (%) from pre-treatment biopsy to post-treatment specimen was assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, substantial response was defined as relative reduction of Ki67 expression ≥50%. Results: A total of 23 patients were prospectively enrolled with median age of 70 years (range 52-88) and median BMI of 32 kg/m² (range 20-48). 22 patients had endometrioid histology (22/23, 95.7%), of those 86.4% (19/22) low-grade and three high-grade (13.6%). One patient had a high-grade serous tumor. 17 of the 23 patients (73.9%) were classified as NSMP (no specific molecular profile), 14 of them ER positive (82.3%). 5 of 23 patients were classified as dMMR (mismatch repair deficient, 21.7%) and one as p53mut (p53 mutant). Median pre-treatment Ki67 expression was 50% (range 10-85) compared to 15% (range 1-80) post-treatment (p<0.0002). Following preoperative letrozole treatment, 16 of 23 patients (69.6%) had a relative reduction of more than 50% in Ki67 expression, 13 of these (81.3%) were of NSMP, three (18.8%) of dMMR molecular subtype. Regarding ER expression in these responders, all dMMR and 11/13 NSMP tumors (84.6%) were ER positive. Two NSMP tumors (14.5%) showed a response to endocrine treatment despite being ER negative. Conclusions: Short-term preoperative letrozole treatment enables identification of patients with substantial endocrine treatment response in primary endometrial cancer. Using this preoperative window-of opportunity, dynamic Ki67 evaluation might serve as an easily accessible predictive biomarker to tailor patient-specific treatment decisions.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 5619-5619
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (13)

F

Fabian Trillsch

LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany

S

Sven Mahner

LMU University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Munich, Germany

A

Angelina Vlaski

Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany

M

Mara Franzl

LMU University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Munich, Germany

T

Tanja Paul

Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany

D

Doris Mayr

Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany

C

Christina Victoria Isabella Tauber

LMU University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Munich, Germany

S

Susanne Beyer

LMU University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Munich, Germany

B

Bastian Czogalla

LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany

A

Alexander Burges

LMU University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Munich, Germany

M

Mirjana Kessler

LMU University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Munich, Germany

N

Nadia Harbeck

Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich University Hospital, Munich, Germany

A

Anca Chelariu-Raicu

LMU University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Munich, Germany