Preoperative assessment of peritoneal carcinomatosis with [ <sup>68</sup> Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT.

A Ayca Arcay Ozturk (Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels,, Belgium) G Gabriel Liberale (Department of Digestive Surgery and Digestive Surgical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium) A Anne-Leen Deleu (Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium) R Raluca Poenaru (Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium) E Erwin Woff P Polastro Laura (Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium) A Ana Veron (Department of Radiology, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium) L Laurine Verset J Jean Christophe Noël (Department of Pathology, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium., Brussels, Belgium) M Mutaz Kassas (Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium) Z Zena Wimana (Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium) S Sigrid Vercauteren (Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium) C Clementine Marin (Department of Medical Physics, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium) P Paulus Kristanto (Clinical Biostatistics Unit, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium) L Loubna Taraji (Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium) P Patrick Flamen (Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium)

Abstract

5553 Background: Accurate preoperative mapping of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is essential for selecting patients for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and guiding treatment planning. Conventional imaging including [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT may underestimate PC tumour burden. This study evaluated [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT for preoperative PC assessment using a surgico-pathological reference standard and compared its performance with MRI and [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT. Methods: In this prospective phase II study (FAPeCa, NCT06061874), patients with colorectal or ovarian cancer with known or suspected PC underwent [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT, [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT (FDG PET), and MRI within 4 weeks before diagnostic laparoscopy and/or CRS. PC extent was quantified using a 10-segment adaptation of the Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI). Reference standard was intraoperative PCI with histopathological confirmation, with pathology adjudicating discordant findings. Agreement between imaging-derived total PCI and the reference-standard PCI was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC, two-way mixed, absolute agreement). Segment-level diagnostic performance was evaluated after dichotomisation (PCI 0 vs ≥1). Subgroup analyses were performed according to recent chemotherapy (&lt;3 months). Results: Sixty-one patients were enrolled. Median (IQR) total PCI values were 11 (18.5) for the reference standard, 12 (15.5) for FAPI PET, 6 (15.5) for MRI, and 4 (6.5) for FDG PET; FAPI-PCI was higher than MRI-PCI and FDG-PCI (Wilcoxon signed-rank, p&lt;0.001). Agreement with the reference standard was highest for FAPI PET (ICC 0.81; BCa 95% CI 0.67–0.89), followed by MRI (ICC 0.76; BCa 95% CI 0.63–0.85) and FDG PET (ICC 0.54; BCa 95% CI 0.29–0.74). In the recent chemotherapy subgroup, FAPI PET maintained good agreement with the reference standard (ICC 0.75, BCa 95% CI 0.56–0.86), whereas agreement declined to moderate for MRI (ICC 0.65, BCa 95% CI 0.41–0.82) and was lower for FDG PET (ICC 0.46, BCa 95% CI 0.17–0.75). Segment-level sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 77.6%, 71.2%, and 74.8% for FAPI PET; 67.0%, 84.4%, and 74.7% for MRI; and 47.5%, 91.8%, and 67.2% for FDG PET . Overall segment-level sensitivities and specificities differed across the three modalities (Cochran’s Q, p&lt;0.001). Conclusions: [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT demonstrated the strongest agreement with surgico-pathological PCI and maintained good agreement after recent chemotherapy. It showed higher detectability than MRI and [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT, albeit at the expense of lower specificity. These findings support[ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT as a promising modality for preoperative PC mapping. Clinical trial information: NCT06061874 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 5553-5553
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (16)

A

Ayca Arcay Ozturk

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels,, Belgium

G

Gabriel Liberale

Department of Digestive Surgery and Digestive Surgical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

A

Anne-Leen Deleu

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

R

Raluca Poenaru

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

E

Erwin Woff

P

Polastro Laura

Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

A

Ana Veron

Department of Radiology, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

L

Laurine Verset

J

Jean Christophe Noël

Department of Pathology, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium., Brussels, Belgium

M

Mutaz Kassas

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

Z

Zena Wimana

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

S

Sigrid Vercauteren

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

C

Clementine Marin

Department of Medical Physics, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

P

Paulus Kristanto

Clinical Biostatistics Unit, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium

L

Loubna Taraji

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

P

Patrick Flamen

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium