Preliminary safety and efficacy of boven (Zanubrutinib, Obinutuzumab, and Venetoclax) as frontline therapy for older patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Abstract
Abstract Background: Frontline mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) treatments are rapidly evolving with incorporation of targeted therapies. We previously demonstrated the safety and efficacy of the BOVen triplet (Zanubrutinib, Obinutuzumab, and Venetoclax) in high-risk pts with TP53-mutant MCL (Kumar Blood 2025). In this phase II, multi-center, investigator-initiated clinical trial, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of BOVen for older MCL pts using a minimal residual disease (MRD)-driven, time-limited approach. Methods: Eligible pts had previously untreated MCL, requiring therapy, ≥65 years (yrs) of age or with comorbidities precluding autologous stem cell transplantation, and ECOG PS ≤2, ANC >1, PLT >75, HGB ≥9 (unless due to MCL). BOVen was administered in 28D cycles: Zanubrutinib (Zanu) 160 mg PO BID starting D1; Obinutuzumab (Obin) 1000 mg IV D1 or split D1-2, 8, 15 of C1, and D1 of C2-8; and Venetoclax (Ven) with standard ramp up dosing initiated C3D1 (target 400 mg QD). The minimum treatment duration was 24 cycles and if uMRD6 complete response (CR) was achieved after 24 cycles, then Zanu and Ven were stopped. The primary endpoint was 3-year progression-free survival (PFS). Responses were assessed per Lugano criteria. MRD was assessed serially using Adaptive clonoSEQ®in peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM). Results: 50 pts were enrolled across 3 sites; data cut April 30, 2025. The median age at enrollment was 72 years (range 47-89); 1 patient was <65 years of age, but transplant-ineligible due to cardiac comorbidity; 64% were male (32/50); various histologic subtypes were included (35 conventional MCL, 7 non-nodal leukemic, and 6 blastoid variant; 2 unclassified); by MIPI risk: 70% high (35/50), 22% intermediate (11/50), and 8% low (4/50); 51% Ki67≥30% (25/49); 29% Ki67≥50% (14/49); 28% TP53 mutation (13/46), and 20% 17p deletion (10/50). Median follow-up was 25 months (range 1.4-33.9). The best overall PET-based response rate was 98% (49/50) with 94% (47/50) achieving a CR. One patient with TP53, NOTCH2, CXCR4, BIRC3, and SMARCA4 baselinemutations progressed before cycle 3 and subsequently died of lymphoma. Three progressions and 5 deaths (2 disease-related, 1 viral encephalitis (possibly treatment-related), 1 hypoxemic respiratory failure due to aspiration pneumonia (treatment unrelated), and 1 sudden death likely due to an acute cardiac event (treatment unrelated)) were observed. One pt was lost to follow-up after C16. The 2-year PFS was 86% (95% CI: 77, 97). The 2-year OS was 92% (95% CI: 84, 100). MRD was evaluable in 98% (49/50) pts. MRD rates at a sensitivity level of 1x10-6 (uMRD6) were 28% at C3 (13/47; 1 without baseline ID sample, 1 early progressor, and 1 missed sample), 87% at C13 (39/45; 1 without baseline ID sample, 1 early progressor, 3 pts yet to reach C13), and 93% at EOT (28/30; 1 without baseline ID sample, 3 progressors, 3 deaths, 1 lost to follow-up, 12 pts yet to reach C24). 30 pts completed 24 cycles. Of these pts, 100% (30/30) achieved a CR and 24 stopped Zanu and Ven at EOT after achieving uMRD6 in PB. Of the 6 patients continued on oral therapy, 1 pt was MRD detectable (dMRD) in PB and BM at 1X10-6; and 5 patients were dMRD in BM, but uMRD6 in PB. The most common treatment-related AEs (TrAE, all grades, ≥10%) were predominantly low-grade and included diarrhea (n=23, 46%), neutropenia (n=17, 34%), thrombocytopenia (n=15, 30%), COVID-19 infection (n=14, 28%), fatigue (n=12, 24%), nausea (n=12, 24%), anemia (n=9, 18%), and infusion-related reaction (n=8, 16%), pneumonia (n=7, 14%), and upper respiratory infection (n=6, 12%). The most common grade 3 or higher TrAEs were neutropenia (n=10, 20%) including 2 grade 3 febrile neutropenia events and thrombocytopenia without bleeding (n=4, 8%). 11 patients experienced grade 3 or higher infectious events (1 viral encephalitis, 1 listeria bacteremia, 2 lung infections, 2 COVID-19 infections, 3 urinary tract infections, 1 prostatitis, and 1 upper respiratory infection). Summary/Conclusion: The MRD response-adapted BOVen triplet is highly active in older MCL patients with high rates of clinical and molecular response. The 2-year PFS rate of 86% is encouraging; however, extended follow-up is necessary to evaluate the 3-year PFS endpoint and the durability of response off treatment. Overall the regimen is safe and well-tolerated in older patients, with a toxicity profile similar to the prior experience with this triplet.
Article Details
Authors (40)
Anita Kumar
1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States
Jacob Soumerai
12Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
Reem Karmali
2Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medicine, Chicago, United States
Jeremy Abramson
5Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Department of Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology Division, Boston, United States
Jeffrey Barnes
23Department of Hematology and Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
Bernadette Beatty
2Massachusetts General Hospital, Mass General Cancer Center, Boston, United States
Jason Brecher
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Lymphoma Division, New York, United States
Philip Caron
1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States
Kenneth Carson
3Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Hematology Oncology, Chicago, United States
Maria Chabowska
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Lymphoma Division, New York, United States
Madelyn Coogan
2Massachusetts General Hospital, Mass General Cancer Center, Boston, United States
Jayne Coyle
2Massachusetts General Hospital, Mass General Cancer Center, Boston, United States
Kevin David
1Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Medicine, Lymphoma Service, NEW YORK, United States
Meemanage De Zoysa
2Massachusetts General Hospital, Mass General Cancer Center, Boston, United States
Ahmet Dogan
Hematopathology Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
Zachary Epstein-Peterson
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
Paola Ghione
4Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Cameron Gordan
2Massachusetts General Hospital, Mass General Cancer Center, Boston, United States
Leo Gordon
1Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Medicine (Hematology Oncology), Chicago, United States
Julie Haydu
5Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Department of Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology Division, Boston, United States
Ephraim Hochberg
5Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Department of Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology Division, Boston, United States
Patrick Connor Johnson
2Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Center for Lymphoma, Boston, United States
Ashlee Joseph
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Lymphoma Division, New York, United States
Akshata Kakolu
2Massachusetts General Hospital, Mass General Cancer Center, Boston, United States
Alyssa Labarre
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Lymphoma Division, New York, United States
Carissa Laudati
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Medicine/Lymphoma, New York, United States
Jennifer Lue
1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States
Shuo Ma
Rosalba Martignetti
2Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Center for Lymphoma, Boston, United States
Colette Owens
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
Olivia Maas
2Massachusetts General Hospital, Mass General Cancer Center, Boston, United States
Joanna Mi
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Lymphoma Division, New York, United States
Rachel Nazzaro
2Massachusetts General Hospital, Mass General Cancer Center, Boston, United States
James O'Grady
2Massachusetts General Hospital, Mass General Cancer Center, Boston, United States
Jessica Pendleton
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Medicine/Lymphoma, New York, United States
Gilles Salles
41Lymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Venkatraman Seshan
1Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Medicine, Lymphoma Service, NEW YORK, United States
Natalie Slupe
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Lymphoma Division, New York, United States
Pallawi Torka
1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States
Andrew Zelenetz
1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States