Preliminary safety and efficacy data of ICP-248, a novel BCL2 inhibitor, in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies.
Abstract
7038 Background: BCL2, a critical protein regulator of the apoptotic pathway, highly expressed in various malignancies, including B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (B-NHLs). The only approved BCL2 inhibitor, Venetoclax, has been approved for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small cell lymphoma (CLL/SLL) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, hematologic toxicities and tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) remain as safety challenges in clinical practice. ICP-248 was developed as a potent and highly selective BCL2 inhibitor. Preclinical studies have demonstrated favorable pharmacokinetics profile and excellent safety profile. Methods: ICP-CL-01201 is an ongoing phase I study (NCT05728658) including dose escalation and dose expansion parts. Safety and tolerability of ICP-248 was evaluated from target doses of 50 mg to 200 mg. Patients receive oral treatment every day until disease progression or intolerable toxicities. Eligible patients include those aged 18-80 years, diagnosed with CLL/SLL and B-NHLs who are in relapsed or refractory disease. Key exclusion criteria include CNS involvement, resistance to BCL2 inhibitors and clinically significant cardiovascular disease. Efficacy was evaluated according to the Lugano 2014 or iwCLL 2018 criteria. Results: As of 12 Dec 2024, 55 patients were enrolled in the study: 18 in dose escalation and 37 in dose expansion. 24 patients were CLL/SLL, 26 patients were mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), 5 patients were other B-NHLs. The median age was 65 years, and 72.7% of patients were refractory disease and 56.4% of the patients were previously treated with BTK inhibitors. The median prior therapeutic line was 2 (1-8). ICP-248 was well tolerated through all dose levels, with no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) observed, and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) not reached. Toxicity leading to drug discontinuation and death was not observed. Most of TEAEs were in grade 1-2. The most frequent TEAEs were hematologic AEs including neutropenia, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported in 16.4% patients. As cutoff date, 20 CLL/SLL and 19 MCL patients treated with ICP-248 dose ≥100 mg had at least one response assessment: ORR was 80% and CRR was 15% in r/r CLL/SLL patients, while those for r/r MCL patients were 78.9% and 42.1% respectively. uMRD was reported in 10% CLL/SLL and 15.8% MCL patients. In 10 patients with previous BTK inhibitor refractory MCL patients (2 blastoid or pleomorphic subtype and median 3.5 prior treatment lines), the ORR was 80% and CRR was 30%; in 11 patients with previous BTK inhibitor failure CLL/SLL, the ORR was 81.8% and CRR was 18.2%. Conclusions: The preliminary results of ICP-248 monotherapy suggests a well-tolerated safety profile and an exciting efficacy with dose-dependent effect in BTK failed, heavily treated, relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies. Clinical trial information: NCT05728658 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Shuhua Yi
4State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China
Keshu Zhou
3the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
Jie Jin
School of Emergency Management, School of the Environment and Safety Engineering
Zhiming Li
Liqun Zou
Zengjun Li
7Cancer Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
Jian Ge
Li Wang
The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital Zhengzhou China
Jian-Qing Mi
Shanghai Institute of Hematology, State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, National Research Centre for Translational Medicine at Shanghai, Research Unit of Hematologic Malignancies Genomics and Translational Research of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Yanli Yang
Hongxiang Wang
11The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Wuhan, China
Wei Yang
Fei Li
Yajun Li
Guohui Cui
10Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
Zhongxing Jiang
14The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
Weige Wang
16InnoCare Pharma Limited, Beijing, Beijing, China
Bin Zhang
Renbin Zhao
16InnoCare Pharma Limited, Beijing, Beijing, China
Lugui Qiu