Preliminary results from LEGEND: A phase 2 study of detalimogene voraplasmid (EG-70), a novel, non-viral intravesical gene therapy for patients with BCG-unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) with carcinoma in situ (CIS).

J John Arthur Taylor (University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS) S Shreyas Joshi (Department of Urology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA) R Raj Satkunasivam R Rian J. Dickstein (Chesapeake Urology, Hanover, MD) A Amirali Salmasi (Department of Urology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA) Y Yair Lotan (Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX) S Scott Johnson (BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CTR, Boston, Massachusetts, United States) R Raj Pruthi (enGene Inc., Waltham, MA) C Christine Tosone (EnGene Inc., Waltham, MA) A Anne K. Schuckman (University of Southern California Institute of Urology Los Angeles California USA) J Jen-Jane Liu (Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR)

Abstract

802 Background: Detalimogene voraplasmid is a novel, investigational, non-integrating, non-viral gene therapy specifically engineered for intravesical administration to elicit local activation of anti-tumor immune responses in the bladder and drive durable efficacy in patients with high-risk NMIBC, including BCG-unresponsive disease, while mitigating the risk of systemic toxicities from immune stimulation. Preclinically, detalimogene voraplasmid remodels the tumor microenvironment, activating both innate and adaptive anti-tumor immune responses. Results from the Phase 1 portion of LEGEND (NCT04752722) demonstrated a promising safety/tolerability profile and an overall CR of 73% in patients with NMIBC with CIS. The pivotal Phase 2 portion is ongoing, and the preliminary outcomes will be reported herein. Methods: Patient eligibility criteria: age ≥18 years; ECOG PS 0−2; BCG-unresponsive NMIBC with CIS ± Ta/T1 disease, ineligible for, or elected not to undergo, cystectomy; satisfactory bladder function with ability to retain study drug for ≥60 minutes. Based on the Phase 1 portion of the study, a dose concentration of 0.8 mg/mL was administered at a four-dose 50 mL instillation schedule at study weeks 1, 2, 5 and 6 of a 12-week cycle. After completing the initial 12-week cycle, patients without progressive disease remained on detalimogene voraplasmid for up to three additional 12-week cycles. Primary endpoint: Week 48 CR rate; secondary endpoint: safety and tolerability. Efficacy data on BCG-unresponsive patients with CIS (n=26; Cohort 1) and safety data on all patients dosed (N=42) are reported. Results: Twenty-six patients (20 males/6 females; median age 74 (range 47–92) years have been enrolled in Cohort 1. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs; any grade) were reported in 20 (47.6%) patients and were all Grade 1/2 in severity. The most common TRAEs were dysuria in 9 (21.4%) patients, bladder spasm in 8 (19.0%); pollakiuria in 5 (11.9%), and fatigue in 5 (11.9%) patients. In the efficacy-evaluable population for Cohort 1, the overall CR rate was 71% (15/21), with a CR rate of 67% (14/21) at 3 months, and 47% (8/17) at 6 months. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the 6-month CR is 51%. Conclusions: Preliminary data from the pivotal Phase 2 portion of the LEGEND study suggest a promising safety/tolerability profile, with TRAEs that were largely consistent with instrumentation/intravesical administration. Overall, 71% of patients dosed with detalimogene voraplasmid achieved a CR, with 67% achieving a CR at 3 months and 47% achieving a CR at 6 months. Cohort 1 (BCG-refractory patients with CIS) continues to enroll, with a target accrual of 100 patients. Clinical trial information: NCT04752722 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 5_suppl
Published February 10, 2025
Pages 802-802
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (11)

J

John Arthur Taylor

University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS

S

Shreyas Joshi

Department of Urology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA

R

Raj Satkunasivam

R

Rian J. Dickstein

Chesapeake Urology, Hanover, MD

A

Amirali Salmasi

Department of Urology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA

Y

Yair Lotan

Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

S

Scott Johnson

BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CTR, Boston, Massachusetts, United States

R

Raj Pruthi

enGene Inc., Waltham, MA

C

Christine Tosone

EnGene Inc., Waltham, MA

A

Anne K. Schuckman

University of Southern California Institute of Urology Los Angeles California USA

J

Jen-Jane Liu

Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR