Preferences among women for home-based self-sampling over clinic-based provider-collection for cervical cancer screening in the US.
Abstract
e22572 Background: Self-sampling for human papillomavirus testing is an evidence-based strategy that can improve cervical cancer screening access and increase screening uptake among under-screened populations. However, preference for and drivers of home-based self-sampling over clinic-based testing (the current standard of care) have not yet been fully studied among screening-eligible women in the US. Methods: Using the 2024 US Health Interview National Trends Survey (HINTS 7) data, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis of women eligible for cervical cancer screening to assess their perspectives about at-home self-sampling for cervical cancer screening and factors associated with preferring this sampling method. We also examined reasons for considering home-based self-sampling for cervical cancer screening. Results: Among the 2,300 women (mean age: 45.5 years, SD: 29.2) included in this study, most were non-Hispanic Whites (60.3%), married/living as married (58.2%), insured (91.9%), and educated up to post-high school or some college (61.6%). Of these, 20.4% preferred at-home self-sampling, 60.8% preferred clinic-based testing, and 18.8% were uncertain about their choice. Non-Hispanic Black women (aOR: 0.45 [95% CI: 0.21–0.96]) had lower odds of preferring at-home self-sampling over clinic-based testing compared to Non-Hispanic Whites. Women who had experienced prejudice or discrimination when getting medical care had higher odds (1.94 [1.16–3.22]) of preferring at-home self-sampling. The most commonly reported reasons for preferring at-home self-sampling were: privacy (54.9%), time constraints (35.1%), and avoiding embarrassment (33.4%). Conclusions: A small proportion of cervical cancer screening-eligible women in the US prefer at-home self-sampling over clinic-based testing. To address cervical cancer inequities and increase screening uptake among under-screened populations, US guidelines should incorporate this innovative screening strategy, and targeted interventions to promote home-based self-sampling are needed.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (6)
Joel Fokom Domgue
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Monalisa Chandra
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Olajumoke Oladoyin
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Manali Desai
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
Robert K. Yu
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Sanjay Shete