Practical geriatric assessment (PGA) implementation strategies and correlative evaluations (PACE-70): A hybrid implementation-effectiveness study in 3 community practices.

G Gabriel Aleixo (1Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Department of Medicine, Philadelphia, United States) J Julianne Ani (Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA) W William J. Ferrell R Ravi Bharat Parikh (Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA) P Peter Gabriel E Efrat Dotan (17University of Pennsylvania, Lancaster, United States) S Simone Fernandes dos Santos Hughes (The Ann B. Barshinger Cancer Institute, Penn Medicine Lancaster General Health, Lancaster, PA) R Ramy Sedhom (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA) S Samuel U. Takvorian (Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA)

Abstract

TPS1661 Background: The use of a geriatric assessment to inform oncologic care for older persons with cancer is an evidence-based practice that improves patient-clinician communication, reduces treatment-related toxicity, and is recommended by national guidelines. However, the implementation of a geriatric assessment can be time-consuming and burdensome, leading to suboptimal use in clinical practice. Developed and endorsed by the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO), the Practical Geriatric Assessment (PGA) is designed to improve clinical usability and adoption, but its implementation in real-world settings has not been evaluated. The PACE-70 study aims to evaluate PGA implementation and resultant chemotherapy dose modification among older adults with advanced cancer treated in a community setting. An exploratory aim will evaluate how the PGA, body composition and step count monitoring correlate with chemotherapy toxicity and other clinical outcomes. Methods: The PACE-70 study is a Type III hybrid implementation-effectiveness study enrolling at three community sites within a large academic health system. Eligible participants will be 70 years or older, have a diagnosis of advanced or metastatic solid malignancy, and be starting a new line of palliative-intent systemic therapy, where the expected prevalence of grade 3 toxicity exceeds 50 percent. The PGA will be administered via the electronic health record (EHR), available for patients to complete independently prior to an initial medical oncology visit, or during the visit with staff assistance. Results from the PGA will be shared automatically with clinical teams via the EHR, including a Best Practice Alert highlighting any identified geriatric impairment(s) and ASCO’s recommendation for PGA-adapted care. The primary outcome will be the PGA completion rate. The secondary outcome will be the rate of chemotherapy dose modification among those with any identified geriatric impairment. Clinician perspectives on PGA implementation will be assessed via structured interviews among a sub-sample of participating clinicians. In a subsample of patients consenting to additional data collection, exploratory analyses will examine correlations between the PGA, step counts (measured via FitBit) and body composition (measured via standard abdominal CT scans) with clinical outcomes, including toxicity, hospitalization, and death. PACE-70 will be the first study to report on real-world implementation of the PGA in a multisite community oncology setting. It will provide insights on the facilitators and barriers of the PGA to inform chemotherapy dose modification, as well as its potential predictive value for clinical outcomes. It will lay the foundation for larger trials of effectiveness seeking to encourage PGA implementation and PGA-adapted care. Clinical trial information: pending .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (9)

G

Gabriel Aleixo

1Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Department of Medicine, Philadelphia, United States

J

Julianne Ani

Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA

W

William J. Ferrell

R

Ravi Bharat Parikh

Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA

P

Peter Gabriel

E

Efrat Dotan

17University of Pennsylvania, Lancaster, United States

S

Simone Fernandes dos Santos Hughes

The Ann B. Barshinger Cancer Institute, Penn Medicine Lancaster General Health, Lancaster, PA

R

Ramy Sedhom

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

S

Samuel U. Takvorian

Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA