Postoperative minimal residual disease detection using tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA analysis in stage II–III gastric cancer: Updated analysis.

B Bom Han H Hayoon Lee M Minkyu Jung (Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea) B Bum Jun Kim Y Yongjun Cha S Sunghoon Heo S Sun Young Rha H Hyung-Don Kim (Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea) M Min-Hee Ryu (Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea) D Dong-Hoe Koo J Jong Gwang Kim H Hye Sook Han (Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju-Si, South Korea) S Sun Jin Sym J Jae-Joon Kim (Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, South Korea) D Do-Youn Oh (Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, and the Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea) K Keun-Wook Lee (Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, South Korea) H Hwang-Phill Kim S Sang-Hyun Song T Tae-You Kim D Dae Young Zang (Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical Center, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, South Korea)

Abstract

428 Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis enables detection of minimal residual disease (MRD), offering potential for improved risk stratification and guidance for adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT). We evaluated the clinical utility of tumor-informed ctDNA analysis for postoperative MRD assessment in stage II–III gastric cancer (GC). Methods: This sub-study of the ongoing EXODOX trial (NCT04787354), a phase III randomized study comparing reduced-duration versus standard 6-month XELOX as ACT in patients with pathologic stage II–III GC after curative resection, investigated ctDNA MRD using the CancerDetect assay (IMBdx, Inc.). This tumor-informed bespoke panel (BSP) was generated by whole-exome sequencing of tumor tissue and paired white blood cells, identifying up to 100 patient-specific variants. Whole blood (20 mL) was collected at five postoperative time points: 3–10 weeks (P0), 6 months (P1), 12 months (P2), 18 months (P3), and 24 months (P4). MRD positivity was defined as detection of ≥2 BSP variants in plasma. Results: This analysis included 68 patients enrolled between May 2022 and March 2025. ctDNA MRD was assessed at P0 (n=64), P1 (n=50), P2 (n=36), P3 (n=27), and P4 (n=15). Median age was 66 years (range, 39–96); 45 patients (66.2%) were male; all had adenocarcinoma; 54 patients (79.4%) had stage III disease. At P0, MRD positivity was 43.8% (28/64), with a median of 7 somatic mutations per patient (range, 2–94). MRD positivity was significantly higher in stage III versus stage II patients (52.0% vs. 14.3%, P=0.015). MRD clearance after ACT occurred in 40.0% (8/20) of patients who were ctDNA-positive at P0. Conversely, 5 (19.2%) of 26 patients who were initially ctDNA-negative converted to positive, resulting in an overall positivity rate of 34.0% (17/50) at P1. MRD positivity rates were 27.8% at P2, 25.9% at P3, and 13.3% at P4. After a median follow-up of 13.3 months, 11 patients (16.2%) experienced recurrence. ctDNA positivity was significantly associated with worse recurrence-free survival (RFS) at P0 (HR, 15.8; 95% CI, 2.0–123.4; P=0.01), P1 (HR, 5.5; 95% CI, 1.1–27.4; P=0.04), and P2 (HR, 24.5; 95% CI, 2.6–234.0; P=0.01). Patients who converted from positive to negative after ACT had RFS comparable to those with persistent negativity, while patients with persistent positivity had the poorest outcomes (HR, 11.6; 95% CI, 2.3–58.1; P<0.01). Conclusions: In stage II–III GC, postoperative MRD detected by ctDNA was strongly associated with recurrence risk. MRD clearance after ACT was associated with outcomes similar to persistent negativity, supporting the clinical utility of ctDNA MRD in guiding ACT decisions. Continued follow-up is underway to validate these findings.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 2_suppl
Published January 10, 2026
Pages 428-428
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

B

Bom Han

H

Hayoon Lee

M

Minkyu Jung

Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

B

Bum Jun Kim

Y

Yongjun Cha

S

Sunghoon Heo

S

Sun Young Rha

H

Hyung-Don Kim

Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

M

Min-Hee Ryu

Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea

D

Dong-Hoe Koo

J

Jong Gwang Kim

H

Hye Sook Han

Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju-Si, South Korea

S

Sun Jin Sym

J

Jae-Joon Kim

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, South Korea

D

Do-Youn Oh

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, and the Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

K

Keun-Wook Lee

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, South Korea

H

Hwang-Phill Kim

S

Sang-Hyun Song

T

Tae-You Kim

D

Dae Young Zang

Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical Center, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, South Korea