Postoperative cfDNA levels and ctDNA detection rates in patients with stage II colon cancer screened for CIRCULATE (AIO-KRK-0217, ABCSG).
Abstract
3610 Background: Postoperative circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a prognostic biomarker for disease recurrence in patients (pts) with resected colorectal cancer (CRC) and may potentially guide adjuvant treatment decisions. The timing of ctDNA screening is critical, as postop. plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) levels may vary due to factors such as tissue disruption from the surgical resection. The CIRCULATE trial (NCT04089631) investigates ctDNA guided adjuvant therapy in stage II CRC pts in > 140 centres in Germany and Austria. Methods: To investigate the impact of blood sampling time points on cfDNA concentrations and the ctDNA positivity rates, we analyzed the postop. plasma samples of 1439 pts with stage II CRC screened for CIRCULATE between 2020 and 2024. Blood samples were collected within 5-60 days post tumor resection in stabilizing tubes (Streck or PaxGene). Samples were analyzed for postop. cfDNA concentration and tumor-informed ctDNA in plasma samples by an error-reduced Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) approach [Stasik S Front Genet. 2022]. Results: Plasma cfDNA concentrations (measured by qPCR for beta-globin gene) ranged from 0.02 to 20.32 ng/µL (mean: 0.689 ng/µL; median: 0.360 ng/µL). The highest cfDNA levels were observed within 2 weeks after surgery (mean: 1.079 ng/µL; median: 0.540 ng/µL), with a significant decrease in samples collected > 3 weeks postop. (mean: 0.631 ng/µL; median: 0.355 ng/µL; p < 0.0001), suggesting an impact of surgical trauma and subsequent cfDNA release from normal tissue. In ctDNA-neg. pts, cfDNA concentrations stabilized between 0.405 and 0.449 ng/µL during weeks 4-8. In contrast, ctDNA-pos. pts had significantly elevated cfDNA levels at 2 months post-surgery (mean: 0.972 ng/µL; p = 0.419), indicating ongoing tumor-specific DNA shedding associated with recurrent disease. Variant allele frequencies (VAFs) in ctDNA-pos samples were negatively correlated with cfDNA concentrations, particularly in early postop. samples (Spearman r = -0.508), suggesting a dilution effect of ctDNA post-surgery. This correlation diminished at later time points, supporting the potential advantage of later sampling to improve ctDNA sensitivity. Despite temporal variations in cfDNA concentrations, ctDNA positivity was consistent across all sampling intervals (i.e. week 1: 4.1%; week 6-8: 5.64%), demonstrating the assay's robust sensitivity. Conclusions: We observed a significant variation in cfDNA levels depending on the timing of postop. sampling. Different kinetics, such as cfDNA release from normal tissue and tumor shedding, may influence cfDNA levels and the sensitivity to ctDNA detection. Nonetheless, our assay demonstrates consistent and reliable sensitivity for ctDNA detection across all postop. sampling time points. Clinical trial information: NCT04089631 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (16)
Sebastian Stasik
4Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
Christian Thiede
7University Hospital, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
Sarah Albus
Institute of Pathology, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany
Eray Goekkurt
Lutz Jacobasch
11Praxis of Haematology and Oncology, Dresden, Germany
Ralf Dieter Hofheinz
Lena-Christin Conradi
Ruediger Liersch
Outpatient Clinics for Hematology and Oncology, Münster, Germany
Anke Kroecher
Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
Uwe Marc Martens
SLK Clinics Heilbronn GmbH, Heilbronn, Germany
Lydia Reinhardt
Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Dresden, Germany
Lukas Weiss
Austrian Breast & Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG) and IIIrd Medical Department, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
Anke C. Reinacher-Schick
COLOPREDICT Platform and Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
Daniela Ellen Aust
Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
Andrea Tannapfel
COLOPREDICT Platform and Institute of Pathology, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany
Gunnar Folprecht
From Bielefeld University, Medical School and University Medical Center Ostwestfalen-Lippe, Campus Hospital Lippe, Detmold, Germany (J.H.); the Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria (T.B.); the Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany (C.S.); the Institute of Surgical Pathology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Germany (P.B.); the Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein–Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (B.K., T.K.); Comprehensive Cancer Center Augsburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany (R.C.); the Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany (S.U.); the Department of General, Visceral, and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg–Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (J.R.I.); the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute and San Raffaele Vita-Salute Universi...