Post-treatment recovery patterns among patients with early-stage cancer who develop taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy (TIPN): SWOG S1714 (NCT03939481).
Abstract
12117 Background: The primary analysis of S1714 developed and validated a TIPN risk prediction model including 5 clinical risk factors. Recovery patterns of TIPN are not well described. Although some symptoms may improve with time, other symptoms may persist or worsen as a result of permanent nerve damage. We describe the incidence of TIPN over 3 years and report on the post-treatment patterns of TIPN in those individuals who report TIPN at the end of taxane treatment (EOT) as a secondary analysis of S1714. Methods: S1714 enrolled participants > 18 years with Stage I-III primary lung, breast, or ovarian cancer starting treatment with a taxane-based regimen for a planned duration of 8 to 18 weeks. Participants were followed over the course of 3 years and assessed for TIPN using the patient-reported EORTC QLQ-CIPN20, which is composed of 3 subscale scores reported from 0-100, with increasing scores representing worse TIPN. EOT TIPN was defined as an increase in the CIPN20 sensory subscale score of ≥8 points from pre-treatment to EOT. Results: Among 1336 enrolled patients, N = 1321 were evaluable: Median age 55.7 years (range 23-85), 98.9% female, 11.3% Black/4.5% Asian/10.5% Hispanic/Latino, 90.7% with breast cancer. Paclitaxel was administered to 60.3% and docetaxel to 39.7%; 98.4% planned to start treatment with full dose of taxane. EOT TIPN was reported in 553 participants (41.9%). We identified 3 patterns of TIPN in these 553 participants over the 3 year period using the EOT CIPN20 sensory score as the reference. Improvement in TIPN from EOT was seen in 268 participants (48.5%), defined as a decrease of ≥8 points from the EOT CIPN20 sensory score. Stable TIPN was seen in 187 participants (33.8%), defined as < 8 point increase or decrease from the EOT CIPN20 sensory score. Worsening of TIPN from EOT was seen in 98 participants (17.7%), defined as an increase of ≥8 points from the EOT CIPN20 sensory score. Of the 553 individuals with TIPN at EOT, 283 (51.2%) still had clinically meaningful TIPN at 3 years compared to the baseline pre-treatment CIPN20 sensory score (defined as increase in CIPN20 sensory score > 8 points from pre-treatment timepoint to final assessment). Conclusions: Among individuals experiencing TIPN at EOT, nearly half experienced clinically meaningful TIPN improvement but almost one fifth had worsening of TIPN by the final 3-year assessment. The identification of clinical and correlative risk factors for persistent or worsening TIPN after completion of taxane treatment will allow for more informed decision-making regarding the long-term risks of taxane treatment and prioritize selection of patients in the investigation of interventions for prevention and treatment of TIPN. Funding: NIH/NCI/NCORP grant UG1CA189974, The Hope Foundation for Cancer Research. Clinical trial information: NCT03939481 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (17)
Meghna S. Trivedi
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
Joseph M. Unger
Public Health Sciences Division Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center Seattle Washington USA
Daniel Louis Hertz
University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, MI
Cathee Till
SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutch Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
Thomas Brannagan
Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
Stephanie Reyes
Lewis Cancer & Research Pavilion at St. Joseph's Candler/GA NCORP, Savannah, GA
Bryan P. Schneider
William Johnson Irvin
Bon Secours Saint Francis Medical Center Cancer Institute/Southeast Clinical Oncology Research (SCOR), Midlothian, VA
Amanda Redden Hathaway
University Cancer & Blood Center, Athens, GA
Amy C. Vander Woude
Cancer & Hematology Centers of Western Michigan, Grand Rapids, MI
Vinay K. Gudena
Cone Health Cancer Center, Greensboro, NC
Paula Anel Cabrera-Galeana
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
Mary Orsted
HealthPartners Cancer Center at Regions Hospital, St. Paul, MN
Michael LeBlanc
2Fred Hutchison Cancer Center, Statistics, Seattle, United States
Michael Jordan Fisch
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Carelon Medical Benefits Management, Houston, TX
Norah Lynn Henry
University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
Dawn L. Hershman
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center New York New York USA